Refine
Year of publication
- 2016 (4) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (4) (remove)
Keywords
- Abwasser (1)
- EU Water Framework Directive (1)
- Entdeckendes Lernen (1)
- Environmental Communication (1)
- Environmental governance (1)
- Fotografie (1)
- Nichtstaatliche Organisation (1)
- Non-Governmental Organisation (1)
- Summenparameter (1)
- Umweltkommunikation (1)
- Umwelttoxizität (1)
- water resources management (1)
Institute
- Fakultät Nachhaltigkeit (4) (remove)
This study aims to answer four main research questions regarding the roles, strategies, barriers, and representation of the media and environmental nongovernmental organisations (ENGOs) in environmental communication in Malaysia. From a theoretical lens, this study has incorporated the essential concepts of media, ENGOs, and environmental communication from both Western and Asian, particularly Malaysian perspectives as primary points of reference. For the purpose of this study, a total of 13 interviewees from Media A and Media B and 11 interviewees from ENGO A and ENGO B were chosen for the qualitative interview while 2,050 environmental articles were collected as samples from Media A´s and Media B´s newspapers along with ENGO A´s and ENGO B´s newsletters from the period 2012 to 2014 for the quantitative content analysis. Specifically, the findings from interview confirmed that both the Malaysian media and ENGOs have shared quite similar roles in environmental communication, particularly in environmental legitimacy (creating trust, credibility, and relationships with the public), in democracy (acting as a watchdog and mobilising the public sphere), and in constructing public mind about environmental problems. Pictures undoubtedly were one of the most vital tools in social construction, especially for presenting the reality of the environmental problems to the public. This was in harmony with the results of the quantitative content analysis, where more than 60% of pictures were found on environmental articles in media newspapers and ENGOs newsletters. Malaysian media and ENGOs have shared two common strategies in environmental communication, namely campaigning and collaboration with other stakeholders, while the ENGOs have two extra strategies: advocacy and lobbying strategies. Malaysian media and ENGOs also have collaborated with each other and the level of collaboration between them was at the coordination (medium) level. Both social actors especially the media were also relied heavily on their sources for environmental articles and the result of quantitative content analysis showed that the government was the main source for media newspapers, whereas other ENGOs and laypersons were the main sources for ENGOs´ newsletters. There are also colossal barriers faced by both Malaysian media and ENGOs throughout the process of environmental communication and some of the barriers faced by both media and ENGOs include the problem with limited knowledge of the environment, while some other barriers, like media laws and ownership, were only faced by the media; other barriers such as funding problems were specifically faced by the ENGOs. In terms of representation of environmental information, the Malaysian media make more presentations on environmental problems, especially on topics like floods, wildlife and water crises in their newspapers, while ENGOs have given more attention to environmental effort topics such as conservation and sustainable living in their newsletters. Surprisingly, not only the media but also the ENGOs used the same (news) values like timeliness, proximity, and impact as criteria for the selection of environmental issues for their publications. Other factors such as the background of the organisation and the interest of journalists or editors also influence the selection of environmental issues. It is hoped that the proposed theoretical framework of this study can serve as a crucial guideline for the development of environmental communication studies, especially among the media and ENGOs not only in Malaysia but also in other (Southeast) Asian regions that share a similar background.
In der vorliegenden Arbeit geht es um eine Bildpraxis, die an die Fotografie gekoppelt ist. Die Forschungsarbeit von Vera Brandner baut auf der These auf, dass die Fotografie aufgrund ihrer ´Undiszipliniertheit´ speziell in inter- und transdisziplinären sowie interkulturellen Forschungsfeldern dem gemeinsamen Lernen und Forschen dienen kann, da sie für viele Menschen - egal woher sie kommen, welchen lebensweltlichen oder disziplinären Hintergrund sie mitbringen - leicht zugänglich und nutzbar ist. Auf diesen Zusammenhang beruht der methodologische Rahmen Generative Bildarbeit, den Vera Brandner in ihrer Doktorarbeit konzipiert, empirisch erprobt und konsolidiert hat. Verschiedene Aspekte fotografisch-visueller Methoden werden mit postkolonialer, fotokritischer und emanzipatorischer Theorienbildung verschränkt. Konzeptuelle und praktische Basisarbeit für die Entwicklung Generativer Bildarbeit wurde in der Arbeit des Vereins ipsum1 zwischen 2003 und 2010 in Angola, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Israel, Palästina und Österreich geleistet. Es handelt sich dabei um eine Systematisierung der verschiedenen Blickakte, Interaktions- und Reflexionsformen, die im fotografischen Geflecht möglich sind, um diese für das dialogische Arbeiten mit Menschen verschiedener Erkenntniskulturen nutzbar zu machen. Die Fotografie wird als Praxisform in Situationen eingesetzt, in denen die beteiligten Akteur_innen einander aufgrund ihrer unterschiedlichen Herkunft, Sozialisierung und Spezialisierung fremd sind, durch geteilte Problemstellungen jedoch miteinander in Verbindung stehen. Es geht bei Generativer Bildarbeit um ein Arbeiten an den Grenzen des Eigenen und des Anderen, wobei diese Problemstellungen zugänglich, beforschbar und transformierbar gemacht werden. Die Fotografie wird zum Übungs- und Forschungsfeld für das Umgehen mit Kultureller Differenz. In diesem Übungsfeld entwickeln die Teilnehmer_innen Gestaltungs- und Reflexionsformen, um mit bestehenden Widersprüchen und Unsicherheiten ihrem jeweiligen Kontext entsprechend umzugehen.
