The 10 most recently published documents
Nachhaltigkeitsziele im Sinne einer Ökologie, Ökonomie und Soziokultur lassen sich im Bauwesen auf verschiedene Instrumente zurückführen. Optimierung des Wärmeschutzes durch die Energieeinsparverordnung (Effizienz) oder Minimierung von Abfall im Kreislaufwirtschaftsgesetz
(Suffizienz). Um jedoch eine neue Qualität der Nachhaltigkeit zu schaffen, ist ein Paradigmenwechsel notwendig. Dabei können Cradle to Cradle Prinzipien als ökoeffektive Methode angewandt werden, in dem exemplarisch die Biodiversität eingebunden, gesunde Bauprodukte verbaut und erneuerbare Energien genutzt werden. Die Natur dient als Vorbild (Konsistenz). Demnach werden Gebäude nützlich für Mensch, Umwelt und Gesellschaft umgesetzt und gleichzeitig Werte geschaffen. Für den deutschen Einzelhandel bestehen vielschichtige Potenziale, da der Gebäudebestand mit mehreren Millionen Quadratmetern bedeutend ist und die Bauwerke aufgrund von Konzeptänderungen oder Verschleiß der Ladenflächen regelmäßig umgebaut werden.
Die Forschung beginnt mit einer Bestandsaufnahme von Cradle to Cradle Bauprodukten und Analyse eines real umgesetzten Einkaufszentrums. Um Einflussfaktoren von Stakeholdern zu identifizieren, wurden qualitative Experteninterviews mit ausgewählten Projektbeteiligten
aus Bauherrn, Betreibern, Beratern, Mietparteien und Herstellern durchgeführt. Im Rahmen des Forschungsvorhabens wurde erforscht, inwieweit sich Bauprodukte aus der Gebäudeplanung in
wissenschaftlicher Theorie und praktischer Bauwirtschaft umsetzen lassen, Geschäftsmodelle anwendbar sind, Trends und Innovationen im Zusammenhang stehen oder Änderungen in Politik oder Wirtschaft notwendig sind. Im Ergebnis wurden Maßnahmen für eine neue Qualität der Nachhaltigkeit bei Einzelhandelsgebäuden identifiziert. Exemplarisch wird anhand der Interviews deutlich, dass neben einem staatlichen Umweltzeichen oder einer Green Building Planungsdisziplin,
insbesondere die Ökonomie in Form von Investitions- und Betriebskosten den größten Stellenwert besitzt. Es braucht einen staatlichen Regulierungsrahmen und neue Geschäftsmodelle, damit nachhaltige Bauprodukte wirtschaftlich werden und durch Stakeholder in
den Prozessen der Planung, Bauausführung und dem Betrieb berücksichtigt werden.
Der Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien als Ausprägung des klimaschutzpolitischen Substitutionsansatzes wird in Deutschland mithilfe verschiedener Gesetze gesteuert. Dabei haben sich in mehr als 30 Jahren umfangreiche Regelungsstrukturen herausgebildet. Besonders ausgeprägt ist dies im Stromsektor zu beobachten. Hier kön-nen ausgehend vom Kartellrecht über den Zwischenschritt des Stromeinspeisungsgesetzes bis zu den verschie-denen Fassungen des Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetzes vielfältige Entwicklungslinien anhand ausgewählter kon-kreter Veränderungen aufgezeigt werden. Sowohl im Hinblick auf Änderungsdynamik wie -tiefe deutlich weni-ger ausgeprägt sind dagegen die Entwicklungslinien im Wärmesektor. Diese nehmen ihren gesetzlichen Ur-sprung erst 2009 mit dem Erneuerbare-Energien-Wärmegesetz, um dann zusammen mit den gebäudebezoge-nen Effizienzregelungen 2020 infolge eines umfassenden rechtlichen Konsolidierungsschritts im Gebäudeener-giegesetz zu münden.
