Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2014 (24) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
- Dissertation (24) (entfernen)
Sprache
- Englisch (16)
- Deutsch (7)
- Mehrsprachig (1)
Schlagworte
- Biodiversität (2)
- Nachhaltigkeit (2)
- biodiversity (2)
- sustainability (2)
- Activated Sludge (1)
- Arbeitslosigkeit (1)
- Arbeitsmarkt (1)
- Bondholder Relations (1)
- Consumer Protection (1)
- Corporate Bond (1)
Institut
- BWL (6)
- Nachhaltigkeitsmgmt./-ökologie (5)
- Chemie (2)
- VWL (2)
- Institut für Politikwissenschaft (IPW) (1)
- Institut für Ökologie (IE) (1)
- Kulturwissenschaften (1)
- Kulturwissenschaften (alt) (1)
- Politikwissenschaften (1)
- Psychologie (1)
Human activities have converted natural ecosystems worldwide, mostly for agricultural purposes. This change in land use has been recognized as one of the key drivers causing mass extinction of biodiversity. Yet, there are species which persist particularly in traditional, low-intensity agricultural areas. However, this farmland biodiversity is increasingly threatened by the consequences of land-use intensification and land abandonment. One effect of these two processes is the change in existing landscape structures. This dissertation aimed at quantifying the relationship between biodiversity and landscape structures because a better understanding of current biodiversity patterns and their drivers is needed to navigate biodiversity conservation for a sustainable development. Specifically, this dissertation anticipates the impacts of land-use change on biodiversity in Southern Transylvania, focusing on butterflies and plants as study groups. In a first step, a methodological baseline for subsequent biodiversity studies is developed by exploring an optimal survey strategy, allocating the available resources in a study design that enables high statistical power and covers a wide range of environmental conditions. This study shows that in the highly heterogeneous farmland mosaic of Southern Transylvania, survey effort can be moderately reduced while still showing similar patterns of species richness, species turnover and species composition (Chapter 2). In a second step, biodiversity patterns of plants and butterflies are empirically investigated in response to different landscape structures, particularly towards heterogeneity and woody vegetation cover. These studies provide evidence that all main land-use types in Southern Transylvania, namely arable land, grassland and forests, contribute to an overall landscape pool. Species richness of plants, but not of butterflies, differed significantly between arable land and grassland. Presence of woody vegetation in farmland had a positive effect on plant species richness. Heterogeneity has been found beneficial for butterfly species richness in arable land, but not in grasslands. Species composition of plants was determined by land-use, but butterfly species composition was widely overlapping in arable land and grassland (Chapters 3 & 4). Investigations on the potential spread of invasive plant species in the Transylvanian landscape exhibited that distance to roads and heterogeneity, especially in arable land, were key variables determining the invasibility of the landscape (Chapter 5). By studying movement patterns of butterflies in agricultural landscapes, land-use intensity could be revealed having an impact on butterfly movements. Furthermore, butterflies were found to prefer non-arable patches within farmland (Chapter 6). In a third step, this dissertation conceptually embeds socio-economic considerations into the local and international discourse on sustainable rural development: Reflections on a participatory projects on establishing butterfly monitoring in Romania conclude that involving citizens in biodiversity conservation is possible in Romania, but need tailored approaches which consider the unique social and cultural settings (Chapter 7). Current recommendations from scientific literature to increase the agricultural yield, for example in Eastern European landscapes, through ´sustainable intensification´ for global food security are scrutinized for their engagement with sustainability. This dissertation concludes that genuine sustainable solutions need to respect the various aspects of sustainability, including procedural and distributive justice. Furthermore, it is clarified that general recommendations for agricultural intensification, for instance in Romania, may lead to devastating impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem functions (Chapter 8). This dissertation provides evidence that the beneficial characteristics of the Translvanian farmland are linked to the fine spatial scale of the agricultural mosaic, the amount and distribution of semi-natural elements and the scattered woody vegetation throughout the landscape. Hence, the future of biodiversity depends on human interventions in the ancient cultural landscape. Navigating biodiversity conservation in Southern Transylvania thus needs genuine sustainable solutions, which integrate socially acceptable and ecological meaningful landscape management.
