Assessment of forest functionality and the effectiveness of forest management and certification
(2021)
Forest ecosystems are complex systems that develop inherent structures and processes relevant for their functioning and the provisioning of ecosystem services that contribute to human wellbeing. So far, forest management focused on timber production while other services were less rewarded. With increasing climate change impacts, especially regulating ecosystem services such as microclimate regulation are ever more relevant to maintain forest functions and services. A key question is how forest management supports or undermines the ecosystems’ capacity to maintain those functions and services. Forest management implies silvicultural interventions such as thinning and timber harvesting and ranges from single tree extraction to large clearcuts as well as forest reserves without active forest operations and shape the character of forest ecosystems (e.g. natural versus planted forests). Artificial plantings, monocultures and management for economic timber production simplify forest structures and impair ecosystem resilience, resistance and the existence of forests but also the services essential for the prosperity and health of humanity. Efforts to reduce the negative impacts and attempts to safeguard forest functions are manifold and include compulsory national and international guidelines and regulations for forest management, conventions, but also voluntary mechanisms such as certification systems.
The main objective of this thesis was the development of a concept to assess the functionality of forests and to evaluate the effectiveness of forest ecosystem management including certification. An ecosystem-based and participatory methodology, named ECOSEFFECT, was developed. The method comprises a theoretical and an empirical plausibility analysis. It was applied to the Russian National FSC Standard in the Arkhangelsk Region of the Russian Federation – where boreal forests are exploited to meet Europe's demand for timber. In addition, the influence of forestry interventions on temperature regulation in Scots pine and European beech forests in Germany was assessed during two extreme hot and dry years in 2018 and 2019.
Microclimate regulation is a suitable proxy for forest functionality and can be applied easily to evaluate the effectiveness of forest management in safeguarding regulating forest functions relevant under climate change. Microclimate represents the most decisive factor differentiating clearcuts and primary forests. Thus, the assessment of forest microclimate regulation serves as convenient tool to illustrate forest functionality. In the boreal and temperate forests studied in the frame of this thesis, timber harvesting reduced the capacity to self-regulate forests’ microclimate and thus impair a crucial part of ecosystem functionality. Changes in structural forest characteristics influenced by forest management and silviculture significantly affect microclimatic conditions and therefore forest ecosystems’ vulnerability to climate change. Canopy coverage and the number of cut trees were most relevant for cooling maximum summer temperature in pine and beech forests in northern Germany. Maximum temperature measured at ground level increased by 0.21 – 0.34 K when 100 trees were cut. Opening the forest canopy by 10 % caused an increase of maximum temperature at ground-level by 0.53 K (including pine and beech stands). Relative temperature cooling capacity decreased with increasing wood harvest activities and dropped below average values when more than 656 trees per hectare (in 2018; and 867 trees in 2019) were felled. In pine stands with a canopy cover below 82 % the relative temperature buffering capacity was lower than the average. Mean maximum temperature measured at ground-level and in 1.3 m was highest in a pine-dominated sample plots with relatively low stand volume (177 m3 ha-1) and 9 K lower in a sample plot with relatively high stock volumes of F. sylvatica (> 565 m3 ha-1). During the hottest day in 2019, the difference in temperature peaks was more than 13 K for pine-dominated sample plots with relatively dense (72 %) and low (46 %) canopy cover.
The Russian FSC standard has the potential to improve forest management and ecological outcomes, but there are shortcomings in the precision of targeting actual problems and ecological commitment. In theory, FSC would transform forest management practices and induce positive changes and effective outcomes by addressing 75 % of the identified contributing factors including highly relevant factors and threats including large-scale (temporary) tree cover loss, which contributes to reducing about half of the identified stresses in the ecosystem. It is theoretically plausible that FSC prevents logging in high conservation value forests and intact forest landscapes, reduces the size and number of clearcuts, and prevents hydrological changes in the landscape. However, the standard was not sufficiently explicit and compulsory to generate a strong and positive influence on the identified problems and their drivers. Moreover, spatial data revealed, that the typical regular clearcut patterns of conventional timber harvesting continue to progress into the FSC-certified boreal forests, also if declared as ‘Intact Forest Landscape’. This results in the need to verify the assumptions and postulates on the ground as it remains unclear and questionable if functions and services of boreal forests are maintained when FSC-certified clearcutting continues. On the clearcuts, maximum temperature exceeded 36 °C and stayed below 30 °C in the closed primary forest. The number of days with temperatures above 25 °C at least doubled on clearcuts. Temperature cooling capacity was reduced by up to 14 % and temperature buffering capacity up to 60 %. The main reason why FSC-certified clearcuts do not differ from conventional clearcuts is that about 97 % of trees within equally large clearcut sites of up to 50 ha were removed. The spatial design of clearcuts, their size and the intensity of clearing as well as the density of skidding trails for timber extraction was not positively influenced by FSC-certification. Annual tree cover loss was lowest in non-certified areas. This means, that FSC may even contribute to an increased biomass removal within the clearcuts, which compromises the ecosystems’ capacity to recover and maintain ecological functions and services. The analysis of satellite-based data on tree cover loss showed that clearcutting causes secondary dieback in the surrounding of the cleared area. FSC-certification does not prevent the various negative impacts of clearcutting and thus fails to safeguard ecosystem functions. The postulated success in reducing identified environmental threats and stresses, e. g. through a smaller size of clearcuts, could not be verified on site. The empirical assessment does not support the hypothesis of effective improvements in the ecosystem. In practice, FSC-certification did not contribute to change clearcutting practices sufficiently to effectively improve the ecological performance. Sustainability standards that are unable to translate principles into effective outcomes fail in meeting the intended objectives of safeguarding ecosystem functioning. Clearcuts that carry sustainability labels are ecologically problematic and ineffective for the intended purpose of ecological sustainability.
