Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Research Paper (143)
- Diplomarbeit (58)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (40)
- Dissertation (37)
- Bericht (30)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (19)
- Beitrag in Konferenzband (13)
- Buch (Monographie) (9)
- Sonstiges (7)
- Zeitschrifteneinzelheft (3)
Schlagworte
- Informatik (18)
- Kultur (15)
- Schule (12)
- Deutschland (10)
- Export (10)
- Produktivität (9)
- Unternehmen (9)
- Computer (7)
- Exports (7)
- Germany (7)
Institut
- Frühere Fachbereiche (363) (entfernen)
Many public goods are characterized by rivalry and/or excludability. This paper introduces both non-excludable and excludable public inputs into a simple endogenous growth model. We derive the equilibrium growth rate and design the optimal tax and user-cost structure. Our results emphasize the role of congestion in determining this optimal financing structure and the consequences this has in turn for the government’s budget. The latter consists of fee and tax revenues that are used to finance the entire public production input and that may or may not suffice to finance the entire public input, depending upon the degree of congestion. We extend the model to allow for monopoly pricing of the user fee by the government. Most of the analysis is conducted for general production functions consistent with endogenous growth, although the case of CES technology is also considered.
This paper analyzes the growth impact of fiscal and institutional governmental policies in a regional context. The government provides a productive input that is complementary to private capital. Institutional policies include the decision about the type of public input as well as on the size of the region as determined by the number of firms. Fiscal policies decide on the extent of the public input. Private capital accumulation incurs adjustment costs that depend upon the ratio between private and public investment. After deriving the decentralized equilibrium, fiscal and institutional policies as well as their interdependencies and welfare implications are discussed. Due to the feedback effects both policies may not be determined independently. It is also shown that depending on the region’s size different types of the public input maximize growth.
Tätigkeitsbericht WS 2004/2005 - SS 2006 des Lehrstuhls für Produktion und Wirtschaftsinformatik
Datenmodelle sind ein zentraler Bestandteil betrieblicher Informationssysteme. In der Praxis eingesetzte Datenmodelle erreichen oft eine erhebliche Komplexität. Eine Möglichkeit zur Reduktion der Komplexität besteht darin, gleiche oder ähnliche Teilstrukturen zu identifizieren. Durch Ausnutzung solcher Strukturanalogien kann dann das Datenmodell vereinheitlicht und vereinfacht werden. Ziel dieses Aufsatzes ist es, die bestehenden Ansätze zur Definition, Identifikation und Ausnutzung von Strukturanalogien in Datenmodellen weiterzuentwickeln.
Der vorliegende Forschungsbericht und Bericht über Auslandsbeziehungen 2006 der Fakultät II für Wirtschafts-, Verhaltens- und Rechtwissenschaften ist der erste Forschungsbericht nach Fusion der ehemaligen Universität Lüneburg und der ehemaligen Fachhochschule Nordostniedersachsen. In der neuen Fakultät II wurden der ehemalige Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften (ohne Sozialwissenschaften) der Universität und die ehemaligen Fachbereiche Wirtschaft, Wirtschaftsrecht und Wirtschaftspsychologie der Fachhochschule zusammengefasst.
This paper analyzes, within a regional growth model, the impact of productive governmental policy and integration on the spatial distribution of economic activity. Integration is understood as enhancing territorial cooperation between the regions, and it describes the extent to which one region may benefit from the other region’s public input, e.g. the extent to which regional road networks are connected. Both integration and the characteristics of the public input crucially affect whether agglomeration arises and if so to which extent economic activity is concentrated: As a consequence of enhanced integration, agglomeration is less likely to arise and concentration will be lower. Relative congestion reinforces agglomeration, thereby increasing equilibrium concentration. Due to the congestion externalities, the market outcome ends up in suboptimally high concentration.
Recent discussions about the evolvement of nanotechnologies criticize that the notion ‘risk’ is too abstract and an all-inclusive category. Moreover, the concept of risk is not precise enough to describe the potential issues related to the development of nanotechnologies. Instead, experts of technological development speak more about risk communication. Within the field of nanotechnologies, they even redefined this expression in February 2005 and related it to the question of the societal acceptance of nanotechnologies. Risk communication is about to gain stakeholder acceptance of policy decisions, whereas public and stakeholders are encouraged to participate actively in the communication process through public consultations, hearings, etc. Thus on the one hand, the category of risk has been pragmatically nuanced in order to better highlight the vulnerability of the communication on nanotechnologies. On the other hand, this vulnerable communication is not the result of a deficit of information. It is based on the idea of participation, where the vulnerability relies on the social groups specialized in the design, the application, and the diffusion of nanotechnologies within society. How is this participation possible, and what does it mean? We develop this question in the framework of a comparative survey on experts that are involved in the deployment of nanotechnologies in Grenoble (France) and Hamburg (Germany).