Refine
Das Bildungskonzept Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung (BNE) gilt als Schlüsselfaktor für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung. Durch die Entwicklung von Schlüsselkompetenzen sollen Menschen dazu befähigt werden, aktiv an der Gestaltung von Gegenwart und Zukunft im Sinne einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung zu partizipieren. Die Stärkung der Kompetenzen von Multiplikatorinnen und Multiplikatoren und somit Lehrkräften als Gestalterinnen und Gestalter formaler Bildung ist ein Ziel auf dem Weg zu einer inklusiven, qualitativ hochwertigen Bildung für alle und zur Befähigung aller, eine nachhaltige Entwicklung zu unterstützen. Es gilt, im Verlauf der Lehrkräftebildung Möglichkeiten zu schaffen, die Entwicklung relevanter Kompetenzen gezielt zu unterstützen, um effektivere Ergebnisse im Bereich BNE zu erreichen. Für den universitären Teil der Lehrkräftebildung geht dies einher mit einer entsprechenden Gestaltung von Lernumgebungen, durch die angehende Lehrkräfte relevante Kompetenzen zu Beginn ihres individuellen Bildungsweges entwickeln können. Darüber hinaus sollen durch entsprechende Fort- und Weiterbildungsformate auch bereits im Schuldienst tätige Lehrkräfte erreicht werden.
Das als transdisziplinäres Format angelegte Entwicklungsteam Sachunterricht, bestehend aus Sachunterrichtslehrkräften, Vertreterinnen und Vertretern außerschulischer Bildungsorte und Forschenden der Universität, bildet den Ausgangspunkt dieser Arbeit. Die vorliegende Arbeit fokussiert die Untersuchung von Möglichkeiten der Professionalisierung von (angehenden) Lehrkräften zu BNE im Kontext des Entwicklungsteams. Dazu wurde zunächst theoretisch-konzeptionell der Frage nachgegangen, welche Kompetenzen relevant für die Integration von BNE in Schule und Unterricht sind und wie Lehr-Lernsettings gestaltet werden sollten, um die Entwicklung entsprechender Kompetenzen zu unterstützen. Im Rahmen zweier empirischer Studien wurde anschließend einerseits die Kompetenzentwicklung seitens der Studierenden analysiert, die an einem durch das Entwicklungsteam begleiteten Seminar teilnahmen. Andererseits liegt der Fokus auf dem spezifischen Format des transdisziplinären Entwicklungsteams und es wurde untersucht, inwiefern wechselseitiges Lernen zwischen den Entwicklungsteammitgliedern initiiert werden und dies in einer Veränderung der pädagogischen Praxis resultieren kann.
Aufgrund seiner hohen Anschlussfähigkeit an den bildungswissenschaftlichen Diskurs wurde das Modell der BNE-spezifischen professionellen Handlungskompetenz den konzeptionellen Überlegungen und den darauf aufbauenden empirischen Untersuchungen zugrunde gelegt. Die Gestaltung eines Lehr-Lern-Settings für angehende Lehrkräfte mit dem Ziel der Förderung entsprechender Kompetenzen wurde anhand des Konzepts der offenen Lernumgebung vorgenommen.
Die Ergebnisse zeigen zum einen, dass das in enger Zusammenarbeit mit dem Entwicklungsteam als offene Lernumgebung durchgeführte Seminar die Professionalisierung der Studierenden unterstützt und der Aufbau von (BNE-spezifischer) professioneller Handlungskompetenz durch kollaboratives Gestalten in Kooperation mit der Praxis ermöglicht wird. Zum anderen zeigt sich, dass die transdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit ein wechselseitiges von- und miteinander Lernen zu BNE im Entwicklungsteam Sachunterricht fördert und Professionalisierungsprozesse sowohl seitens der Lehrkräfte als auch des außerschulischen Akteurs zumindest in einigen Bereichen angestoßen wurden. Ein zusätzliches Diffusionspotential für den Praxistransfer von BNE konnte in Hinblick auf das im Seminar entwickelte und an den Schulen integrierte Unterrichtsmaterial identifiziert werden. Zudem konnten im Verlauf des Seminars wechselseitige Lernprozesse zwischen Studierenden und Entwicklungsteammitgliedern initiiert werden, was die Möglichkeit eines weiteren, bisher weitestgehend unbeachteten Transfers von Innovationen wie BNE in die schulische Praxis birgt.
