Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Dissertation (498)
- Research Paper (235)
- Bachelorarbeit (93)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (87)
- Diplomarbeit (65)
- Masterarbeit (64)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (55)
- Buch (Monographie) (49)
- Bericht (38)
- Beitrag in Konferenzband (32)
Schlagworte
- Nachhaltigkeit (53)
- Informatik (19)
- Biodiversität (16)
- Deutschland (16)
- Kultur (16)
- Personalpolitik (15)
- Schule (15)
- Export (14)
- Lehrkräfte (14)
- Management (14)
Institut
- Frühere Fachbereiche (363)
- Fakultät Nachhaltigkeit (165)
- Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften (114)
- Fakultät Bildung (85)
- BWL (64)
- Fakultät Kulturwissenschaften (58)
- Psychologie/Wirtschaftspsychologie (49)
- Institut für Nachhaltigkeitssteuerung (INSUGO) (31)
- Institut für Ökologie (IE) (31)
- Nachhaltigkeitsmgmt./-ökologie (27)
This paper uses data from the German Socio-Economic Panel for the years 2000 to 2005 to study the earnings differential between self- and dependent employed German men. Constructing a counterfactual earnings distribution for the self-employed in dependent employment and using quantile regression decompositions we find that the earnings differential over the distribution cannot be explained by differences in endowments. Furthermore, low-earning self-employed could earn more in dependent employment. Finally, the observed earnings advantage for the self-employed at the top of the earnings distribution is not associated with higher returns to observable variables.
Economic theory suggests both positive and negative relationships between intra-firm wage inequality and productivity. This paper contributes to the growing empirical literature on this subject. We combine German employer-employee-data for the years 1995-2005 with inequality measures using the whole wage distribution of a firm and rely on dynamic panel-data estimators to control for unobserved heterogeneity, simultaneity problems and possible state dependence. Our results indicate a relative minor influence of intra-firm wage inequality on firm productivity. If anything, they provide some support for a view suggesting that some inequality may be beneficial, while too much leads to a detrimental effect on productivity.