Filtern
Schlagworte
- Handwerksbetrieb (2)
- deregulation (2)
- natural monopoly (2)
- Ausbildungsplatz (1)
- Betriebliche Ausbildung (1)
- Deregulierung (1)
- Energieweltwirtschaft (1)
- Handwerk (1)
- Handwerkskammer Lüneburg-Stade (1)
- Interessenverband (1)
- Kraftfahrtversicherung (1)
- Kreishandwerkerschaft Lüneburg (1)
- Lüneburg (1)
- Monopol (1)
- Natürliches Monopol (1)
- Regulierung (1)
- Risikoanalyse (1)
- Telekommunikationsmarkt (1)
- Verband der Netzbetreiber (1)
- Versicherung (1)
- Wettbewerb (1)
- Wirtschaftspolitk (1)
- interest groups (1)
- power industry (1)
Für die Neufassung der Handwerksordnung zum 1.1.2004 war die hohe Ausbildungsleistung des Handwerks ein zentrales Argument, die im Falle einer überzogenen Deregulierung einbrechen würde. Folgt man der ökonomischen Theorie werden Handwerksbetriebe ausbilden, wenn der erwartete Nutzen die erwarteten Kosten überwiegt; Ausbildung wird zum unternehmerischen Erfolgsfaktor. Die zweimalige Befragung Lüneburger Handwerksbetriebe, die im Rahmen eines Projektes zur Regulierung auf dem deutschen Handwerksmarkt in Zusammenarbeit mit der Kreishandwerkerschaft Lüneburg durchgeführt wurde, zeigt, dass vor allem die Ausbildungsaktivität selbst zu einer guten bis sehr guten wirtschaftlichen Lage führt bzw. diese verbessert. Allerdings ist dieser Effekt nach relativ kurzer Frist (zwei Jahre oder mehr) wieder verschwunden.
Handwerksreform 2004 - Rückwirkungen auf das Ausbildungsverhalten Lüneburger Handwerksbetriebe?
(2006)
Die Befragung Lüneburger Handwerksbetriebe, die im Rahmen eines Projektes zur Regulierung auf dem deutschen Handwerksmarkt in Zusammenarbeit mit der Kreishandwerkerschaft Lüneburg durchgeführt wurde, soll Auswirkungen der Anfang 2004 erfolgten Handwerksreform erfassen. Dabei liegt der Schwerpunkt dieses Artikels auf der Ausbildungsleistung des Handwerks. Die theoretischen Ansätze zur Erklärung betrieblicher Lehrstellenangebote sollen mit den Ergebnissen der ersten Befragungsrunde über die Determinanten der Ausbildungsentscheidung im Lüneburger Handwerk konfrontiert werden.
Reviewing the development of network access charges in the German electricity market since 2002 reveals significant variation. While some firms continually increased or decreased their access charges, a variety of firms exhibited discontinuous behavior with price changes in both directions. From an economic viewpoint this price setting turbulence is astonishing because grid operators are non-contestable natural monopolists, which in this time period were regulated by Negotiated Third Party Access (NTPA). Depending on the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of NTPA, expected behavior would be either regulated average cost prices or monopoly prices, but not the observed turbulence. Although in 2005 NTPA scheme was replaced by a Regulated Third Party Access (RTPA) scheme with a regulator, an analysis of the factors influencing the price setting behavior within this period offers valuable information for the new regulator and the still discussed new incentive regulation, which is expected to start in 2009. Using multivariate estimations based on firm data covering the years 2000-2005, we test the hypotheses that asymmetric influence of regulatory threat, different cost and price calculation knowledge, strategic use of structural features and the obligation to publish specific access charges have influenced the electricity network access charges in Germany.