The industrial food system is by far the largest greenhouse gas emitting sector. It causes significant damage to terrestrial, aerial and aquatic ecosystems, negative health impacts and an unfair distribution of economic benefits. The call for sustainability transformations is growing, entailing and promoting radical shifts in industrial food systems that lead to new patterns of interactions and balanced social, economic and ecological outcomes. While traditional research has focused on sustainability problems in the food system, it lacks evidence on solutions and desired future states; and more so, on how to practically move from the current to the desired state. Food forests present a promising solution to address multiple sustainability challenges adaptable to local contexts. As biodiverse multi-strata agroforestry systems, they can provide several ecological, socio-cultural and economic services. They sequester carbon, limit soil erosion and regulate the micro-climate; they offer the opportunity for education on healthy diets and ecology, and they produce food and can create livelihood opportunities. However, despite their obvious benefits and a trend in uptake, food forests are still a niche concept rarely known in mainstream culture. To date, research has focused on their ecological and social services; we lack an understanding of food forests as a comprehensive sustainability solution, including their economic dimension, and knowledge on how to develop them. Addressing these gaps, this qualitative research used a solution- and process-oriented methodology guided by transformational sustainability research. In a comparative case study approach, it created an inventory of 209 food forests, followed by interviews and site visits of 14 sites to understand their characteristics and assess their sustainability (Article 1). More indepth, it analyzed the implementation path of seven food forest for success factors, barriers and coping strategies (Article 2). Based on these insights, two experimental case studies were initiated to develop sustainable food forests with practice partners, one based in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S. and one in Lüneburg, Germany. Two studies analyzed the cases’outputs and processes highlighting success factors and challenges, including the role of a sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystem (Article 3, Phoenix case) and key features of productive partnerships to understand why one case succeeded and the other failed (Article 4). Findings include key features of existing and sustainable food forests as well as success factors on how to develop them; namely acquiring a complementary skill set that includes specialty farming and entrepreneurial know-how, securing sufficient start-up funds and long-term land access as well as overcoming regulatory restrictions. Supporting institutions are especially needed to integrate and professionalize the planning stage and provide know-how on alternative business practices. Key features of productive partnerships include an entrepreneurial attitude, access to support functions, long-term orientation and commitment to food system sustainability. The synthesis provides a detailed, ideal-typical implementation pathway to develop sustainable food forests and relevant supportive actors. This study provides researchers, food entrepreneurs, public officials, and activists with insights on how to develop and advance food forests as a sustainability solution.
Transformative learning is increasingly set to become an essential component in sustainability transformation. This type of learning attracts considerable interest in studying and impulsing a paradigm change to transform our world into a more sustainable one, yet its underlying learning mechanisms have remained overlooked. Although there is an apparent relationship between transformative learning and sustainability transformation, little has been done to systematically explore the contribution to sustainability transformation. This learning theory developed decades ago independently of sustainability discourses; however, it provides an analytical framework for understanding the learning processes, outcomes and conditions in individual and social learning towards sustainability transformation. Against this background, the following research question arises: To which extent can transformative learning lead to sustainability transformation?
This doctoral work aims to explore transformative learning processes, outcomes, and conditions occurring and advancing towards sustainability transformation of the textile-fashion industry in Mexico. Taking an exploratory approach, the methods employed were literature reviews to untangle concepts and to construct theoretical pillars to support the empirical research design and data analysis. For data collection, snowball-sampling techniques were used to explore the practice field of the textile-fashion industry in Mexico. Qualitative interviews were employed to gather data about the learning experiences of actors. Qualitative and quantitative methods were required to perform the respective data analysis, the qualitative codification of interviewees’ responses through MAXQDA being the most remarkable one. Analysis of social media content was also utilised to understand the communication and business practices of projects involved in the transformation of the textile-fashion sector. As a result, this work comprises three articles, one a systematic literature review and two empirical research articles, investigating the transformative learning processes of entrepreneurs in the development of sustainability niches.
As for the findings of this doctoral work, the use of transformative learning in sustainability transformation requires a careful study of the theory and its conceptual elements. Regarding the case study, transformative learning is inherent in forming and developing sustainability niches as entrepreneurs venture into them: It is individual prior learning, expectations and actions that initiate the path of sustainability transformation while disorienting dilemmas, critical reflection, and discourse accelerate them. Through these stages, it is when individual learning turns into social learning. On the other hand, based on the multi-level perspective, the interplay between the niche, regime and landscape levels generates a space for sustainability transformation and transformative learning.
This work contributes to deciphering the black box of learning in sustainability transformations. The principal endeavour was to build the theoretical bridges between this emerging area of inquiry and transformative learning theory, as a significant part of this theoretical construction required drawing upon other research fields such as sustainability transitions and sustainability entrepreneurship. The crosscutting feature of learning in those fields enabled the development of an awareness of boundary objects between those fields (e.g., expectations). Furthermore, this study is pioneering in exploring sustainability transformation processes of the textile-fashion industry in Latin American contexts. The findings of this work can also be extrapolated to other sectors in which entrepreneurs participate, such as local food production, sustainable mobility, among others
This dissertation, entitled “How to Embed Sustainability in the Core of Higher Education Institutions: Drivers of, Barriers to, & Patterns behind the Implementation Processes of Sustainability Curricula – Insights from a Quantitative Meta-Study with Data from around the Globe,” addresses the question of how sustainability curricula1 can be implemented and established in higher education institutions2. This research question is based on the assumption that sustainable development requires new ways of thinking and acting in the world. Accordingly, universities – as hubs for knowledge generation, innovation, and education – provide a central leverage point for sustainably developing society at large. Therefore, the institutionalization of sustainability curricula is not only socially demanded, but also stipulated in numerous political statements from the international community (e.g., those of the UN and UNESCO) and operationalized via Sustainable Development Goal No. 4: “Quality Education”. Previous findings on how such implementation can be successful and what factors support or inhibit the process have come primarily through case studies of individual higher education institutions. These studies provide important insights but have been largely descriptive rather than analytical and leave open questions about the generalizability of their findings – for example, the extent to which other universities can be guided by the experiences of the respective higher education institutions. The present dissertation addresses this research gap. Through a meta-study (i.e., an analytical comparison of existing case studies), generalizable findings on the implementation processes of sustainability curricula are explored. In the first step, a case universe was collected in order to provide a database for deeper analyses. In two further analysis steps that built on the case universe from Step 1, certain factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of sustainability curricula (Step 2) and specific implementation patterns (Step 3) were examined. The following paragraphs provide greater details and an overview of the respective findings. In the first step, a database of peer-reviewed English-language case studies from around the globe that report on such processes was created. A total of 230 case studies were identified, 133 of which focus on the implementation processes of sustainability curricula.3 A bibliometric analysis of the 230 case studies revealed that this field of research is growing, although the discourse is primarily dominated by authors from North America, Europe, Oceania, and Asia, with South America and Africa being underrepresented. In addition, a citation analysis demonstrated that some universities incorporate findings from other countries whereas other universities act in isolation. This observation leaves open the question of the extent to which universities learn from one another in order to advance the implementation of sustainability curricula. In the second step of the analysis, the qualitative data of the collected case studies (sample of 133 case studies) were compared using the case survey method, which is a specific type of a meta-1 Sustainability curricula include courses, programs, and certificates from all fields of study that deal in some form with sustainability topics. For a more-detailed discussion of what education for sustainable development (ESD) entails, see Section Error! Reference source not found..
2 Higher education institutions (HEIs) include universities, universities of applied sciences, and other institutions that offer at least a bachelor’s degree.