Die Ausgestaltungsschritte im deutschen Erneuerbare-Energien-Recht sind auf vielfältige Weise mit den Ent-wicklungen im europäischen Rechtsrahmen zur Steuerung des Ausbaus der erneuerbaren Energien verwoben. Dies betrifft zunächst die Judikatur zu den primärrechtlichen Anforderungen an die Ausgestaltung mitglied-staatlicher Förderinstrumente, gilt aber besonders für die Entwicklungen im Sekundärrecht. Hier hat sich seit 2001 in mehreren Schritten eine immer detailliertere sekundärrechtliche Ordnung entwickelt. Dabei beinhalten die Entwicklungen der Erneuerbare-Energien-Richtlinien nicht nur eindimensional Steuerungs- und Bindungs-wirkungen von der supranationalen in Richtung der mitgliedstaatlichen Ebene. Vielmehr finden sich darin auch Entwicklungen zur Beschränkung der europarechtlichen Einflüsse, namentlich der Vorgaben zur Warenver-kehrsfreiheit und des Beihilferechts, die eine unmittelbare Reaktion der Mitgliedstaaten auf die Entscheidun-gen der europäischen Gerichte und der Europäischen Kommission darstellen.
Das Erneuerbare-Energien-Recht ist zudem eingebettet in das übergreifende Umweltenergie- und Klima-schutzrecht. Mit der sowohl auf europäischer als auch deutscher Ebene im Werden befindlichen umfassenden Klimaschutzordnung lassen sich ebenso wie mit dem sich fortlaufend ändernden Instrumentenmix zahlreiche Wechselwirkungen feststellen. Der mit der neuen Klimaschutz-Governance geschaffene prozedurale Rahmen etabliert ein System von Klimaschutzzielen, Evaluierungs- und Nachsteuerungsvorgaben. Dieser ist aber mit dem Erneuerbare-Energien-Recht und dessen Zielen nur lose verbunden. Detaillierungsgrad und Steuerungs-wirkung der europäischen und der deutschen Klimaschutz-Governance unterscheiden sich dabei deutlich, was auch mit den stärkeren Koordinationsbedürfnissen im eher vertikal orientierten supranationalen Regelungs-verbund begründet ist.
Dass die Entwicklung im Erneuerbare-Energien-Recht in absehbarer Zeit zu einem Endpunkt gelangen könnten, ist nicht zu erwarten. Dies wird deutlich, wenn die tatsächlichen Herausforderungen der Transformation und aktuell diskutierte Themenfelder für die weitere Fortschreibung dieses Rechtsbereichs betrachtet werden. Dabei sind die verschiedenen Dimensionen der Integration erneuerbarer Energien zur Vertiefung der System-transformation ebenso von Bedeutung, wie Regelungen zu Akzeptanz und Teilhabe sowie zur Beantwortung der Verteilungsfragen einerseits und eine Reduktion des Komplexitätsumfangs im Recht anderseits.
Consisting of three articles and a framework manuscript, this cumulative dissertation deals with sustainable compensation of chief executive officer (CEO) with a focus on climate-related aspects. Against the backdrop of the European action for sustainability and the EU Green Deal, the dissertation pays special attention to the consideration of climate-related aspects of corporate performance in CEO compensation. In this context, sustainable compensation is characterized by the consideration of long-term interests and sustainability of the company as well as by the inclusion of financial and non-financial aspects of environmental, social and governance performance (ESG) in compensation agreements. While this novel instrument of corporate governance aims to incentivize the implementation of sustainability-oriented corporate strategy, it is particularly important to unfold this incentive effect at the individual CEO level in view of their managerial discretion. The framework manuscript discusses the research objectives, the regulatory and theoretical background, the results of the dissertation and their implications in the context of regulation, research, and business practice. The essence of the dissertation are the three articles. The first article, "Determinants and effects of sustainable CEO compensation: a structured literature review of empirical evidence," examines the current state of empirical research based on 37 articles that were published between 1992 and 2018. Based on a multidimensional research framework, the structured literature review compiles past research findings, identifies contentual and methodological foci in the research area, and derives questions for future research. The second article, "Mapping the determinants of carbon-related CEO compensation: a multidimensional approach," addresses the topic from a conceptual perspective. Taking the existing work as a starting point, a conceptual framework is derived, which organizes the determinants of carbon-related CEO compensation at societal, organizational, group and individual levels of analysis. On this basis, eight propositions are presented that seek to distinguish between the determinants which support and challenge the implementation of carbon-related CEO compensation. The third article, "Climate change policies and carbon-related CEO compensation systems: an exploratory study of European companies," focuses on the use of CO2-oriented performance indicators in CEO compensation. The empirical-qualitative study analyzes corporate disclosure of the 65 largest companies in the EU for the years 2018 and 2019. The study addresses the use of CO2-oriented performance indicators in corporate strategy and CEO compensation. It also examines which compensation components are determined with the help of CO2-oriented performance indicators, which type of performance indicators are used, and whether CO2-intensive and less CO2-intensive companies differ in this regard.
