Institut für Management und Organisation (IMO)
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Dissertation (11)
- Arbeitspapier (6)
- Research Paper (3)
- Bachelorarbeit (1)
- Habilitation (1)
Sprache
- Deutsch (13)
- Englisch (8)
- Mehrsprachig (1)
Schlagworte
- Beratung (1)
- Bevölkerungsentwicklung (1)
- Client-consultant relationship (1)
- Eigeninitiative (1)
- Entrepreneurship (1)
- Entwicklungsländer (1)
- Evolutionstheorie (1)
- Institutional theory (1)
- Institutionelle Theorie (1)
- Klienten-Berater-Beziehung (1)
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been established in recent years as an essential component of the economic system, demanded and promoted by a wide variety of stakeholder groups. The present dissertation shows that organizations face major communicative challenges with regard to CSR. CSR is not only determined by organizations themselves, but rather arises in the interplay with economic and social discourses. It is assumed that boundarys of organizational action are under constant change, so that CSR actors inevitably initiate constitutive communication processes. The resulting polyphony requires an understanding of the underlying communication processes. Hence, the performative character of CSR communication is taken up by this dissertation and thus the constitution of both the communicating actors and their relationships in the network is illustrated. The presented scientific papers are united by the overarching assumption that communication does not accompany and describe organizational action, but unfolds its own power.
The choice to continue working until or even beyond retirement is a function of the interplay of factors on micro, meso, and macro levels. Research within this area has grown significantly over the last years. I contribute to this line of research with the studies conducted within the scope of this cumulative habilitation thesis. More specifically, the aim of the research presented here is to add to the literature on later life work with the investigation of individual (micro level) as well as job and organizational (meso level) factors that have the potential to contribute to prolonged working lives. I was guided by the general research interest on how individual, job, and organizational factors contribute to later life work, and more specifically to retirement timing and work-related activities beyond normal retirement age. My research was directed by the following research questions: (1) What is the work activity potential of older people in Germany and what characterizes different types of later life work potential? (2) Which role do individual psychological factors such as personality, values, and beliefs play in the context of later life work? (3) How do specific job characteristics interact or align with individual psychological factors with regard to later life work? (4) What characterizes a holistic organizational approach to later life work that helps the alignment of the work environment to older workers’ (individual) needs and abilities?
Following an introduction, I give an overview on the theoretical framework of my research in Chapter 2 (“Theoretical Background”). I describe the conceptualization of later life work before I go into multilevel antecedents of later life work and present key theoretical approaches to a person-environment fit perspective of later life work. In the following four chapters, I present ten studies corresponding to the ten scientific publications that constitute the basis of the cumulative habilitation thesis.
In Chapter 3 (“Later Life Work: Work Activity Potential”) I present research on the extent as well as different types of later life work potential in Germany to describe the context for most of my research. With the two studies presented here (Büsch, Zohr, Brusch, Deller, Schermuly, Stamov-Roßnagel, & Wöhrmann, 2015; Mergenthaler, Wöhrmann, & Staudinger; 2015), I also intend to provide answers to the research question on the later life work potential in Germany and the characteristics of different later life work potential constellations. In Chapter 4 (“Later Life Work: Individual Psychological Factors”) the role of stable as well as malleable individual psychological factors for later life work is explored in two studies (Fasbender, Wöhrmann, Wang, & Klehe, 2019; Wöhrmann, Fasbender, & Deller, 2016). Thus, with the studies presented in this chapter, I contribute to the research question on the role of individual psychological factors in the context of later life work. In Chapter 5 (“Later Life Work: Job Characteristics Corresponding to Older Workers’ Needs and Abilities”) I present three studies exploring the interplay of individual factors and job characteristics for later life work to address the research question on the interaction or alignment of specific job characteristics with individual psychological factors with regard to later life work (Pundt, Wöhrmann, Deller, & Shultz, 2015; Wöhrmann, Brauner, & Michel, 2020; Wöhrmann, Fasbender, & Deller; 2017). Chapter 6 (“Later Life Work: A Holistic Organizational Approach”) reports the development of the Later Life Workplace Index (LLWI) as a multidimensional tool to holistically assess organizational practices and working conditions targeted at the promotion of later life work through the maintenance and enhancement of older employees’ health, work ability, and motivation (Wilckens, Wöhrmann, Adams, Deller, & Finkelstein, 2020; Wilckens, Wöhrmann, Deller, & Wang, 2020; Wöhrmann, Pundt, & Deller, 2018. With the LLWI, I intend to provide an answer to the research question on the characteristics of a holistic organizational approach to later life work that helps the alignment of the work environment to older workers’ (individual) needs and abilities. Finally, in Chapter 7 (“General Discussion”) I discuss the contributions, implications, and limitations of my research presented here.