The concept of corporate entrepreneurship continues to occupy the minds of scholars and practitioners alike. This is not surprising as corporate entrepreneurship constitutes a major driver of organizational revitalization, learning, and growth within large and medium size organizations. However, despite extensive research on corporate entrepreneurship, there is still confusion about the interplay of its macro- and micro-level constituents. To unveil how the structures, practices, and behaviors, which constitute entrepreneurship in large, diversified firms, interact, I utilize a systemic reasoning and link the notion of corporate entrepreneurship to diverse theoretical positions in the strategic management field including intraorganizational ecology, institutional theory, and configuration theory - links that have been so far neglected in the literature on corporate entrepreneurship. I develop my arguments in three complementary articles. In the first article, I provide a review of the theoretical framework that to a large extent underpins my research: the Bower-Burgelman process model. In the second article, I take a qualitative case study approach to analyze how micro-level practices affect the intraorganizational and external environment in favor of an entrepreneurial initiative. In the third article, I identify four different design types on the basis of a qualitative meta-synthesis, which reflect coherent constellations of managerial interpretive-schemes, structures, and systems that cultivate entrepreneurial behavior. In sum, this dissertation contributes to a new understanding of corporate entrepreneurship as a system of entrepreneurially behaving actors who are constrained and simultaneously enabled by a set of social, cultural, political, and structural context factors.
Die Diskussionen in der bildungspolitischen Auseinandersetzung um die Qualifikationen der staatlich anerkannten Erzieher*innen werden kontrovers geführt. Veränderungen in globalisierten Zusammenhängen und der daraufhin entwickelte Deutsche Qualifikationsrahmen (DQR) (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, 2013) führen dazu, dass auf Deutschlands bildungspolitischer Ebene eine neue Lernkultur diskutiert wird, die auf kontinuierliche (Lern-) Prozesse von frühkindlicher Bildung bis zur Aus- und Weiterbildung ausgerichtet ist. Durch die Einstufung der Erzieher*innen-Ausbildung in den DQR auf Niveaustufe 6 ist die Ausbildung mit einem hochschulischen Bachelor als gleichwertig anzusehen. Diese Entwicklungen zeigen, dass Bewegungen in den Professionalisierungsbestrebungen der Erzieher*innen-Ausbildung bestehen. Die hier vorliegende Studie widmet sich der bisher bestehenden Forschungslücke, das Subjekt und das aktive, forschende Lernen in die bisher eher strukturell geführten Diskussionen zu integrieren, um die geforderte professionelle Haltung (vgl. Kompetenzorientiertes Qualifikationsprofil, 2012) entwickelbar zu machen. Im Fokus dieser Arbeit steht das Erkenntnisinteresse, welche Möglichkeiten ein internationales Praktikum für die (Weiter-)Entwicklung eines beruflichen Habitus im Sinne von „Wissen, Können und Tun“ (Karsten 2008: 17) von Schüler*innen in der Ausbildung zur staatlich anerkannten Erzieher*in eröffnet. Sie zeigt die komplexen, nie abgeschlossenen und immer strittigen Prozesse auf, in denen die Schüler*innen sich in der Ausbildung bewegen und welche Erkenntnisse und Möglichkeiten die Schüler*innen für sich entdecken und mit ihrem professionellen Verständnis verknüpfen, um ihren beruflichen Habitus (weiter-) zu entwickeln.