This research report presents a transdisciplinary student research project on the development of climate resilience of communities on the Caribbean Island Dominica.
The research was conducted through a partnership between the Leuphana University Lüneburg and the Sustainable Marine Financing Programme (SMF) of the GIZ.
For the GIZ, the research project aimed at improving the understanding of the socio-ecological resilience framework for tackling problems of Marine Managed Areas and Marine Protected Areas. Also, it enabled new thoughts on how the GIZ and other development agencies can more effectively assists island states to better cope with the challenges of climate change.
The role of the students from the “Global Environmental and Sustainability Sciences” programme of Leuphana University included the design of four transdisciplinary research projects to research aspects of resilience of Caribbean communities.
The developing island states in the Caribbean are extremely vulnerable to more frequent and intense natural hazards while relying on the ecosystem services that are also at risk from extreme weather events, in particular Hurricanes. Low economic stability leads to a dependency of the states on international assistance. To decrease the vulnerability to shocks, counteracting measures that encourage learning and adaptation can increase the resilience against extreme weather events and their consequences.
Concepts that were considered during the design of the transdisciplinary research projects were the adaptation of systems, diversity and stakeholder participation and resilience-focused management systems. Also, the students critically assessed the concept of foreign aid and how it can be successful, mitigating the risk of introducing neo-colonial structures. Flood Management, Biodiversity, Small-Scale Agriculture and Foreign Aid on Dominica were the topics of the transdisciplinary projects. The research methods of a literature review, stakeholder mapping, interviews, scenario development and visioning were used in the projects.
In four scenarios developed in the ‘Flood Management’ project, it became evident that a broad as well as coordinated stakeholder engagement and a variety of measures are required for community resilience. A key finding of the ‘Biodiversity’ project was the identity dimension of community resilience, underlining the importance of the relationship between individuals and nature. The interlinkage of social identity processes and a resilient disaster response was also stressed by the project ‘Foreign Aid’, which highlighted that financial support is similarly important to inclusivity and reflexivity in the process of resource distribution. To recover from extreme weather events, the social memory also plays an important role. The project on ‘Small-scale Agriculture’ concluded, that the memory-making of local communities is as vital to community resilience as formal plans and trainings.
The research project was based on the research approach of transdisciplinarity because of its solution-orientation. It links different academic disciplines and concepts, and non-scientific stakeholders are included to find solutions for societal and related scientific problems. In the four projects, principles of transdisciplinary research were party applied, but some challenges arose due to the geographical distance, time constraints and a strong focus on the scientific part in some phases. Nonetheless, the findings of the projects provide valuable learning lessons to be applied in practice and that can prove useful for future research.
Understanding that entrepreneurship can be better modeled from a systemic point of view is a primordial aspect that determines the important role of universities in entrepreneurial ecosystems. What makes the ecosystem approach a valuable tool for understanding social
systems is that, from a holistic perspective, their behavior seems to have emerging characteristics. The impact of this “research object” can only be revealed through interrelated causal chains similar to the behavior of natural ecosystems (Mars et al., 2012). Therefore, the
entrepreneurial ecosystem concept provides a unique perspective that complements previous studies on networked economic activity with a clear focus on the systemic elements that support entrepreneurship, and an emphasis on policy that promote the entrepreneurial process.