Understanding that entrepreneurship can be better modeled from a systemic point of view is a primordial aspect that determines the important role of universities in entrepreneurial ecosystems. What makes the ecosystem approach a valuable tool for understanding social systems is that, from a holistic perspective, their behavior seems to have emerging characteristics. The impact of this “research object” can only be revealed through interrelated causal chains similar to the behavior of natural ecosystems (Mars et al., 2012). Therefore, the entrepreneurial ecosystem concept provides a unique perspective that complements previous studies on networked economic activity with a clear focus on the systemic elements that support entrepreneurship, and an emphasis on policy that promote the entrepreneurial process.
This dissertation presents a dual scientific account of the entrepreneurship phenomenon in universities. The work is divided into two equal parts, each of which is composed of two research papers. The narrative of the first half takes on a macro perspective view, consisting of one theoretical and one empirically-based conceptual case study. This part conceptually depicts a systematic approach to entrepreneurialism in higher education, namely an ecosystems perspective. The second half concentrates on the meso- and micro levels of study from the university’s point of view, comprising of a case study as historical account for the emergence of the entrepreneurial university, and of a metasynthesis of empirical case studies in entrepreneurial universities, which serves as the basis for the development of entrepreneurial university archetypes.
This doctoral work contributes to an in-depth understanding of Entrepreneurship in universities regarding its systemic qualities and archetypal characteristics of entrepreneurial universities. It argues for an ecosystem’s perspective on the phenomenon of entrepreneurial activity, highlighting the fundamental role that universities play as the heart of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Furthermore, this research expands on the novel concept of the entrepreneurial university by using extensive case study literature to empirically identify distinct archetypes that better reflect the diverse reality of how universities engage as entrepreneurial actors by way of differentiated entrepreneurial structures, systems, and strategies.
Das Allgemeine Verhaltensmodell von March und Simon verknüpft vier fundamentale Konstrukte der Verhaltenstheorie: das Anspruchsniveau, die Belohnungserwartung, die Zufriedenheit und die Suche nach Verhaltensweisen, die Erfolg und Zufriedenheit versprechen. Die Teilmechanismen, die in dem Modell postuliert werden, verknüpfen sich zu einem Gesamtmechanismus, der dafür sorgt, dass das Verhältnis von Ansprüchen und Möglichkeiten zum Ausgleich kommt. Eine wichtige Rolle spielen die Parameter des Modells, die die Voraussetzungen und Stärke der Zusammenhänge bestimmen. Neben formalen Funktionen kommt diesen Parametern auch jeweils eine wichtige inhaltliche Bedeutung zu. Der vorliegende Beitrag trägt zur Erkundung des Modells und seiner Implikationen bei.
Das Modell verdient eine größere Beachtung, als ihm bislang geschenkt wurde. Es beschreibt einen fundamentalen Verhaltensmechanismus, der in praktisch allen Bereichen menschlichen Verhaltens wirksam ist. Das Modell besitzt nicht nur eine große Erklärungskraft, es ist außerdem logisch stimmig, kompakt und elegant. Außerdem erweist es sich als in hohem Grad anschlussfähig für eine Vielzahl von theoretischen Ansätzen und empirischen Erkundungen. Es lässt sich anwenden für die Erklärung von allgemeinen Zusammenhängen, für die Beschreibung konkreter Vorgänge und für die Simulation einer Vielzahl von Handlungskonstellationen.
The dissertation consists of three scientific papers and a synopsis. The synopsis addresses the relevance of the dissertation and lists the key factors for the sustainability transition in the electricity system as a common denominator of the three papers.
The relevance of the dissertation results, on the one hand, from the urgency of the sustainability transition in the electricity system and an insufficient transition willingness of the eastern European Member States. On the other hand, the Multi-Level-Perspective as one of the most important scientific frameworks to grasp transitions does not provide a sufficient explanation of its mechanisms. Moreover, Demand Response aggregators as new enterprises on the European electricity market and potential reform initiators are still under researched. The following key factors for the sustainability transition of the electricity system have been identified: supply security concerns, Europeanisation, policy making and the dominance of short-term oriented economic evaluation.
Paper 1
The underlying factors in the uptake of electricity demand response: The case of Poland
Author: Katarzyna Ewa Rollert
Published: Utilities Policy, Volume 54, October 2018, 11-21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2018.07.002
Demand response (DR) is considered crucial for a more reliable, sustainable, and efficient electricity system. Nevertheless, DR’s potential still remains largely untapped in Europe. This study sheds light on the roots of this problem in the context of Poland. It suggests that unfavorable regulation is symptomatic of the real, underlying barriers. In Poland, these barriers are coal dependence and political influence on energy enterprises. As main drivers, supply security concerns, EU regulatory pressure, and a positive cost-benefit profile of DR in comparison to alternatives, are revealed. A conceptual model of DR uptake in electricity systems is proposed.