Corruption as “the abuse of entrusted power for private gain” (Transparency International, 2013) is detrimental to economic, social and political development. It intensively violates the fundamental principles of democracy such as equality, fairness, transparency and accountability (Sandholtz and Taagepera, 2005). Europe exhibits a wide spectrum of corrupt activities and is characterized by large differences as to the extent and dynamics of corruption. Thus, it is astonishing that there is still little knowledge about the region-specific factors that determine corruption. Considering corruption as a multilevel phenomenon that takes place at the country level and is often measured by certain aggregated indices, this project examines corruption also at the individual level with data from the World Values Survey. The study includes 37 European countries at the macro level and 20 countries at the micro level (1995-2010). For comparative purposes and in order to uncover specific European determinants of corruption, all statistical calculations are run with an additional sample (“non-European country sample”), including countries world-wide. The results of the panel and multilevel analysis indicate that a country’s rate of inflation, international integration, the degree and duration of democracy, anti-corruption policy, the percentage of women in parliaments, religion, society’s history of corruption strongly influence the extent and dynamics of corruption at the country-level. At the individual level, an individual’s employment status, satisfaction with the financial situation, emancipative values, interpersonal trust and the justification of bribery are significant causes of corruption across and within European countries. A comparison of these results with the findings of the “world sample” clearly demonstrates that there are regional differences.
During recent decades, the arenas of political decision-making have increasingly shifted from national governments to intergovernmental and transnational political forums. At the same time, the number and relevance of non-state actors in international politics is steadily growing. These trends have led political scientists to study and theorize about new forms of democracy beyond the national political arenas (Archibugi 2004, Bexell et al. 2010, Nasström 2010). However, democracy beyond the nation state is difficult to conceptualize with the idea of an institutionalized democracy within the borders of nation-states. Instead, many political scientists emphasize the role of civil society actors as a cure for the democratic deficit in inter-national politics (Steffek & Nanz 2008). Yet, normative and empirical problems arise over the extent of access, selection and role of civil society actors in international organizations (Tallberg et al. 2013). Furthermore, the normative relevance of transnational civil society actors makes it necessary to study their own democratic legitimacy. While international organizations are mostly institutionalized and hierarchical governing bodies, the ever growing diffuse conglomerate of non-state actors is characterized by fluid structures, blurry boundaries and a multi-level setting of interaction (Keck & Sikkink 1998). Thus, in studying democratic practice in transnational civil society networks, we must ask: How institutionalized do political practices have to be and how flexible can they be, to still be considered democratic? Normative theorists reconceptualized democracy in the light of this changing context (Bohman 2007). Recent concepts of participatory, deliberative and representative democracy attempt to reconfigure existing democratic institutions through procedural elements (Fung & Wright 2003, Dryzek 2006) or innovative forms of representation (Phillips 1998, Mansbridge 2003, Castiglione & Warren 2006). This emerging theoretical framework is well suited to analyze the extent, to which democratic practices exist within transnational civil society networks. By applying the concept of practice (Giddens 1984, Schatzki et al. 2005) as a bridging tool between the empirical reality of fluid, temporary and open transnational civil society networks on the one hand and the institution-oriented democratic theory on the other hand, this study explores the extent to which democratic practice develops in a field that lacks traditional institutions to guarantee citizen participation. As innovative transnational actors, civil society networks can bring up new forms of democratic practice (see Polletta 2006) that can potentially inspire the debate about transnational democracy as such. This study, with its innovate approach, hopes to invigorate the debate about transnational democracy and transnational civil society, which has stalled to some degree in recent years. The study is divided into three parts; first, a conceptual part that clarifies the question of how democracy as practice can be theoretically conceptualized in transnational civil society net-works, which is followed by an empirical exploration of political practices in the transnational civil society networks. In this second part, the main question is how participation, representation and deliberation practice develops in transnational civil society networks. Two cases of transnational civil society networks, the Clean Clothes Campaign and Friends of the Earth, are analyzed to provide insights into the democratic practice within transnational civil society. In the final part, the empirical findings are evaluated in the light of the outlined concepts of democratic theory in order to explore how democratic these political practices actually are. The study identifies implicit and in-process practices of democratic norms in transnational civil society networks. Political practice in transnational civil society networks can become demo-cratic through empowerment measures and trustful relationships. However, deliberate demo-cratic practice can be impeded by disembodied digital communication and complex decision-making. The study explores how new forms of democratic practice emerge in the interaction between political actors and the structural environments of actors and networks.