This dissertation presents a dual scientific account of the entrepreneurship phenomenon in universities. The work is divided into two equal parts, each of which is composed of two research papers. The narrative of the first half takes on a macro perspective view, consisting of one theoretical and one empirically-based conceptual case study. This part conceptually depicts a systematic approach to entrepreneurialism in higher education, namely an ecosystems
perspective. The second half concentrates on the meso- and micro levels of study from the university’s point of view, comprising of a case study as historical account for the emergence of the entrepreneurial university, and of a metasynthesis of empirical case studies in entrepreneurial universities, which serves as the basis for the development of entrepreneurial university archetypes.
This doctoral work contributes to an in-depth understanding of Entrepreneurship in universities regarding its systemic qualities and archetypal characteristics of entrepreneurial universities. It argues for an ecosystem’s perspective on the phenomenon of entrepreneurial
activity, highlighting the fundamental role that universities play as the heart of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Furthermore, this research expands on the novel concept of the entrepreneurial university by using extensive case study literature to empirically identify distinct archetypes that better reflect the diverse reality of how universities engage as entrepreneurial actors by way of differentiated entrepreneurial structures, systems, and strategies.
Die Dissertation leistet einen Beitrag zur Erforschung der Schriften John Stuart Mills, indem darin Mills rudimentär ausformulierte Denkfigur und Forschungslücke der „Art of Life“ untersucht wird. Die Autorin erweitert die traditionelle Interpretation Mills als klassischem Utilitaristen um einen geschärften Blick auf Mills Handhabung des antiken Theorieelements der Tugend. Drei überlappende thematische Zugänge – Lust, Charakter, Glückseligkeit – dienen der Veranschaulichung und Stärkung der These, wonach es sich bei Mills Theorie um eine hedonistische, perfektionistisch gefärbte Theorie der guten Lebensführung handelt. Der methodische Rückgriff auf die Lust- und Glückskonzeption des Aristoteles erlaubt es Mills differenzierte Auffassung von Lust bzw. Freude zu ergründen, die Rolle des menschlichen Charakters für das (moralische) Handeln festzustellen und eudemische Spuren im Verständnis von Glück aufzudecken. Abschließend bietet die Dissertationsschrift eine Interpretation der Schriften Mills als Lebenskunstphilosophie mit moralischen und außer-moralischen Ebenen und zeigt Anschlusspotentiale zu antiken, sowie zeitgenössischen (Lebenskunst) Theorien auf.
Die Wahl der Rechtsform stellt im Zuge der Neugründung eines Startup-Unternehmens für die Gründer eine wichtige Entscheidung dar, denn sie beeinflusst unmittelbar den Gründungsprozess sowie im Nachhinein den Geschäftsbetrieb der
gegründeten Gesellschaft. Besonders interessant ist eine Rechtsform mit Haftungsbeschränkung, welche die beliebte GmbH als Kapitalgesellschaft ermöglicht und damit eine persönliche Haftung
der Gründungsgesellschafter verhindert. Problematisch ist jedoch für Gründungsinteressierte, die zu Anfang über nicht genügend Startkapital verfügen, die hohe Summe des geforderten Mindeststammkapitals der GmbH aufzubringen.
Hier könnte die UG (haftungsbeschränkt) als Option infrage kommen, da sie eine Haftungsbeschränkung ermöglicht und dabei kein gesetzlich festgelegtes Mindeststammkapital bei der Gründung fordert (§ 5a Abs. 1 GmbHG).
Die vorliegende Arbeit behandelt die Frage, weshalb sich die UG (haftungsbeschränkt) gerade für die Gründung eines Startup-Unternehmens als optimale Einstiegsrechtsform eignet.