The overexploitation of provisioning services, i.e. timber extraction, diminishes the ecosystems’ capacity to maintain other services of global significance. It also impairs ecosystem functions relevant to cope with and adapt to other stresses and disturbances that are rapidly increasing under climate change.
Forest management under climate change needs to apply precautionary principles and reduce further ecological risks such as secondary dieback and deterioration of regulating services that are relevant for the functioning of forests. Forest managers have to avoid ecological disimprovements by applying strict ecological principles with effective outcomes in order to maintain functional forests that regulate their own microclimate also as a basis for sustainable economic benefits.
Forest ecosystems significantly contribute to global carbon (C) sequestration and therefore play a crucial role for climate change mitigation. At the same time, forests were and are subjected to past and current environmental changes with consequences for the functioning of forest ecosystems and their associated ecosystem services. Forests in Central Europe are highly influenced by former settlement activities and land-use changes, as well as silvicultural management measures. Until the beginning of the 19th century anthropogenic activities caused a tremendous decline of the forest area. The resulting timber shortage led to large scale afforestations on previously agriculturally used land (e.g. heathlands, grasslands and croplands) during the 19th and 20th century. Widespread afforestation programs created recent forest ecosystems (i.e. young forest systems in terms of their development history). Despite the positive effect of increasing the forest area of Central Europe, the ecological effects of these land-use changes on forest ecosystems remain poorly understood. In addition, most forests in Central Europe are under silvicultural management, while the knowledge about the consequences of management measures on forest ecosystem functioning, particularly in the face of ongoing global environmental changes, is also still limited. In order to increase the understanding of ecosystem processes in forests, an assessment of conceivable shifts in ecosystem functions caused by former land-use changes and forest management is required. By analysing aboveground growth rates of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in response to environmental change drivers, such as climate extremes and nitrogen (N) deposition, the presented thesis aims to assess the role of land-use and management legacies in modulating present responses to drivers of environmental change. To this end, annual radial growth rates of individual trees were measured in mature beech stands. The investigated stands differed either in their land-use history (i.e. ancient forest sites with a forest continuity > 230 years versus recent forests afforested on former arable land ~ 100 years ago) or their forest management history (i.e. managed forest sites versus short-term and long-term unmanaged forest sites). Measurements of radial growth rates were complemented by analyses of the fine root systems, soil chemical properties and crown projection areas to gain insights into the mechanisms underlying alterations in tree growth. Within the projects of the presented thesis, shifts in the climate-growth relationships driven by land-use and management legacies were analysed. In addition, land-use legacy mediated differences in the climate-nitrogen-growth relationships were assessed. The key findings are: (I) Soil legacy driven alterations in the fine root systems cause a higher sensitivity of radial increment rates to water deficits in summer for trees growing on recent forest sites than for trees growing on ancient forest sites. (II) Management legacies (in terms of tree release) enhance the sensitivity of beech’s radial growth to water deficits in spring through changes in crown sizes. (III) Interacting effects of spring water deficits and co-occurring high deposition of reactive N compounds lead to stronger radial growth declines in trees growing in ancient forests. This is likely caused by resource allocation processes towards seed production, which is, in turn, mirrored by decreasing radial growth rates. In this context, high N deposition likely boosts mass fructification in beech trees. Overall, it has been demonstrated that the ecological continuity plays a crucial role in modulating both climate sensitivity and the growth response to interacting effects of water deficits and nitrogen deposition in beech trees. The presented thesis identified a trade-off between the climate sensitivity and maximised growth rates within beech trees, depending on forest history. The results show that the growth of beech in ancient, unmanaged beech forests is less sensitive to water deficits than in recent and managed beech forests. Additionally, interacting effects of spring water deficits and N deposition likely increase the reproductive effort of beech trees, particularly in ancient forests. Thus, the results of this thesis once again underpin the uniqueness of ancient, unmanaged beech forests, whose importance for the conservation of biodiversity has been widely acknowledged. In summary, the presented thesis highlights the need to consider the ‘ecological memory’ of forest ecosystems when predicting responses to current and future environmental changes.
