TIME for REFL-ACTION: Interpersonal Competence Development in Project-based Sustainability Courses
(2021)
This dissertation investigates interpersonal competence development in project-based sustainability courses. Visions of a sustainable, safe, and just future cannot be reached by one individual alone. Thus, future change agents need to be able to collaborate and engage with stakeholders, to approach the manifold crises, challenges, problems, and conflicts we are facing together, and to promote and push forward sustainability transitions and transformations. Therefore, this research investigates three project-based sustainability graduate courses by comparing and contrasting teaching and learning outcomes, processes, and environments. A comparative case study approach using a Grounded Theory-inspired research design which triangulates several qualitative methods and perspectives is applied to allow for generalizable insights. Thereby, this dissertation provides empirically-informed insights which are further discussed in relation to selected teaching and learning theories. This leads, first, to a discussion of practical implications within (and beyond) sustainability higher education; and second, provides a theoretical foundation for interpersonal competence development in project-based learning settings – so that educating future change agents can gain momentum. Findings of this research show that embracing conflicts when they occur (i.e. before they provoke cascading effects in the form of further conflicts down-the-road) is an effective strategy to help further develop interpersonal competence. This requires a conflict-embracing attitude. Attitude, in general, seems to be key in interpersonal competence and competence development overall. Self-reflection, if not explicitly required by outside influences (such as instructors), arises naturally from a self-reflective attitude, and is shown to provide the basis for developing interpersonal competence. This research introduces the term "Refl-Action" which stresses the importance of pairing "learning by doing" (as is often the focus in project-based learning settings) with conscious moments of "reflecting about the doing". More specifically, the research presented here identified four learning processes for interpersonal competence development: receiving input, experiencing, reflecting, and experimenting. Based on the empirical data, when the four processes are purposefully combined, following a meaningful sequence attitudes, knowledge, and skills in collaborative teamwork and impactful stakeholder engagement, are fostered (two facets of interpersonal competence). Each of the four learning processes is set in motion through various interactions students engage in during project-based sustainability courses: student-student (labeled "peer"), student-instructor (labeled "deliberate"), student-stakeholder (labeled "professional"), and student-mentor (labeled "supportive") interactions. When these interactions are made explicit subjects of inquiry - i.e. the (inter-)action is linked with (self-)reflection – different learning processes complement one another: Interpersonal competence facets (collaborative teamwork and impactful stakeholder engagement) and domains (attitudes, knowledge, skills) are fostered. While, overall, interactions, processes, and conflicts have been identified as supportive for interpersonal competence development, trust has emerged as another variable inviting further investigation.
This dissertation addresses the question of how sustainability curricula can be implemented and established in higher education institutions. Universities – as hubs for knowledge generation, innovation, and education – provide a central leverage point for sustainably developing society at large. Therefore, the institutionalization of sustainability curricula is not only socially demanded, but also stipulated in numerous political statements from the international community (e.g., those of the UN and UNESCO) and operationalized via Sustainable Development Goal No. 4: "Quality Education". Previous findings on how such implementation can be successful and what factors support or inhibit the process have come primarily through case studies of individual higher education institutions. These studies have been largely descriptive rather than analytical and leave open questions about the generalizability of their findings. The present dissertation addresses this research gap. Through a meta-study (i.e., an analytical comparison of existing case studies), generalizable findings on the implementation processes of sustainability curricula are explored. In the first step, a case universe was collected in order to provide a database for deeper analyses. In two further analysis steps that built on the case universe from Step 1, certain factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of sustainability curricula (Step 2) and specific implementation patterns (Step 3) were examined. The presented findings add a complementary empirical perspective to the discourse on the establishment of education for sustainable development (ESD) at higher education institutions. First, the case studies that specifically address the implementation processes of sustainability curricula are reviewed and analyzed here for the first time as part of a research landscape. This research landscape reveals where research on such implementation processes has been or is being conducted. On this basis, both researchers and funders can reflect on the status quo and plan further research or funding endeavors. Second, this dissertation offers the opportunity to compare a multitude of individual case studies and thus to develop new and generalizable insights into the implementation of sustainability curricula. The empirical analysis uses 133 case studies to identify key factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of sustainability curricula and to add a complementary perspective to the discourse, which has thus far been dominated by theoretical considerations and individual case studies. The analysis thereby offers a new perspective on generalizable influencing factors that appear to be important across different contexts. Thus far, specific patterns of implementation processes have been infrequently studied, and with few datasets. This dissertation analyzes the complex interplay between over 100 variables and provides one of the first research attempts at better understanding the processes that lead to the deep-rooted and comprehensive implementation of sustainability curricula. Internal and external practitioners of higher education institutions can find examples and evidence that can be useful in planning the next steps of their sustainability curriculum implementation. This dissertation offers generalizable empirical findings on how universities can succeed in recognizing their own responsibility to that end and in realizing this transformation through the implementation of ESD.