3 A detailed explanation of the case sample and subsamples can be found in Section Error! Reference source not found..
analysis. The focus of the comparison lay on the drivers of and barriers to the processes of sustainability curriculum implementation at higher education institutions. Driving- and inhibiting factors have been thoroughly examined theoretically in the discourse on education for sustainable development (ESD), especially those pertaining to higher education institutions. However, no large body of data has yet been created to empirically test these hypotheses. The present meta-study found that the following factors lead to the deep-rooted and comprehensive establishment of sustainability curricula: strong leadership support; the establishment of sustainability curricula in the areas of education, research, campus operations, and outreach activities; formal participation of internal (including students) and external stakeholders; and engagement by sustainability champions (change agents), who are often the first to implement sustainability curricula and can face strong resistance. Other enabling factors include strategic planning, coordination, communication, having a vision, external political influence, the presence of a window of opportunity (e.g., an environmental disaster, a change in presidency), and the availability of interdisciplinary meeting spaces. On the other hand, the strongest cited barriers to the implantation of sustainability curricula were found to be the lack of interdisciplinary meeting spaces, the lack of a vision, the lack of incentives, the lack of resources, an overly full curriculum, and an unsupportive / overly bureaucratic organizational structure. The third step of the analysis also built on data from the 133 case studies and explored whether certain types or patterns of implementation processes occur. Through the analysis, six implementation patterns were identified that share similar driving- and inhibiting factors. The respective interplay between factors leads to various degrees of sustainability curriculum implementation in terms of how deeply rooted and comprehensive this implementation is. As discussed in greater detail below, in descending order of the level of achieved deep-rooted change, these patterns are (1) a collaborative paradigm shift, (2) bottom-up institutional change, (3) top-down institutional change, (4) the presence of many barriers that hinder institutional change, (5) externally driven initiatives, and (6) initiatives that are scattered due to a lack of coordination. Across all patterns, two phases could be identified: First, the impetus to implement ESD may be initiated not only by internal actors, but also by external ones. This initiation can take hold from the “bottom-up” (i.e., by students or faculty), from the “top-down” (i.e., at the presidential level), or in both directions simultaneously. The following key factors appear to be important in driving the initial implementation forward: a culture of open communication between all stakeholders in which feedback and reflection are welcome and even actively solicited, the development of a shared understanding and vision that further create a sense of ownership and long-term success, a high level of collaboration among all stakeholders, and existing initiatives that lead to knowledge sharing and other resources. In this regard, informal collaboration and cooperation can partially compensate for a lack of presidential-level support and/or a formal communication structure. Furthermore, developing a strategy with individual steps and shared responsibility leads to more-successful implementation of ESD at higher education institutions. The presented findings add a complementary empirical perspective to the discourse on the establishment of ESD at higher education institutions. First, the case studies that specifically address the implementation processes of sustainability curricula are reviewed and analyzed here for the first time as part of a research landscape. This research landscape reveals where research on such implementation processes has been or is being conducted. On this basis, both researchers and funders can reflect on the status quo and plan further research- or funding endeavors. Second, this dissertation offers the opportunity to compare a multitude of individual case studies and thus to develop new and generalizable insights into the implementation of sustainability curricula. The empirical analysis uses 133 case studies to identify key factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of sustainability curricula and to add a complementary perspective to the discourse, which has thus far been dominated by theoretical considerations and individual case studies. The analysis thereby offers a new perspective on generalizable influencing factors that appear to be important across different contexts. Thus far, specific patterns of implementation processes have been infrequently studied, and with few datasets. This dissertation analyzes the complex interplay between over 100 variables and provides one of the first research attempts at better understanding the processes that lead to the deep-rooted and comprehensive implementation of sustainability curricula. Internal and external practitioners of higher education institutions can find examples and evidence that can be useful in planning the next steps of their sustainability curriculum implementation. In the future, higher education institutions will play an even greater role in the journey toward sustainable development. This dissertation offers generalizable empirical findings on how universities can succeed in recognizing their own responsibility to that end and in realizing this transformation through the implementation of ESD.
