Refine
Language
- English (17) (remove)
Keywords
- Export (8)
- Germany (7)
- Deutschland (6)
- Exports (6)
- Produktivität (6)
- productivity (6)
- Gewerkschaft (3)
- micro data (3)
- Arbeitsproduktivität (2)
- Auslandsinvestition (2)
- Betriebsrat (2)
- Lohn (2)
- Personenbezogene Daten (2)
- Unternehmer (2)
- exporter wage premium (2)
- foreign direct investment (2)
- heterogeneous firms (2)
- union membership (2)
- wages (2)
- Anfang (1)
- Arbeitgeber (1)
- Arbeitnehmer (1)
- Ausfuhrüberschuss (1)
- Deutsche <Bundesrepublik> (1)
- East Germany (1)
- Ende (1)
- Entry (1)
- Export entry (1)
- Export-sales ratio (1)
- German unions (1)
- Gewerkschaft / Nichtmitglied (1)
- Gewerkschaft <Motiv> (1)
- Gewerkschaftsmitglied (1)
- Globalisierung (1)
- Heterogenität (1)
- Labor productivity (1)
- Lineares Regressionsmodell (1)
- Nascent entrepreneurs (1)
- Necessity entrepreneurship (1)
- Ostdeutschland (1)
- REM (1)
- Stochastik (1)
- Stochastische Dominanz (1)
- Unternehmensgründung (1)
- West Germany (1)
- Westdeutschland (1)
- Wissensproduktion (1)
- Works councils (1)
- Zerfall (1)
- continuous treatment (1)
- decline in German unionism (1)
- decomposition (1)
- dose-response function (1)
- exit (1)
- export exit (1)
- exports (1)
- globalization (1)
- infant entrepreneurs (1)
- knowledge production function (1)
- labour productivity (1)
- linked employer-employee data (1)
- literature survey (1)
- opportunity entrepreneurship (1)
- quantile regressions (1)
- stochastic (1)
- stochastic dominance (1)
- union density (1)
- works councils (1)
Institute
Works Councils, Labor Productivity and Plant Heterogeneity: First Evidence from Quantile Regressions
(2006)
Using OLS and quantile regression methods and rich cross-section data sets for western and eastern Germany, this paper demonstrates that the impact of works council presence on labor productivity varies between manufacturing and services, between plants that are or are not covered by collective bargaining, and along the conditional distribution of labor productivity. No productivity effects of works councils are found for the service sector and in manufacturing plants not covered by collective bargaining. Besides demonstrating that it is important to look at evidence based on more than one data set, our empirical findings point to the efficacy of supplementing OLS with quantile regression estimates when investigating the behavior of heterogeneous plants.
This paper contributes to the flourishing literature on exports and productivity by using a unique newly available panel of exporting establishments from the manufacturing sector of Germany from 1995 to 2004 to test three hypotheses derived from a theoretical model by Hopenhayn (Econometrica 1992): (H1) Firms that stop exporting in year t were in t-1 less productive than firms that continue to export in t. (H2) Firms that start to export in year t are less productive than firms that export both in year t-1 and in year t. (H3) Firms from a cohort of export starters that still export in the last year of the panel were more productive in the start year than firms from the same cohort that stopped to export in between. While results for West Germany support all three hypotheses, this is only the case for (H1) and (H2) in East Germany.
This paper presents the first nonparametric test whether German works councils go hand in hand with higher labor productivity or not. It distinguishes between establishments that are covered by collective bargaining or not. Results from a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for first order stochastic dominance tend to indicate that pro-productive effects are found in firms with collective bargaining only. However, the significance level of the test statistic is higher than a usually applied critical level. This somewhat weak evidence casts doubts on the validity of results from recent parametric approaches using a regression framework that point to high positive effects of works councils on productivity.
Based on data from a recent representative survey of the adult population in Germany this paper documents that the patterns of variables influencing nascent and infant entrepreneurship are quite similar and broadly in line with our theoretical priors – both types of entrepreneurship are fostered by the width of experience and a role model in the family, and hindered by risk aversion, while being male is a supporting factor. Results of this study using cross section data are in line with conclusions from longitudinal studies for other countries finding that between one in two and one in three nascent entrepreneurs become infant entrepreneurs, and that observed individual characteristics – with the important exception of former experience as an employee in the industry of the new venture - tend to play a minor role only in differentiating who starts and who gives up.
Using panel data from Spain Farinas and Ruano (IJIO 2005) test three hypotheses from a model by Hopenhayn (Econometrica 1992): (H1) Firms that exit in year t were in t-1 less productive than firms that continue to produce in t. (H2) Firms that enter in year t are less productive than incumbent firms in year t. (H3) Surviving firms from an entry cohort were more productive than non-surviving firms from this cohort in the start year. Results for Spain support all three hypotheses. This paper replicates the study using a unique newly available panel data sets for all manufacturing plants from Germany (1995 – 2002). Again, all three hypotheses are supported empirically.
Using a large recent representative sample of the adult German population this paper demonstrates that nascent necessity and nascent opportunity entrepreneurs are different with respect to some of the characteristics and attitudes considered to be important for becoming a nascent entrepreneur, and that they behave differently. Given the lack of longitudinal data, however, we have no information about the performance of entrepreneurs from both groups in the longer run.
While the role of exports in promoting growth in general, and productivity in particular, has been investigated empirically using aggregate data for countries and industries for a long time, only recently have comprehensive longitudinal data at the firm level been used to look at the extent and causes of productivity differentials between exporters and their counterparts which sell on the domestic market only. This papers surveys the empirical strategies applied, and the results produced, in 45 microeconometric studies with data from 33 countries that were published between 1995 and 2004. Details aside, exporters are found to be more productive than non-exporters, and the more productive firms self-select into export markets, while exporting does not necessarily improve productivity.
This paper presents the first empirical test with German establishment level data of a hypothesis derived by Helpman, Melitz and Yeaple in a model that explains the decision of heterogeneous firms to serve foreign markets either trough exports or foreign direct investment: only the more productive firms choose to serve the foreign markets, and the most productive among this group will further choose to serve these markets via foreign direct investments. Using a non-parametric test for first order stochastic dominance it is shown that, in line with this hypothesis, the productivity distribution of foreign direct investors dominates that of exporters, which in turn dominates that of national market suppliers.