320 Politikwissenschaft
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Dissertation (16)
- Bachelorarbeit (1)
- Masterarbeit (1)
Schlagworte
- Energiepolitik (2)
- Energy Policy (2)
- Gesundheitswesen (2)
- Nachhaltigkeit (2)
- Agriculture (1)
- Arbeitsbedingungen (1)
- Arbeitslosigkeit (1)
- Arbeitsmarkt (1)
- Bürgerbeteiligung (1)
- Civic Engagement (1)
A central aspect of sustainability governance is collaboration, which has been lauded for its benefits but also criticized for its challenges. The potential benefits of collaboration have apparently been recognized also in the context of EU agriculture. Yet, there has been a lack of holistic consideration of how collaboration can be systematically integrated and promoted in the governance of EU agriculture. Sustainable agriculture cannot only be encouraged through changes in the overall governance system but also through the support of existing and emerging small-scale collaborative initiatives for sustainable agriculture. Indeed, there has been substantial research on the conditions that influence success of similar collaborative initiatives. However, the knowledge resulting from this research remains rather scattered and does not allow for the identification of overall patterns. Additionally, little of this research specifically focuses on sustainable agriculture. What is more, the promotion of collaboration for sustainable agriculture is further complicated by the lack of clarity of the meaning of sustainable agriculture, which is an inherently ambiguous and contested concept. This cumulative dissertation aims to address these gaps by contributing to a better understanding of how collaboration can be facilitated and designed as a means to govern for and advance sustainable agriculture. For this purpose, the dissertation addresses three sub-aims: 1) Advancing the understanding of the concept of sustainable agriculture; 2) scrutinizing the current governance system regarding its potential to facilitate or hamper collaboration; 3) assessing conceptually and empirically how actor collaboration can be facilitated as a means to govern for sustainable agriculture, both from a top-down and a bottom-up perspective. In doing so, this dissertation focuses on EU agriculture and applies a mix of methods, ranging from qualitative to quantitative dominant. The findings of this dissertation highlight that collaboration has been underappreciated and even hampered as an approach to governing for sustainable agriculture. In contrast, this dissertation argues that collaboration offers one promising way to promoting and realizing agriculture and emphasizes the need to integrate different approaches to collaboration and to sustainable agriculture.
Die Arbeit analysiert den Einfluss von Arbeitsmarktregimen auf das Sparverhalten privater Haushalte in Deutschland und Großbritannien aus einer vergleichenden Perspektive. Im Zentrum steht dabei die Frage, ob das Sparvermögen abhängig beschäftigter Personen durch ihre Angst vor Arbeitslosigkeit beeinflusst wird. Die Untersuchung widmet sich dem Einfluss von Institutionen auf individuelles Verhalten in unterschiedlichen nationalen Kontexten: geringere Dynamik des deutschen Arbeitsmarktes – operationalisiert über die durchschnittliche Verweildauer in Arbeitslosigkeit – und entsprechend höhere individuelle Angst vor Arbeitslosigkeit tragen demnach zur Erklärung bei, warum die aggregierten Sparquoten privater Haushalte in kontinental-europäischen deutlich höher sind als in angelsächsischen Wohlfahrtsstaaten. Die theoretische Fundierung auf der Mikroebene liefert ein Buffer-Stock Saving-Modell, wonach sich Individuen gegen Einkommensvolatilität durch das Anhäufen von Sparvermögen absichern (Vorsichtssparen). Anhand von Panel-Daten abhängig beschäftigter Personen in Deutschland (SOEP) und Großbritannien (BHPS) ergibt sich unter Kontrolle für Konsumpräferenzen und weitere Einflussfaktoren in Deutschland bei Einverdiener-Haushalten ein Vorsichtsmotiv, das durchschnittlich einem Drittel des liquiden Vermögens entspricht, wohingegen sich kein vergleichbarer Effekt in Großbritannien zweigt.
This thesis aims to provide a quantitative, cross-nationally comparative, longitudinal and multilevel study of the drivers and hindrances of national governments' anti-trafficking measures. In this research, both macro-level determinants of anti-trafficking enforcement and micro-level foundations of human trafficking are explored. In the manuscript, large-N comparative research examines how characteristics of countries interact with people's attitudes towards violence to better understand what creates environments that are more or less supportive of governments' anti-trafficking efforts. The results presented in the thesis speak not only in favor of studying this topic systematically and cross-nationally, addressing existing gaps in the literature but also in favor of combining macro- and micro-level evidence for developing more effective policy responses against human trafficking.