TIME for REFL-ACTION: Interpersonal competence development in projectbased sustainability courses
(2021)
This dissertation investigates interpersonal competence development in project-based sustainability courses. Visions of a sustainable, safe, and just future cannot be reached by one individual alone. Thus, future change agents need to be able to collaborate and engage with stakeholders, to approach the manifold crises, challenges, problems, and conflicts we are facing together, and to promote and push forward sustainability transitions and transformations. Therefore, this research investigates three project-based sustainability graduate courses by comparing and contrasting teaching and learning outcomes, processes, and environments. A comparative case study approach using a Grounded Theory-inspired research design which triangulates several qualitative methods and perspectives is applied to allow for generalizable insights. Thereby, this dissertation provides empirically-informed insights which are further discussed in relation to selected teaching and learning theories. This leads, first, to a discussion of practical implications within (and beyond) sustainability higher education; and second, provides a theoretical foundation for interpersonal competence development in project-based learning settings – so that educating future change agents can gain momentum.
Findings of this research show that embracing conflicts when they occur (i.e. before they provoke cascading effects in the form of further conflicts down-the-road) is an effective strategy to help further develop interpersonal competence. This requires a conflict-embracing attitude. Attitude, in general, seems to be key in interpersonal competence and competence development overall. Self-reflection, if not explicitly required by outside influences (such as instructors), arises naturally from a self-reflective attitude, and is shown to provide the basis for developing interpersonal competence. This research introduces the term ‘Refl-Action’ which stresses the importance of pairing ‘learning by doing’ (as is often the focus in project-based learning settings) with conscious moments of ‘reflecting about the doing’.
More specifically, the research presented here identified four learning processes for interpersonal competence development: receiving input, experiencing, reflecting, and experimenting. Based on the empirical data, when the four processes are purposefully combined, following a meaningful sequence attitudes, knowledge, and skills in collaborative teamwork and impactful stakeholder engagement, are fostered (two facets of interpersonal competence). Each of the four learning processes is set in motion through various interactions students engage in during project-based sustainability courses: student-student (labeled ‘peer’), student-instructor (labeled ‘deliberate’), student-stakeholder (labeled ‘professional’), and student-mentor (labeled ‘supportive’) interactions. When these interactions are made explicit subjects of inquiry – i.e. the (inter-)action is linked with (self-)reflection – different learning processes complement one another: Interpersonal competence facets (collaborative teamwork and impactful stakeholder engagement) and domains (attitudes, knowledge, skills) are fostered. While, overall, interactions, processes, and conflicts have been identified as supportive for interpersonal competence development, trust has emerged as another variable inviting further investigation.
The findings of this thesis can be useful not only to support more conscious course design and facilitation, but should also be taken into consideration in other project-based (sustainability) settings. Both, sustainability novices and experts are regularly required to engage in teams and with stakeholders. Applying a conflict-embracing and self-reflective attitude allows to actively deal with differences encountered where diverse people interact, and to move forward on sustainability problems and visions in collaboration.
A matter of connection: Competence development in teacher education for sustainable development
(2021)
In response to the globally increasing environmental, social, and economic crises, we as humanity must leave the path of business as usual and learn new ways to know, think, and act which may enable us to build a more sustainable future for all. In their role as facilitators, teachers in general are considered one, if not the most important, factor for successful learning. The implementation of education for sustainable development (ESD) across all education systems and preparing students to act as future change agents and lead the societal transformation towards sustainability also largely depends on competent and committed teachers. Correspondingly, the focus of political agendas and scientific research increasingly shifts to the effective education of educators.
The different competence models that are currently being discussed in the international discourse around teacher education for sustainable development (TESD) suggest various sets of intended learning outcomes (ILOs). Yet, they usually share the assumption that teachers require ESD-related knowledge, pedagogical skills, and motivation to successfully implement ESD at the school level. In accordance with the concept of ESD-specific professional action competence (Bertschy et al., 2013), educational offers in ESD for pre-service teachers should also develop their content knowledge (CK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) as well as a positive attitude towards ESD. However, in the sense of a comprehensive construct, this concept has not yet been operationalized or measured. Furthermore, there is still a lack of deeper understanding as to how to best design individual courses as teaching and learning environments in TESD in order to support competence development in student teachers.