Water is an essential natural resource, yet we are experiencing a global water crisis. This crisis is first and foremost a crisis of governance rather than of actual physical resources. Capacities of single, unitary states are severely challenged by the complex, multi-scalar, and dynamic structure of contemporary problems in water resource management. New modes of governance stress the potential of public participation and scalar restructuring for effective and legitimate environmental decision-making. However, a lack evidence on the actual implementation and instrumental value of novel governance modes stands in stark contrast to the strong beliefs and assumptions that often see these being propagated as ´panaceas´ or ´universal remedies´. With this doctoral dissertation I aim to contribute to a deeper understanding of the implementation and performance of public participation and scalar restructuring in environmental governance, and particularly to engage in systematic research into the contextual factors that shape the performance of such governance innovations. Based on the conceptual approaches of participatory, multi-level governance and scale, I advance a conceptual framework specifying mechanisms and important contextual factors describing the potential of participation and rescaling to impact on the efficacy of environmental decision-making. Applying this framework, I employ a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative, quantitative, set-theoretic, and review methods, with the aim of maximising the validity of results. Drawing on the institutional frame of the European Water Framework Directive (WFD), I first assess the extent and conditions under which participation and rescaling are actually implemented in the European water resource management regime. Subsequent analyses examine whether these governance shifts, where implemented, actually lead to environmentally effective and legitimate political decisions, and foster social outcomes. Results indicate that actual changes in governance structures remain modest, whereas previous institutional structures and experiences prove rather durable. Hence, despite recent shifts distributing authority towards alternative actors and scales, the state has persisted in its role as central authority in the European water resource management regime. To the extent that they were implemented, public participation and rescaling were generally positively related with the environmental effectiveness and legitimacy of political outcomes. The analysis provides a context-sensitive understanding, by unravelling the supposedly linear relationship between governance inputs and outputs to develop a more nuanced picture of the governance process rather as a composition of multiple, interdependent causal mechanisms that, depending on their actual configuration, lead to various outcomes. In this way, particularly the tension between legitimacy and effectiveness of political outcomes is disentangled, with both being seen as the result of distinct but interrelated properties of the governance system and its contextual circumstances. The thesis furthermore provides insights of practical and policy relevance, highlighting the need and potential to take a context-sensitive perspective in policy design and decision-making. The framework paper and the Ph.D. thesis thus together enhance academic understanding of environmental governance and its potential contributions to sustainability transitions.
In der Wasser- und Abwasseruntersuchung hat der Summenparameter eine heraus-ragende Bedeutung. Sowohl in der gesetzlichen Überwachung als auch der Bemes-sung von Abwasserbehandlungsanlagen werden Belastungen vielfach über die Zu-sammenfassung von Einzelstoffen in Stoffgruppen ausgedrückt. Stoffgruppen lassen sich mit Hilfe von Summenparametern zuverlässig und im Vergleich zu Einzelstoffen mit geringerem Aufwand bestimmen. Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit werden die Verfahrens-grundlagen der Summenparameter und ihre Verwendung in der Wasser- und Abwas-seruntersuchung erläutert. Ein bedeutender wie auch umstrittener Summenparameter ist der AOX - Adsorbier-bare organisch gebundene Halogene (AOX). Bedeutend ist er deshalb, weil er ein ord-nungs- und abgaberechtlich relevanter Abwasserparameter ist. Umstritten ist er unter anderem, weil er ursprünglich für andere Zwecke als die Abwasseruntersuchung ent-wickelt wurde. Seinerzeit war der AOX ein Überwachungsparameter für Trinkwasser. Als Abwasserparameter dient er zur Erfassung einer im Abwasser unerwünschten Stoffgruppe, der besorgnisauslösende Eigenschaften wie Persistenz, Bioakkumulier-barkeit und Toxizität (PBT-Eigenschaften) zugeschrieben wird. Im zweiten Teil der Ar-beit wurden exemplarisch am Parameter AOX die Zusammenhänge zwischen Stoff-parametern und besorgnisauslösenden Eigenschaften bzw. Wirkungen der ausge-wählten parameterausmachenden Substanzen untersucht. Die Untersuchungsergeb-nisse wurden vor allem in Zusammenhang mit der Ermittlung und Verankerung von Mindestanforderungen für das Einleiten von Abwasser bewertet.