The energy sector is regarded as one of the decisive subsystems influencing the future of sustainable development. Consequently, there is a need for a comprehensive transformation of energy generation, conversion and use. The importance of building capacities for energy policy development in developing countries is bound up with the need to formulate global strategies to meet the challenges that humanity face, especially to achieve the targets manifested in the Agenda 2030 and Paris Agreement. The aim of this research is to better understand how to empower marginalised key societal actors, co-produce alternative discourses about energy futures and articulate those discourses to influence policy change within a context of illiberal democracies in Latin America. The research concerns the design, function and effectiveness of scientifically grounded participatory process, which has been justified theoretically and tested empirically. The process presupposes theoretical perspectives relating to theory, method and empirical application. The first draws on theories of sustainability transition and transformation, including transition management. The second draws on ideas taken from the knowledge co-production and transdisciplinary sustainability research. The empirical application, concerns the implementation of a Transdisciplinary Transition Management Arena (TTMA) and its effectiveness, measured by potential for the co-production of knowledge and for stimulating collective action. As result of the process, a conceptual model of the energy system, long-term visions and transformation strategies were developed. The TTMA processes demonstrated that cross-sectoral and inter-institutional, combined efforts, can help actors visualize possible, future alternatives for sustainable energy development and how to realize such alternatives. The structures provided were helpful for the emergence and empowerment of new sustainable-energy-transition coalitions in both Ecuador and Peru. Chapter 1 describes the general context in which this scientific project is developed and presents a synthesis of the processes and its main outcomes. The research results are described in detail in the scientific papers presented in chapters 2, 3 and 4.
Does grass-roots civic engagement improve the quality of public services in countries in which formal oversight institutions are weak? It is obvious that formal oversight institutions are weak in developing countries, which causes low-quality public services. This weakness is particularly critical in the health sector - a service domain of crucial relevance for development. This observation has led practitioners to believe that the direct engagement of the beneficiaries of public services is a means to compensate the weakness of oversight institutions and to improve the quality of these services. Given that beneficiaries have incentives to demand good quality services, it is indeed logical to assume that their participation in the monitoring of public services helps to improve the quality of these very services. This positive view of grass-roots civic engagement resonates with the idea that an active civil society helps a political system to build up and sustain a high institutional performance In the eyes of the donors of development aid, this idea nurtures the expectation that strengthening civic engagement contributes to increased aid effectiveness. Accordingly, donor countries have increased their efforts to strengthen beneficiary participation since the 1990s, which moved the concepts of voice and accountability center-stage in the international development discourse. However, whether citizens' capacity to exercise pressure on service providers and public officials really improves the effectiveness of development aid remains an unresolved question. Building upon recent experimental and comparative case study evidence, the thesis examines the role of citizens' engagement in the effectiveness of development interventions. The focus is on such interventions in the health sector because population health is particularly critical for prosperity and development, and ultimately for democratization. The key question addressed is if and under what conditions ordinary people's engagement in collective action and their inclination to raise their voice improves the effectiveness of development assistance for health (DAH). I analyze this question from an interactionist viewpoint, unraveling the complex interplay of civic engagement and health aid with three key institutional variables: (i) state capacity, (ii) liberal democracy and (iii) decentralized government. Drawing upon social capital theory, principal-agent theory, and selectorate theory, I provide compelling evidence that health aid effectiveness depends on (a) bottom-up processes of demand from service users as well as (b) formal processes of top-down monitoring and horizontal oversight arrangements. In other words, the very interaction of behavioral and institutional factors drives the accountability in public service provision and thus the effectiveness of development assistance for health in recipient countries.
