Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Report (76) (remove)
Language
- German (60)
- English (15)
- Multiple languages (1)
Keywords
- Export (7)
- Produktivität (7)
- Exports (6)
- Unternehmen (6)
- Deutschland (5)
- Germany (5)
- productivity (5)
- Lüneburg (4)
- Unternehmer (4)
- micro data (4)
Institute
- Frühere Fachbereiche (67)
- Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM) (2)
- Präsident und Verwaltung (2)
- Recht/Wirtschaftsrecht (2)
- BWL (1)
- VWL (1)
This research report presents a transdisciplinary student research project on developing climate resilience of communities in Marine Protected Areas in the Lesser Antilles. For the second time, the Leuphana University Lüneburg and the Sustainable Marine Financing Programme (SMF) of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) partnered up. The first project on the Caribbean Island Dominica showed that community resilience is a complex concept that is not yet well understood. Building on these findings, this year’s project broadened the scope in addressing the effect of varying local conditions on climate resilience on four different Caribbean islands: Dominica, Grenada, St Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines. For the GIZ, the research project aimed at improving the understanding of the socio-ecological resilience framework for tackling problems of Marine Managed Areas (MMA) and Marine Protected Areas (MPA). Also, it enabled new thoughts on how the GIZ and other development agencies can more effectively assist island states to better cope with the challenges of climate change. The role of the students from the “Global Environmental and Sustainability Sciences” programme of Leuphana University included the design of four transdisciplinary research projects to study the effect of varying local conditions in disaster-prone regions in the Southern Caribbean on climate resilience. The developing island states in the Caribbean are extremely vulnerable to more frequent and intense natural hazards while relying on ecosystem services that are threatened by extreme weather events, in particular Hurricanes. After such adverse events, low economic stability leads to a dependency of the states on international assistance. To decrease the vulnerability to shocks, counteracting measures that encourage learning and adaptation can increase the resilience against extreme weather events and their consequences. Concepts that were considered during the design of the transdisciplinary research projects were the adaptation of systems, diversity and stakeholder participation and resilience-focused management systems. Building on the results from last year in Dominica, the establishment of a four islands design allowed for greater comparison to better understand community approaches to solve a concrete sustainability problem: securing livelihoods while protecting natural and cultural resources. The research methods of a literature review, stakeholder mapping, semi-structured interviews, scenario development and visioning were used in the projects. A comparison of the four TD projects revealed four overarching lessons. First, all countries recognise a need for restoration and conservation projects, i.e., nature-based solutions implemented and managed by the local community in the MPA. Furthermore, all four cases show that the limited participation of local people in the management and organisation of the MPA is a factor constraining community resilience. Third, this TD project highlights the importance to distinguish climate change as an event or as a process. When climate change occurs as a series of disaster events (e.g., hurricanes, floodings, and heatwaves) in combination with s gradual degradation of natural ecosystems (e.g., coral bleaching and ocean warming), people in MPA communities show highly adaptive and restorative behaviour. Finally, this project was an attempt to realize a cross-cultural and virtual transdisciplinary project. The research approach of transdisciplinarity links different academic disciplines and concepts, and non-scientific stakeholders are included to find solutions for societal and related scientific problems. A major learning was that in virtual TD projects particular attention needs to be paid to setting clear boundaries and be explicit about success criteria. Nonetheless, the findings of the projects provide valuable learning lessons to be applied in practice and that can prove useful for future research.
This research report presents a transdisciplinary student research project on the development of climate resilience of communities on the Caribbean Island Dominica.
The research was conducted through a partnership between the Leuphana University Lüneburg and the Sustainable Marine Financing Programme (SMF) of the GIZ.
For the GIZ, the research project aimed at improving the understanding of the socio-ecological resilience framework for tackling problems of Marine Managed Areas and Marine Protected Areas. Also, it enabled new thoughts on how the GIZ and other development agencies can more effectively assists island states to better cope with the challenges of climate change.
The role of the students from the “Global Environmental and Sustainability Sciences” programme of Leuphana University included the design of four transdisciplinary research projects to research aspects of resilience of Caribbean communities.
The developing island states in the Caribbean are extremely vulnerable to more frequent and intense natural hazards while relying on the ecosystem services that are also at risk from extreme weather events, in particular Hurricanes. Low economic stability leads to a dependency of the states on international assistance. To decrease the vulnerability to shocks, counteracting measures that encourage learning and adaptation can increase the resilience against extreme weather events and their consequences.
Concepts that were considered during the design of the transdisciplinary research projects were the adaptation of systems, diversity and stakeholder participation and resilience-focused management systems. Also, the students critically assessed the concept of foreign aid and how it can be successful, mitigating the risk of introducing neo-colonial structures. Flood Management, Biodiversity, Small-Scale Agriculture and Foreign Aid on Dominica were the topics of the transdisciplinary projects. The research methods of a literature review, stakeholder mapping, interviews, scenario development and visioning were used in the projects.