This dissertation offers three different perspectives on agency and institutional change. Within three different articles these perspectives are presented and discussed. In the following these three articles are introduced: Article I: Competing concepts of power in institutional theory make the analysis of institutional change challenging. On the one hand, the assumption of powerful institutions leaves little space for agency and institutional change; while on the other hand, the assumption of powerful actors allows for agency but contradicts the fundamental assumption of institutional theory as stated before. This article wishes to propose a concept of power that is consistent with institutional theory and preserves core institutionalist assumptions, but still offers an explanation for agency and institutional change. Article II: This study examines a case of embedded agency from the German accounting industry, which existing approaches of the paradox of embedded agency cannot explain. Based on an instrumental case study, this paper will provide a new explanation of embedded agency by highlighting the interaction between the different actors of an organizational field. Article III: Based on a dialectical perspective on institutional change, this paper studies the transformation of the German accounting industry covering the time period from 2000 to 2012. Corresponding to Seo and Creed (2002), this article identifies “intrainstitutional conformity that creates interinstitutional incompatibilities”, “legitimacy that undermines functional efficiency”, and “isomorphism that conflicts with divergent interests” (Seo & Creed, 2002, p. 226) as the drivers for recent change in this organizational field. The study provides an explanation of endogenous change that does not rely on institutional agency in explaining institutional change.
The German market for corporate bonds has experienced an unprecedented growth over the last decade. As a growing number of German firms have seized the opportunity to issue debt securities to the market, the need arises to evaluate their attempts to provide bondholders with private corporate information. This doctoral thesis centers on a research interest concerning the extent and effectiveness of corporate disclosure directed at the German bond market. It delivers unprecedented insights into bondholder relations practices and is thought to establish this topic as a research field that is complementary to previous work on shareholder-related disclosure. Taking information asymmetries between firms and bondholders as a basis, the empirical analyses are based on various arguments from the voluntary disclosure theory as well as from principal-agency and related frameworks. In essence, most parts of the thesis follow the key assumption that bondholders demand higher premiums for opaqueness and potentially detrimental behavior on behalf of a bond issuer’s management. The analyses deliver new insights into the role of corporate disclosure and close a gap between bondholder relations and financial as well as shareholder-related disclosure. They contribute to the stream of research that is concerned with corporate disclosure and its relationship to the cost of capital, the cost of debt, and even more specifically the yield (spread) of corporate bonds.
In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden zwei etablierte soziale Dilemmata (Beitragsund Verteilungsdilemma) auf das Feld der Verhandlungsforschung übertragen. Die Parteien mussten entweder über die Verteilung von geteilten Ressourcen oder über den Beitrag zu geteilten Ressourcen in einem integrativen Verhandlungssetting verhandeln. Zusätzlich wurde die Valenz der verhandelten Ressourcen variiert (positive vs. negative Ressourcen). In insgesamt vier Studien wurde demonstriert, dass die Kombination aus Allokationskontext (Beitrag vs. Verteilung) und Ressourcenvalenz (Profite vs. Lasten) zu distinkten regulatorischen Foki führt, welche wiederum die Qualität der Verhandlungsergebnisse beeinflussen. Darüberhinaus wird der Einfluss der regulatorischen Passung in Verhandlungen um Gegenstände mit unterschiedlichen Ergebnisstrukturen gezeigt, sowie die Relevanz der vorliegenden Forschung für die Forschungsfelder der Allmende-, und Sozialen- Dilemma-Forschung diskutiert.