Das Bildungskonzept Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung (BNE) gilt als Schlüsselfaktor für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung. Die Stärkung der Kompetenzen von Multiplikatoren und somit Lehrkräften als Gestalter formaler Bildung ist ein Ziel auf dem Weg zu einer qualitativ hochwertigen Bildung. Es gilt, im Verlauf der Lehrkräftebildung Möglichkeiten zu schaffen, die Entwicklung relevanter Kompetenzen gezielt zu unterstützen, um effektivere Ergebnisse im Bereich BNE zu erreichen. Für den universitären Teil der Lehrkräftebildung geht dies einher mit einer entsprechenden Gestaltung von Lernumgebungen, durch die angehende Lehrkräfte relevante Kompetenzen zu Beginn ihres individuellen Bildungsweges entwickeln können. Darüber hinaus sollen durch entsprechende Fort- und Weiterbildungsformate auch bereits im Schuldienst tätige Lehrkräfte erreicht werden. Das als transdisziplinäres Format angelegte Entwicklungsteam Sachunterricht, bestehend aus Sachunterrichtslehrkräften, Vertretern außerschulischer Bildungsorte und Forschenden der Universität, bildet den Ausgangspunkt dieser Arbeit. Die vorliegende Arbeit fokussiert die Untersuchung von Möglichkeiten der Professionalisierung von (angehenden) Lehrkräften zu BNE im Kontext des Entwicklungsteams. Dazu wurde zunächst theoretisch-konzeptionell der Frage nachgegangen, welche Kompetenzen relevant für die Integration von BNE in Schule und Unterricht sind und wie Lehr-Lernsettings gestaltet werden sollten, um die Entwicklung entsprechender Kompetenzen zu unterstützen. Im Rahmen zweier empirischer Studien wurde anschließend einerseits die Kompetenzentwicklung seitens der Studierenden analysiert, die an einem durch das Entwicklungsteam begleiteten Seminar teilnahmen. Andererseits liegt der Fokus auf dem spezifischen Format des transdisziplinären Entwicklungsteams und es wurde untersucht, inwiefern wechselseitiges Lernen zwischen den Entwicklungsteammitgliedern initiiert werden und dies in einer Veränderung der pädagogischen Praxis resultieren kann. Aufgrund seiner hohen Anschlussfähigkeit an den bildungswissenschaftlichen Diskurs wurde das Modell der BNE-spezifischen professionellen Handlungskompetenz den konzeptionellen Überlegungen und den darauf aufbauenden empirischen Untersuchungen zugrunde gelegt. Die Gestaltung eines Lehr-Lern-Settings für angehende Lehrkräfte mit dem Ziel der Förderung entsprechender Kompetenzen wurde anhand des Konzepts der offenen Lernumgebung vorgenommen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen zum einen, dass das in enger Zusammenarbeit mit dem Entwicklungsteam als offene Lernumgebung durchgeführte Seminar die Professionalisierung der Studierenden unterstützt und der Aufbau von (BNE-spezifischer) professioneller Handlungskompetenz durch kollaboratives Gestalten in Kooperation mit der Praxis ermöglicht wird. Zum anderen zeigt sich, dass die transdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit ein wechselseitiges von- und miteinander Lernen zu BNE im Entwicklungsteam Sachunterricht fördert und Professionalisierungsprozesse sowohl seitens der Lehrkräfte als auch des außerschulischen Akteurs zumindest in einigen Bereichen angestoßen wurden.
A Matter of Connection: Competence Development in Teacher Education for Sustainable Development
(2021)
Based on a dual case study, this cumulative dissertation investigates how individual "education for sustainable development" (ESD) courses, as part of the teacher education programs at Leuphana University in Lüneburg/Germany and Arizona State University (ASU)/USA, actually foster students' ESD-specific professional action competence. Furthermore, this work sheds light on the link between learning processes and outcomes, to reveal which factors actually affect the achievement of ILOs and competence development. The findings of this study indicate that both courses under investigation eventually live up to their role and increased student teachers' competence and commitment to implement ESD in their future careers; yet, mainly due to their different thematic foci, to varying degrees. Additionally, the four Cs (personal, professional, social, and structural connections) were revealed as significant factors that support students' learning and should be considered when planning and designing course offerings in TESD, with the goal of developing students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes.