Open Access

This cumulative dissertation deals with the association between corporate governance, corporate finance and corporate tax avoidance in four scientific articles. The aim of this dissertation is to explain corporate tax avoidance by (a) focusing on corporate governance institutions as determinants of tax avoidance and (b) focusing on financial consequences of tax avoidance. Due to the close association between corporate governance and the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR), the relationship between CSR and tax avoidance is also addressed. The first article with the title „The impact of corporate governance on corporate tax avoidance – A literature review“, using structured literature review methodology, analyzes extant research on the association between corporate governance and tax avoidance based on stakeholder-agency theory. However, also classical principal-agent theory is taken into account as its classical foundation. The first article identifies a number of open research questions and thereby serves as a theoretical basis for the subsequent articles. The second article with the title „CSR and tax avoidance: A review of empirical research“, also using structured literature review methodology, analyzes extant research on the association between CSR and tax avoidance. This article is also based on stakeholder-agency theory and identifies open research questions. The third article with the title „Tax Avoidance in Family Firms: Evidence from Large Private Firms“, based on results of the first article, investigates tax avoidance by German private family firms as a specific variant of corporate governance, using an empirical quantitative approach. The article finds that (a) German private family firms avoid more tax than non-family firms, that (b) tax avoidance is positively associated with the capital stake of the family and that (c) tax avoidance is positively associated with the number of shareholders in both family and non-family firms. Results reinforce that corporate tax avoidance is associated to conflicts among the shareholders of private firms. The fourth article with the title „Tax avoidance, tax risk and the cost of debt in a bank-dominated economy“ investigates the cost of debt of German public firms as a function of tax avoidance and tax risk. The article finds that (a) tax avoidance is negatively associated to the cost of debt, that (b) tax risk is positively associated to the cost of debt and that (c) the association between tax avoidance and the cost of debt becomes negative when a high level of tax risk is present.

The dissertation contains four journal articles which are embedded within a framework manuscript that interconnects the individual articles and provides relevant background information. The dissertation’s overall objective is to provide a multilayered and critical in-depth engagement with the timely phenomenon of integrated reporting (IR), a new reporting concept that is envisaged to revolutionize firms’ present reporting infrastructure. While extant corporate reports (e.g., annual financial- and CSR report) often are criticized for being disconnected and to suffer from a lack of coherence, IR intends to provide all information that is material to a firm’s short-, medium- und long-term value creation within one single, succinct document. To contribute to a set of previously defined relevant research gaps in literature, the dissertation makes use of a combined empirical-quantitative and explorative-qualitative research design. The first article entitled ‘Determinants of materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting: Empirical evidence from an international setting’ investigates a set of different IR-, corporate governance and financial accounting-specific factors that are expected to determine European and South African firms’ materiality disclosure quality. To this purpose, an original, hand-collected materiality disclosure score was developed. The second article ‘Managers’ incentives and disincentives to engage with integrated reporting, or why managers might not adopt integrated reporting: an exploratory study in a nascent setting‘ explores IR perceptions of SME managers that have not embarked on IR, but are potential candidates to do so in future. Based on a review of extant literature, the article develops a theoretical framework to subsequently discuss motives for and barriers to IR adoption. The critical discussion contributes to the academic debate on incentives for and barriers to voluntary IR adoption. The third article named ‘Does it pay off? Integrated reporting and cost of debt: European evidence’ investigates whether voluntary IR adoption among European firms is associated with lower cost of public debt. While earlier studies suggest that IR leads to lower information asymmetries, increases analyst forecasts, and decreases cost of equity, corresponding evidence for the debt market is largely missing. Subsequent analyses test as to whether such an association is even more pronounced by a firm’s environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance or its belonging to an environmentally sensitive industry. The fourth article ‘Do nonprofessional investors value the assurance of integrated reports? Exploratory evidence’ uses an experimental design to investigate nonprofessional investors’ reactions to an IR assurance. To this purpose, two separate experiments with two different groups of nonprofessional investors were carried out: one with Masters students and one with managers of large corporations. Results help to answer the question as to whether an IR assurance as well as its determinants, namely the assurance provider and the assurance level, affect nonprofessional investors’ financial decision-making. In the second step, subsequent in-depth interviews reveal an IR assurance-critical attitude among managers, who draw upon their practical experience with assurance engagements.