Paper 2
Gaining legitimacy for sustainability transition: A social mechanisms approach
Authors: Ursula Weisenfeld and Katarzyna Ewa Rollert
Review and re-submit: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions / August 2021
Applying a social mechanisms approach to the Multi-Level Perspective, we conceptualize mechanisms of socio-technical transitions and of gaining legitimacy for transitions as co-evolutionary drivers and outcomes. Situational, action-formational, and transformational mechanisms that operate as drivers of change in a socio-technical transition require corresponding framing and framing contests to achieve legitimacy for that transition. We illustrate our conceptual insight with the case of the coal dependent Polish electricity system.
Paper 3
Demand response aggregators as institutional entrepreneurs in the European electricity market
Author: Katarzyna Ewa Rollert
Under review: Journal of Cleaner Production / August 2021
Demand Response (DR) aggregators act as intermediaries between electricity customers and network operators to tap the potential of the demand-based flexibility. This qualitative study reveals DR aggregators as institutional entrepreneurs that struggle to reform the still largely supply-oriented European electricity market. Unfavourable regulation, low value of flexibility, resource constraints, complexity, and customer acquisition are the key challenges DR aggregators face. To overcome them they apply a combination of strategies: lobbying, market education, technological proficiency, and upscaling the business. The study highlights DR aggregation as an architectural innovation that alters the interplay between key actors of the electricity system and provides policy recommendations including the necessity to assess the real value of DR in comparison to other flexibility sources by taking all externalities into account, a technology-neutral approach to market design and the need for simplification of DR programmes, and common standards to reduce complexity and uncertainty for DR providers.
This dissertation focused on the nature and role of organizational practices for the employment of older people and the extension of their working lives. The set of four articles is driven by the objective to further deepen our understanding of how organizations can facilitate ageing at work to the benefit of both, employees and employers. Findings are empirically based on qualitative expert interview data from Germany and the U.S. and several quantitative field studies among older employees in Germany. To bridge gaps in measurement of organizational practices related to aging at work, this dissertation proposes a new comprehensive, multifaceted, and thoroughly conceptualized measure of organizational practices related to aging at work, the Later Life Workplace Index (LLWI). Through the course of the four articles the LLWI is conceptually developed based on qualitative interview data, operationalized, validated based on multiple field studies among older workers, and applied in a multi-level study among older employees of 101 organizations. Results suggest that organizational practices are not uniform, but multifaceted in their presence within organizations and their effects for the employment of older workers. The LLWI distinguishes nine domains of practices including an age-friendly organizational climate, work design, individual development, and practices tailoring the retirement transition. Thus, it may lay the foundation for more granular organizational level research in the field. Further, this dissertation’s fourth article applies the LLWI and argues based on person-environment fit and socio-emotional selectivity theory that organizational practices address different individual needs and, thus, affect employment depending on employees’ individual characteristics. Results suggest that older employees’ retirement intentions are effected by individual development, transition-to-retirement, and continued employment practices depending on their health resources. Application of the new measure in practice to improve organizations’ response to the aging workforce and opportunities for future research based on the LLWI are discussed.
Der vorliegende Beitrag befasst sich mit der Soziographie der Arbeitszufriedenheit. In Studien zur Arbeitszufriedenheit werden oziographische Merkmale oft als Kontrollgrößen eingesetzt. Ihre Berücksichtigung bei der Datenanalyse soll die Frage beantworten, ob sich der Einfluss von Determinanten der Arbeitszufriedenheit (Arbeitsinhalte, Arbeitsbedingungen, persönli-che Dispositionen usw.) für unterschiedliche Personengruppen und Situationen jeweils anders darstellt. Die Berücksichtigung von Kontrollgrößen macht aber nur dann Sinn, wenn diese selbst eine empirische Beziehung entweder zu den Determinanten der Arbeitszufriedenheit und/oder zu der Arbeitszufriedenheit selbst aufweisen. Dem vorliegenden Beitrag geht es um die Frage, ob sich Zusammenhänge zwischen bedeutsamen soziographischen Merkmalen und der Arbeitszufriedenheit aufzeigen lassen. Als Datengrundlage dienen die 35 Erhebungswellen des Sozioökonomischen Panels (SOEP) von 1984 bis 2018. Im Einzelnen betrachtet werden die Variablen Erwerbsstatus, Geschlecht, Alter, Schulabschluss, Hochschulabschluss, Berufsstatus, Betriebszugehörigkeit und Unternehmensgröße. Für die meisten dieser Größen ergeben sich, wenn überhaupt, nur sehr schwache statistische Beziehungen mit der Arbeitszufriedenheit. Eine Ausnahme macht der Berufsstatus. Die Qualifikationsanforderungen, die sich damit verknüpfen und die hierarchische Position haben einen beachtlichen Einfluss auf die Arbeitszufriedenheit. Bemerkenswert ist die große Stabilität der Befunde über alle Erhebungsjahre von 1984 bis 2018 hinweg.