Based on a dual case study, this cumulative dissertation investigates how individual ESD courses, as part of the teacher education programs at Leuphana University in Lüneburg/ Germany and Arizona State University (ASU) in Tempe/USA, actually foster students’ ESD-specific professional action competence. Furthermore, this work sheds light on the link between learning processes and outcomes, to reveal which factors actually affect the achievement of ILOs and competence development.
The findings of this study indicate that both courses under investigation eventually live up to their role and increased student teachers’ competence and commitment to implement ESD in their future careers; yet, mainly due to their different thematic foci, to varying degrees. Additionally, the four Cs (personal, professional, social, and structural connections) were revealed as significant factors that support students’ learning and should be considered when planning and designing course offerings in TESD, with the goal of developing students’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes.
Globalization with its increasing emergence of global value chains is one of the main driving forces behind persisting unsustainable production and consumption patterns. The global coffee market provides a fitting example, as it is connected to many sustainability issues like the persisting poverty of coffee farmers, and degrading ecosystems. Many interventions, from state-led regulation to industry-led certification processes, exist, that try to change global value chains to shift societies back on more sustainable trajectories. However, due to the complexity and manifold connections between social and ecological factors, global value chains pose a wicked problem. To this date, it is still under debate if these interventions are an effective means to change global value chains. With climate change and persisting issues of social justice as strong accelerators, calls are increasingly made for a radical transformation of global production and consumption patterns. Many frameworks try to inform research and real-world policies for a transformation of global value chains. In this dissertation, I use the framework of the practical, political and personal sphere proposed by O’Brien and Sygna (2013). The authors highlight that the interactions between these three spheres bare the greatest potential for a transformation towards sustainability. however, in this dissertation, I argue that it is exactly at the nexus between the three spheres of transformation where barriers towards a fundamental shift of systems occur. I, therefore, use three perspectives to bring empirical nuance to the problems that arise on the interplay between the different spheres of transformation. These perspectives are: (1) the scientific perspective: using a systematic review of alternative trade arrangements; (2) the producer perspective: facilitating a participatory network analysis of social-ecological challenges of Ugandan coffee farmers and their adaptive management practices; (3) the consumer perspective: through the use of a German consumer survey and a structural equation model to investigate into the Knowledge-Doing-Gap end-consumers are facing. These three perspectives bring empirical nuance to the interplay between the different spheres as they highlight the real-world barriers that arise within and at the nexus of the three spheres. Through the results from the scientific perspective, I am able to show that most of the research is investigating the certified market and that the effectiveness of labels rarely exceeding the practical sphere. My empirical research on the producer perspective highlights that Ugandan coffee farmers facilitate a variety of on-farm crop management (practical sphere) but their support structures rarely exceed informal exchange with neighboring communities (political sphere). Exchange with governmental actors and global traders is happening but has been assessed as not sufficient to cope with the social-ecological challenges the producers are facing. Through the results of the consumer perspective, I am able to highlight that even though end-consumers have pro-sustainable attitudes (personal sphere) they are facing situational constraints (political sphere) that create a gap between their attitudes and the respective behavior. Using these empirical insights about drivers and barriers for a transformation I propose that frameworks, aiming to inform research and policies, need to include two aspects: (1) the notion of a forced transformation as one of the major influencing factors for a deliberative transformation; and (2) the translational capacity of the frameworks to create meaningful interdisciplinary discourses in different contexts. I, therefore, propose two approaches that should function as a starting point for further development of transformation frameworks (1) a fourth sphere, called the “planetary force” to include the notion of a forced transformation that is already happening in different contexts, highlighted by the producer perspective in this dissertation; and (2) the consequent use of methods that create interdisciplinary exchange and rigorous testing.