Das Ziel der Arbeit ist, die UG (haftungsbeschränkt) in ihrer Besonderheit mit den speziellen Sondervorschriften, die in § 5a GmbHG verankert sind, darzustellen. Zudem soll die Verbundenheit zur GmbH aufgezeigt werden. Die Arbeit dient dabei
auch als Leitfaden für die Neugründung eines Startup-Unternehmens in Form der UG (haftungsbeschränkt) und zeigt, wie die Gründung auf einfachster Weise unter geringen Kosten mit dem Start einer UG (haftungsbeschränkt) gelingen kann.
Undertaking local actions, such as implementing public (sustainability) policy, plays a crucial role in achieving sustainable development (SD) at the municipal level. In this regard, indicator-based assessment supports effective implementation by measuring the SD process, based upon evidence-based outcomes that indicators produce. Over the last decade, using subjective indicators, which rely on an individual’s self-perception to measure subjects, has gained its significance in sustainability assessment, in line with the increasing importance of signifying individual’s and community’s well-being (WB) in the context of SD. This study aims to discuss and clarify the scope and functions of subjective sustainable development indicators (SDIs) conceptually and theoretically while examining the usability of such indicators employed in the practice of assessing sustainability policy and action process in a Japanese municipality. Furthermore, the potential usability of using subjective SDIs in monitoring a municipal initiative of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is also explanatorily examined. The present paper consists of a framework paper and three individual studies.
In the framework paper, Section 1 introduces the global transition of SD discourse and the role that local authorities and implementing public policy play in achieving SD while outlining how WB positions in the SD context. Section 2 provides a brief overview of the major scope of overall SDIs at the conceptual and theoretical levels. Section 3 defines WB in the study’s own right while exploring the scope of indicators measuring WB. In addition, this study strives to further clarify the peculiar scope of SDIs, measuring WB by synthesising the findings. Section 4 overviews how SD at the municipal level in Japan is practiced while acknowledging the extent to which residents perceive WB and SDGs in policymaking. Section 5 provides a brief yet extensive summary of the three individual studies. Section 6 discusses the findings while presenting implications for further study and practices of subjective SDIs.
Furthermore, the three individual studies provide a thorough and in-depth discussion of the study subject. Study 1 illustrates the SD trend at the municipal level in Japan and the growing recognition of using subjective SDIs in public (sustainability) policy assessment in exploring comparative SDI systems to municipality groups. The findings, in turn, raise the need for a further study on subjective SDIs. Study 2 extensively discusses the concept of WB as the overarching subject to be measured while examining varying approaches and scopes of SDIs. It identifies three differentiated WB (i.e., material and social objective WB as well as subjective WB) and distinctive approaches of subjective SDIs (i.e., expert-led and citizen-based approaches) alongside objective SDIs. The findings suggest that these SDIs identified are, conceptually, most capable of measuring associated WB; for instance, citizen-based subjective SDIs can most optimally measure subjective WB. Finally, Study 3 examines the usability of (citizen-based) subjective SDIs in a practice of assessing public policy, aiming at municipal SD, and the potential usability of using such indicators in monitoring a municipal SDG initiative. The findings highlight the determinants and obstacles of using subjective SDIs as well as signifying WB in measuring progress of a municipal SD practice.
Companies increasingly use social and environmental accounting and reporting (SEAR) to measure, manage, and report their influence on ecological and social issues, i.e., climate change and human rights violations. One reason for the increased use of SEAR is that companies aim to support sustainable aspects in their business decision-making.
Nowadays, there are many different tools, frameworks, and standards for SEAR that companies can use. Beyond the content presented in the tool itself, e.g., social and/or ecological information, these tools differ, among others, by the language used and the type of data collected (e.g., qualitative, quantitative, or monetary data). One the one hand, the range of different approaches for SEAR allows industry- and company-specific monitoring and reporting of sustainable issues. On the other hand, this variety as well as the lack of a common reference framework can lead to uncertainty of corporate decision-makers and stakeholders regarding the use and comparability of these approaches. While numerous previous scholars present advantages and opportunities of the use of SEAR for companies and society, there is a rising number of scholars criticizing the way (social and environmental) accounting and reporting is used today and its impact on a company’s environmental orientation and decision-making. Further, there is only limited literature on the question of which approach to use and how to use and introduce the particular approach for supporting sustainable decision-making within companies.
This dissertation aims to expand previous literature by clarifying the effects of SEAR on corporate decision-making and its influencing factors. Additionally, antecedents for implementation and use of SEAR in regard to supporting sustainability decision-making are discussed. For this purpose, the given dissertation investigates public sustainability reports by companies with different environmental orientation, conducts two survey-based case studies on the effects of different types of SEAR and one qualitative case study on the antecedents of institutionalizing management accounting change through SEAR.
The results lead to seven criteria that practitioners and researchers should recognize for supporting successful SEAR regarding a company’s environmental orientation, the role of employees and leadership as well as the specific SEAR tool itself. Additionally, this dissertation leads to several contributions to the scientific discussion and its influences on corporate environmental orientation and decision-making.
Globalization with its increasing emergence of global value chains is one of the main driving forces behind persisting unsustainable production and consumption patterns. The global coffee market provides a fitting example, as it is connected to many sustainability issues like the persisting poverty of coffee farmers, and degrading ecosystems. Many interventions, from
state-led regulation to industry-led certification processes, exist, that try to change global value chains to shift societies back on more sustainable trajectories. However, due to the
complexity and manifold connections between social and ecological factors, global value chains pose a wicked problem. To this date, it is still under debate if these interventions are an effective means to change global value chains. With climate change and persisting issues of social justice as strong accelerators, calls are increasingly made for a radical transformation
of global production and consumption patterns.
Many frameworks try to inform research and real-world policies for a transformation of global value chains. In this dissertation, I use the framework of the practical, political and personal
sphere proposed by O’Brien and Sygna (2013). The authors highlight that the interactions between these three spheres bare the greatest potential for a transformation towards
sustainability. However, in this dissertation, I argue that it is exactly at the nexus between the
three spheres of transformation where barriers towards a fundamental shift of systems occur.
I, therefore, use three perspectives to bring empirical nuance to the problems that arise on
the interplay between the different spheres of transformation. These perspectives are: (1) the
scientific perspective: using a systematic review of alternative trade arrangements; (2) the
producer perspective: facilitating a participatory network analysis of social-ecological challenges of Ugandan coffee farmers and their adaptive management practices; (3) the
consumer perspective: through the use of a German consumer survey and a structural
equation model to investigate into the Knowledge-Doing-Gap end-consumers are facing.
These three perspectives bring empirical nuance to the interplay between the different spheres as they highlight the real-world barriers that arise within and at the nexus of the three
spheres. Through the results from the scientific perspective, I am able to show that most of the research is investigating the certified market and that the effectiveness of labels rarely
exceeding the practical sphere. My empirical research on the producer perspective highlights that Ugandan coffee farmers facilitate a variety of on-farm crop management (practical sphere) but their support structures rarely exceed informal exchange with neighboring communities (political sphere). Exchange with governmental actors and global traders is happening but has been assessed as not sufficient to cope with the social-ecological
challenges the producers are facing. Through the results of the consumer perspective, I am
able to highlight that even though end-consumers have pro-sustainable attitudes (personal sphere) they are facing situational constraints (political sphere) that create a gap between their attitudes and the respective behavior. Using these empirical insights about drivers and barriers for a transformation I propose that frameworks, aiming to inform research and
policies, need to include two aspects: (1) the notion of a forced transformation as one of the major influencing factors for a deliberative transformation; and (2) the translational capacity
of the frameworks to create meaningful interdisciplinary discourses in different contexts. I, therefore, propose two approaches that should function as a starting point for further development of transformation frameworks (1) a fourth sphere, called the “planetary force”
to include the notion of a forced transformation that is already happening in different
contexts, highlighted by the producer perspective in this dissertation; and (2) the consequent use of methods that create interdisciplinary exchange and rigorous testing.