Die Anfang 2004 durchgeführten Reformen auf dem Handwerksmarkt hatten vor allem eine Erleichterung des Marktzutritts und damit mehr Wettbewerb zum Ziel. Die erwartete Zunahme der Anbieter, durch die es zu sinkenden Preisen und einer steigenden Nachfrage kommen soll, konnte zumindest auf Teilmärkten beobachtet werden. Der Artikel soll anhand von Beispielen des sehr heterogenen Handwerksmarkts aufzeigen, wie sich der Wettbewerb unter der Annahme unterschiedlicher mikroökonomischer Modellkonstellationen (vollständige Konkurrenz, Monopol, monopolistische Konkurrenz und Qualitätswettbewerb) entwickelt. Auf Grundlage einer Ende 2004 in Zusammenarbeit mit der Kreishandwerkerschaft Lüneburg durchgeführten Befragung Lüneburger Handwerksbetriebe sollen dazu erste ökonometrische Auswertungen vorgestellt werden, die sich mit den Auswirkungen der Reform auf die wirtschaftliche Lage der Betriebe befassen.
Despite the scepticism raised by the German Monopoly Commission our analysis shows that the revised theory of contestable markets can be applied to the telecommunications market better than expected. The original contestable market theory implied three assumptions necessary to be satisfied to establish potential competition: Free market entry, market exits possible without any costs, and the price adjustment lag exceeds the entry lag. Our analysis shows that if the incumbent reduces its prices slowly (high adjustment lag) and the market entry can be performed quickly (low entry lag), a new competitor will be able to earn back sunk costs. Therefore it is not necessary that all three conditions are complied with for potential competition to exist. We applied the 'revised' contestable market theory to the German telecommunication market and have been able to clearly identify the sections in which regulation is required. Under the present conditions local loops - which should be seen as natural monopolies - are not contestable due to sunk costs, high entry lags expected and a probable short price adjustment lag. Local loops can be identified as bottlenecks therefore. Regional and local connection networks should also be regulated because a high entry lag and a low price adjustment lag have to be expected as well as current competition does not exist today. The national connection network shows current competition between several network providers, hence regulation can be abolished in this field. Moreover, services can be supplied by several firms, and we predict strong potential competition.. There are no arguments favouring a natural monopoly in the section of terminals.
This paper studies the empirical effect of risk classification in the mandatory third-party motor insurance (TPMI) of Germany. We find evidence that inefficient risk categories had been selected in this market while potentially efficient information may have been dismissed. Risk classification did generally not improve the efficiency of contracting or the composition of insureds in this market. These findings can be partly explained by the existence of compulsory fixed coverage and other institutional restraints such as unitary owner insurance in this market.
The EU electricity directive (96/92/EC) established the right of the member states to choose between Regulated and Negotiated Third Party Access (RTPA and NTPA). The interest group theory is able to explain whether the introduction of NTPA in Germany had been an interest group equilibrium under the restriction of EU-directive. Using the NTPA associations of electricity power suppliers, network monopolists and industrial consumers negotiated three agreements. The last one (AA VVII+) in December 2001 introduced a market comparison scheme with three structural features: “East-/West-Germany”, “consumption/population density”, and “cable rate”. These features are variables which are supposed to reflect cost differences between network suppliers. The theoretical analysis will derive the hypothesis that this conception allows to introduce a cost irrelevant factor and therefore to increase prices without harming firms which do not hold this factor. This hypothesis could be tested by analyzing the German low and medium voltage network suppliers in 2002 and 2003. Our estimations show that the use of structural feature “East-/West Germany” and “consumption/population density” could be explained by this hypothesis. But because we have no firm specific information about cost differences other explanations could not be excluded: Monopoly prices differ with marginal costs, and regulation could reflect real cost differences. The third structural feature “cable rate” has no influence in low voltage networks, but has an impact on access charges levied in medium voltage networks. This relationship is only given if we use the borderlines given by AA VVII+. Hence, we are not able to reject the interest group theory: The feature “cable rate” was introduced successfully to increase access charges for medium network suppliers which have high cable rates without having higher costs.