Im vorliegenden Beitrag geht es um die Veränderung der Arbeitszufriedenheit und um die Identifikation von zeitlichen Verlaufsmustern der Arbeitszufriedenheit. Als Grundlage der Analyse dienen die Daten des Sozioökonomischen Panels aus mittlerweile 35 Erhebungswellen (1984 bis 2018). Die Analyse umfasst 3.345 Zeitreihen, die jeweils einen Zeitraum von 15 Jahren umspannen. Zur Typisierung der einzelnen Arbeitszufriedenheitsverläufe werden die Regressionsrechnung und die Clusteranalyse verwendet. Der Haupttypus folgt dem generellen Trend, wonach die Arbeitszufriedenheit, von einem mäßig hohen Niveau ausgehend, stagniert bzw. sich im Lauf der Zeit leicht vermindert. Es gibt daneben allerdings auch Fälle, die auf einem hohen Arbeitszufriedenheitsniveau verbleiben. Und auf der anderen Seite findet man nicht wenige Personen, deren Arbeitszufriedenheit im negativen Bereich verharrt. Eine weitere Gruppe wird von Personen gebildet, deren Arbeits-zufriedenheit relativ großen Schwankungen ausgesetzt ist. Von den soziographischen Variablen Alter, Geschlecht und Berufsstatus gehen keine nennenswerten Wirkungen aus. Eine gesonderte Betrachtung der Unternehmensgröße erbringt, dass Personen, die dauerhaft in einem Kleinbetrieb arbeiten, eine größere Arbeitszufriedenheit aufweisen als Personen in größeren Unternehmen. Neben der Darstellung der inhaltlichen Einsichten, die die Zeitreihenanalyse erbringt, erfolgt eine Diskussion über die Verwendung der Modellergebnisse für auf die Zukunft gerichtete Szenario-Analyse.
Der vorliegende Beitrag beschäftigt sich, wie zwei vorangegangene Berichte, mit den Arbeits-bedingungen von Unternehmern. Als Analysebasis dienen die Daten des European Survey on Working Conditions aus den Jahren 2000, 2005 und 2010 sowie, nun ergänzend, die Daten aus der Erhebung aus dem Jahr 2015. Über die vier Erhebungswellen hinweg betrachtet ergeben sich, was die Beschreibung der Arbeitssituation der Unternehmer angeht, keine wesentlichen Verän-derungen. Die Unternehmer sind, was ihre Arbeitsbedingungen angeht, zum Teil, aber nicht durchgängig, besser gestellt als die übrigen Erwerbspersonen. Grundlage der Analyse ist ein ein-faches Modell, das positive und negative Aspekte der Arbeitssituation gegenüberstellt. Aus the-oretischer Sicht von Interesse sind die sich wechselseitig verstärkenden Effekte von Belastungs- und Motivationsfaktoren.
Personally meaningful tourist experiences foster subjective mental wellbeing. Modern, human-centred technologies such as gamified technology have been recognised as a promising means to support tourists in their co-creation of meaningful tourist experiences. However, a deeper understanding and conceptualisation of tourists’ engagement with gamified technologies in the tourist experience has remained absent so far.
This study draws on positive psychology as the guiding theoretical lens to conceptualise and explore tourists’ underlying motives for engaging with gamified technology, as well as the gratifications thereof for the tourist experience. In doing so, this thesis identifies how tourists generate meaning through interacting with gamified technology in the tourist experience, thereby fostering the co-creation of meaningful tourist experiences and contributing to subjective mental wellbeing. Being among the first studies to link the concepts of positive psychology, gamified technology, and tourist experiences, the results of this thesis provide rich findings on the underlying motives for tourists to engage with gamified technology during vacation, as well as the gratifications of gamified technology for the creation of meaning in the tourist experience.
Using the theoretical lens of positive psychology and achievement motivation theory as the main theoretical underpinning, this study is positioned at the intersection of social psychology, human-computer interaction, and tourism as the field of application. Conceptually, this thesis provides an in-depth understanding of tourists’ engagement with gamified technology, including the socio-psychological motivators for engagement and the outcomes thereof for the tourist experience.
This thesis contributes to the theoretical advancement of two principal streams: a) tourists’ motives for engaging with gamified technologies and the gratifications thereof in the vacation context and b) the understanding of motivational affordances of gamified technology in general. The substantial theoretical contribution of this study is the advancement of knowledge as it demonstrates the value of gamified technologies in the tourist experience. The findings eventually provide tourism destinations with nuanced insights into the feature-specific values of gamified technology to contribute to the co-creation of meaningful tourist experiences.