Nongovernmental organisations often criticize the working conditions at foreign suppliers – especially those in Asia and Latin America – of Western brands. In response, many brands have established codes of conduct in order to set binding social standards for their suppliers. Audits are conducted to monitor their implementation; however, substantial improvement of labour conditions has not been achieved. Therefore, brands are increasingly shifting their efforts towards building the capacity of their suppliers themselves to enhance the implementation of social standards. The creation of participative organisation structures that involve workers in decision-making processes regarding working conditions is often a focus of such novel training programmes. In light of these developments, this study will examine if a positive relationship exists between worker participation initiated by management and the improvement of working conditions in factories. In the theoretical part of the study, motivational and cognitive models as well as aspects of power-sharing and decision-making processes are used to examine the influence of participation on working conditions. Moreover, requirements for successful participation structures are developed. The Western discourse on influence mechanisms is complemented by political, economic, legal and cultural conditions in China related to participation and the implementation of social standards. The case study in this dissertation is based on research at seven garment factories in China which took part in the public-private-partnership project „Worldwide Enhancement of Social Quality“ initiated by the German retailer Tchibo GmbH and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, a German federal enterprise for international cooperation in the field of sustainable development. The goal of the three-year project was to initiate participative dialogue structures and to provide technical knowledge regarding the implementation of social standards in 40 factories in China, Bangladesh and Thailand. In order to examine the influence of worker participation in the Chinese facilities, a quantitative survey of 390 workers and 70 worker representatives, as well as interviews with 15 managers, nine project members and one representative from the International Labour Organisation China were conducted. The research results indicate that worker involvement contributes to the improvement of the economic and social performance of factories. In particular, the rise in trust between management and the workforce, and the inclusion of workers’ valuable input contributed to the positive change. In order to make full use of the potential of participation, workers’ and managers’ motivation, key competences for participation, training activities as well as time resources are of importance. China is undergoing a period of transformation. Although until now no independent unions are allowed in China, employee involvement offers the opportunity for workers to become part of decision-making processes in the factories, thereby supporting democratisation tendencies in the country.
During recent decades, the arenas of political decision-making have increasingly shifted from national governments to intergovernmental and transnational political forums. At the same time, the number and relevance of non-state actors in international politics is steadily growing. These trends have led political scientists to study and theorize about new forms of democracy beyond the national political arenas (Archibugi 2004, Bexell et al. 2010, Nasström 2010). However, democracy beyond the nation state is difficult to conceptualize with the idea of an institutionalized democracy within the borders of nation-states. Instead, many political scientists emphasize the role of civil society actors as a cure for the democratic deficit in inter-national politics (Steffek & Nanz 2008). Yet, normative and empirical problems arise over the extent of access, selection and role of civil society actors in international organizations (Tallberg et al. 2013). Furthermore, the normative relevance of transnational civil society actors makes it necessary to study their own democratic legitimacy. While international organizations are mostly institutionalized and hierarchical governing bodies, the ever growing diffuse conglomerate of non-state actors is characterized by fluid structures, blurry boundaries and a multi-level setting of interaction (Keck & Sikkink 1998). Thus, in studying democratic practice in transnational civil society networks, we must ask: How institutionalized do political practices have to be and how flexible can they be, to still be considered democratic? Normative theorists reconceptualized democracy in the light of this changing context (Bohman 2007). Recent concepts of participatory, deliberative and representative democracy attempt to reconfigure existing democratic institutions through procedural elements (Fung & Wright 2003, Dryzek 2006) or innovative forms of representation (Phillips 1998, Mansbridge 2003, Castiglione & Warren 2006). This emerging theoretical framework is well suited to analyze the extent, to which democratic practices exist within transnational civil society networks. By applying the concept of practice (Giddens 1984, Schatzki et al. 2005) as a bridging tool between the empirical reality of fluid, temporary and open transnational civil society networks on the one hand and the institution-oriented democratic theory on the other hand, this study explores the extent to which democratic practice develops in a field that lacks traditional institutions to guarantee citizen participation. As innovative transnational actors, civil society networks can bring up new forms of democratic practice (see Polletta 2006) that can potentially inspire the debate about transnational democracy as such. This study, with its innovate approach, hopes to invigorate the debate about transnational democracy and transnational civil society, which has stalled to some degree in recent years. The study is divided into three parts; first, a conceptual part that clarifies the question of how democracy as practice can be theoretically conceptualized in transnational civil society net-works, which is followed by an empirical exploration of political practices in the transnational civil society networks. In this second part, the main question is how participation, representation and deliberation practice develops in transnational civil society networks. Two cases of transnational civil society networks, the Clean Clothes Campaign and Friends of the Earth, are analyzed to provide insights into the democratic practice within transnational civil society. In the final part, the empirical findings are evaluated in the light of the outlined concepts of democratic theory in order to explore how democratic these political practices actually are. The study identifies implicit and in-process practices of democratic norms in transnational civil society networks. Political practice in transnational civil society networks can become demo-cratic through empowerment measures and trustful relationships. However, deliberate demo-cratic practice can be impeded by disembodied digital communication and complex decision-making. The study explores how new forms of democratic practice emerge in the interaction between political actors and the structural environments of actors and networks.