Emotionen sind im Straßenverkehr überproportional vertreten und können negative Auswirkungen auf die Verkehrssicherheit haben. Die am häufigsten untersuchte Emotion in diesem Zusammenhang ist Ärger. Dieser führt zur Einengung der Aufmerksamkeit sowie einer optimistischeren Risikoeinschätzung. Zudem fallen ärgerliche Fahrer durch erhöhte Geschwindigkeiten auf - einer der Hauptursachen von Unfällen. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war es, herauszufinden, durch welche kognitiven Bewertungsdimensionen im Sinne der Appraisaltheorie nach Lazarus (1993) Ärger im Straßenverkehr bestimmt wird. Der Fragestellung wurde sich in drei empirischen Schritten genähert. Zu Beginn wurde eine Onlinebefragung mit dem Ziel durchgeführt, einen allgemeinen Überblick darüber zu geben, welche Emotionen im Straßenverkehr auftreten und welche Rolle Ärger dabei spielt. Als Erfassungsmethode des Emotionsspektrums im Straßenverkehr wurde eine Onlinevariante der Vignettenstudie gewählt. Den Probanden wurden zwölf Textvignetten - Verkehrsszenarien in Textform - vorgelegt, in die sie sich hinein versetzen und angeben sollten, welche Emotionen sie dabei empfanden. Die Verkehrssituationen wurden anhand von vier Appraisaldimensionen (Verantwortlichkeit, Zielrelevanz, Zielkongruenz und Vorsatz) erstellt, um den Verkehrsraum in seiner Breite abzubilden. Es konnte bestätigt werden, dass Ärger sowohl die häufigste als auch stärkste Emotion war. Nachdem die Wichtigkeit der Emotion bestätigt werden konnte, wurde in einem zweiten Schritt untersucht, welche weiteren Bewertungskomponenten im Sinne der Appraisaltheorie bei der Entstehung von Ärger im Straßenverkehr eine Rolle spielen. Dafür wurde als Methode eine Simulatorstudie mit anschließendem, qualitativem Interview gewählt. Das vordergründige Ziel war es, die aus der Literatur bekannten Dimensionen auf ihre Relevanz im Kontext Straßenverkehr zu überprüfen und zu erweitern. Neben der Bestätigung der Dimension Zielrelevanz ergaben sich bei den Interviews zwei weitere Bewertungsdimensionen: die wahrgenommene Kontrolle sowie der Grad des Verständnisses für die Blockierung. Sobald eine Person sich den Grund für eine Blockierung vorstellen konnte war der Ärger weniger intensiv. Die Studie zeigte vor allem, dass die objektiven Kriterien einer Situation (z.B. keine Kontrolle gegeben) nicht zwangsläufig die individuellen Bewertungen dieser widerspiegelten, woraus die These eines multiplen Mediatormodells entwickelt und in einer dritten Studie quantitativ getestet wurde. Die Dimensionen Verständnis und Kontrolle wurden daher in objektive Situationsmerkmale und individuelle Bewertungen unterteilt. Das Mediatormodell konnte insgesamt bestätigt werden. Dabei wurde der Ärger (AV) hauptsächlich durch die individuellen Bewertungen (Mediatoren) bestimmt. Der Effekt der externen Manipulation (UV) der Dimensionen Verständnis und Kontrolle wurde fast vollständig über deren individuelle Abbildung vermittelt. Die objektiven Gegebenheiten einer Situation (z.B. Begründung für Verhalten) können zwar die Bewertung beeinflussen, jedoch nicht die Stärke der Emotion direkt vorhersagen. Besonders die Dimension Verständnis zeigte großen Einfluss auf die Intensität - je höher der Grad des Verständnisses, umso geringer der Ärger. Somit beeinflusst das Geben einer Begründung für eine Blockierung im Straßenverkehr das individuelle Verständnis und minimiert den Ärger signifikant. Daraus ergeben sich direkte Anwendungsmöglichkeiten, um Ärger im Straßenverkehr abzuschwächen und das Risiko eines Unfalls zu minimieren.