In four scenarios developed in the ‘Flood Management’ project, it became evident that a broad as well as coordinated stakeholder engagement and a variety of measures are required for community resilience. A key finding of the ‘Biodiversity’ project was the identity dimension of community resilience, underlining the importance of the relationship between individuals and nature. The interlinkage of social identity processes and a resilient disaster response was also stressed by the project ‘Foreign Aid’, which highlighted that financial support is similarly important to inclusivity and reflexivity in the process of resource distribution. To recover from extreme weather events, the social memory also plays an important role. The project on ‘Small-scale Agriculture’ concluded, that the memory-making of local communities is as vital to community resilience as formal plans and trainings.
The research project was based on the research approach of transdisciplinarity because of its solution-orientation. It links different academic disciplines and concepts, and non-scientific stakeholders are included to find solutions for societal and related scientific problems. In the four projects, principles of transdisciplinary research were party applied, but some challenges arose due to the geographical distance, time constraints and a strong focus on the scientific part in some phases. Nonetheless, the findings of the projects provide valuable learning lessons to be applied in practice and that can prove useful for future research.
pdf 1: Architekturführer und Interviews mit pdf 2: Kurt Hölzer pdf 3: Carl-Peter von Mansberg pdf 4: Daniel Libeskind pdf 5: Oliver Opel pdf 6: Robert Ketterer pdf 7: Ulrich Tränkmann
Dieser Projektbericht wurde im Wintersemester 07/08 von einem dreizehnköpfigen Team, bestehend aus Studierenden des Departments Wirtschaftsrecht der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, unter Leitung von Prof. Dr. Zenz, erstellt. In der übertragenen Aufgabe galt es, den Weg der Normen des Genossenschaftsgesetzes von der alten Fassung hin zur Novellierung zu rekapitulieren. Ausgehend vom alten Gesetzestext ist somit für die maßgeblichen Bestimmungen aufgezeigt, welche Änderungen das vom Bundesministerium der Justiz gebildete Referat im Gesetzesentwurf und in der dazugehörigen Begründung vom 19.10.2005 verfasste. Aufbauend auf dieser „Rohfassung“ erfolgt sodann ein Abgleich mit der hierzu erfolgten Stellungnahme des BVR, also des Bundesverbandes der Deutschen Volksbanken und Raiffeisenbanken vom 27.10.2005 und der Stellungnahme des Bundesrates vom 10.03.2006 hin zum verabschiedeten Text, wie er sich heute in dem geltenden Genossenschaftsgesetz wieder findet.
Aktuell weisen Sparkassen im Geschäft mit Firmenkunden in der Regel eine gute bis sehr gute Marktposition und eine solide Ertragslage auf. Vordergründig gibt es damit scheinbar wenig Anlass, am Marktauftritt und an den etablierten Organisationsstrukturen des Firmenkundengeschäfts in Sparkassen etwas zu ändern. Damit die Wettbewerbsposition in Anbetracht der absehbaren Marktveränderungen langfristig gefestigt werden kann, sind gleichwohl rechtzeitig Maßnahmen zu ergreifen, mit denen eine vertriebsorientierte Ausrichtung des Firmenkundengeschäfts erreicht wird. Dessen Merkmale und Bestandteile werden im Folgenden vorgestellt, wobei als Ausgangspunkte eine Analyse des Status Quo und der marktlichen Herausforderungen dienen.
Forschungsbericht 2007
(2008)
Das Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg legt hiermit seinen zweiten eigenständigen Forschungsbericht vor. Seit 1999 erschien unser Bericht als Teil des Forschungsberichts des Fachbereichs Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften; dieser Bericht wurde nach dem Berichtsjahr 2005 eingestellt, da der Fachbereich seit 2006 Teil der neuen Fakultät II ist. Für die Fakultät II ist bisher kein solcher ausführlich informierender Forschungsbericht vorgesehen. Wir möchten mit unserem Bericht alle Interessenten an unserer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit in kompakter Form über die von uns bearbeiteten Forschungsthemen und die dabei erarbeiteten Publikationen sowie unsere weiteren Leistungen unterrichten. Viele Ergebnisse finden sich – zumeist in vorläufiger Form und als Pre-Print-Fassung vor der eigentlichen Publikation – in unserer seit 2005 erscheinenden Reihe University of Lüneburg Working Paper Series in Economics (download unter www.leuphana.de/vwl/papers); Informationen hierzu finden Sie am Ende dieses Berichts.
In this paper, we conduct a pan-European efficiency analysis to investigate the performance of European railways with a particular focus on economies of vertical integration. We test the hypothesis that integrated railways realize economies of scope and, thus, produce railway services with a higher level of efficiency. To determine whether joint or separate production is more efficient, we apply a Data Envelopment Analysis super-efficiency bootstrapping model which relates the efficiency for integrated production to a reference set consisting of separated firms which use a different production technology. We find that for a majority of European railways economies of scope exist.
Der vorliegende Forschungsbericht und Bericht über Auslandsbeziehungen 2006 der Fakultät II für Wirtschafts-, Verhaltens- und Rechtwissenschaften ist der erste Forschungsbericht nach Fusion der ehemaligen Universität Lüneburg und der ehemaligen Fachhochschule Nordostniedersachsen. In der neuen Fakultät II wurden der ehemalige Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften (ohne Sozialwissenschaften) der Universität und die ehemaligen Fachbereiche Wirtschaft, Wirtschaftsrecht und Wirtschaftspsychologie der Fachhochschule zusammengefasst.
