Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Dissertation (15)
- Bachelorarbeit (3)
Schlagworte
- Nachhaltigkeit (5)
- Transformation (2)
- Betrieb (1)
- Einzelhandel (1)
- Energiewende (1)
- Energy Transition (1)
- Entrepreneurship (1)
- Erneuerbare Energien (1)
- Forschungsevaluation (1)
- Ganzheitliches Denken (1)
- Informationssystem (1)
- Interdisziplinäre Forschung (1)
- Lüneburg (1)
- Nachhaltigkeitsbericht (1)
- Nachhaltigkeitsforschung (1)
- Renewable Energies (1)
- Research Evaluation (1)
- Schlüsselkompetenz (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Sustainability Research (1)
- Umweltschutz (1)
- sustainability (1)
- systems thinking (1)
Transformative learning is increasingly set to become an essential component in sustainability transformation. Despite, little has been done to systematically explore the contribution to sustainability transformation. This learning theory developed decades ago independently of sustainability discourses; however, it provides an analytical framework for understanding the learning processes, outcomes and conditions in individual and social learning towards sustainability transformation. Against this background, the following research question arises: To which extent can transformative learning lead to sustainability transformation? This doctoral work aims to explore transformative learning processes, outcomes, and conditions occurring and advancing towards sustainability transformation of the textile-fashion industry in Mexico. Taking an exploratory approach, the methods employed were literature reviews to untangle concepts and to construct theoretical pillars to support the empirical research design and data analysis. For data collection, snowball-sampling techniques were used to explore the practice field of the textile-fashion industry in Mexico. Qualitative interviews were employed to gather data about the learning experiences of actors. Qualitative and quantitative methods were required to perform the respective data analysis, the qualitative codification of interviewees' responses. Analysis of social media content was also utilised to understand the communication and business practices of projects involved in the transformation of the textile-fashion sector. As a result, this work comprises three articles, one a systematic literature review and two empirical research articles, investigating the transformative learning processes of entrepreneurs in the development of sustainability niches. As for the findings of this doctoral work, the use of transformative learning in sustainability transformation requires a careful study of the theory and its conceptual elements. Regarding the case study, transformative learning is inherent in forming and developing sustainability niches as entrepreneurs venture into them: It is individual prior learning, expectations and actions that initiate the path of sustainability transformation while disorienting dilemmas, critical reflection, and discourse accelerate them. Through these stages, it is when individual learning turns into social learning. On the other hand, based on the multi-level perspective, the interplay between the niche, regime and landscape levels generates a space for sustainability transformation and transformative learning.
Despite growing research on sustainability transformations, our understanding of how transformative transdisciplinary research can support local actors who foster change towards sustainability is still somewhat limited. To contribute to this research question, the investigator conducted research in a transdisciplinary case study in Southern Transylvania, where non-governmental organizations (NGO) drive sustainability initiatives to foster desired changes (e.g., supporting small-scale farmers or conserving natural and cultural heritage). Interactions with these local actors and reflections on the research question shaped the research of this dissertation. In paper 1, the author conducted a literature review on amplification processes that describe actions, which local actors can apply to increase the impact of their sustainability initiatives. In paper 2, he conducted a literature review on the application of indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) in sustainability transformations research to understand whether this research engages with the conceptualization of transformations from local actors. The results show that ILK is generally applied to confirm and complement scientific knowledge in contexts of environmental, climate, social-ecological, and species change. In paper 3, the author derived principles that provide guidance for how to integrate sustainability initiatives from local actors in transformative transdisciplinary research. Based on his transdisciplinary research with the NGOs in Southern Transylvania and by using systems and futures thinking as an approach for analysis, he derived three principles that provide guidance for the co-design of sustainability intervention strategies that build on, strengthen, and complement existing initiatives from local actors. In paper 4, the author explored empirically how to identify relevant local actors for collaborations that seek to intervene in specific characteristics of a system (e.g., parameters or design of a system). He applied a leverage points' perspective to analyse the social networks of the NGOs in Southern Transylvania that amplify the impact of their initiatives. This dissertation as a whole contributes insights to three recommendations of how transformative transdisciplinary research can support local actors fostering change towards sustainability: First, by conducting research that studies and supports local actors who increase the impact of their sustainability initiatives via amplification processes (Paper 1 and 4); Second, by engaging specifically with the initiatives, networks, and knowledge from local actors, who foster bottom-up, place-based transformations (Paper 1-4); Third, by identifying and collaborating with local actors that are relevant for strategic systems interventions that build on, strengthen, and complement existing initiatives (Paper 3-4).
Transforming the International Food Supply – Sustainable Practices in Small Intermediary Businesses
(2021)
The global food system faces many complex challenges, and there is general agreement that a transformation is needed. While localizing food has been proposed as a means to this end, changing global food supply chains may also lead to sustainable food systems. Because most food systems today have an international dimension and are likely to remain connected, on one way or another, to other ones across the globe, it is necessary to find solutions to problems such as exploitation or environmental degradation. Addressing this challenge and the related gap in the literature, this study examines the emerging practices of small intermediary food businesses, which act between agricultural producers and consumers, and may have the potential to advance sustainability in international food supply. Including a systematic review of the literature on food systems change (Study#1), this dissertation adopts a transformational sustainability research methodology, which is solution-oriented, aims to integrate system, target and transformation knowledge, and is characterized by a transdisciplinary research practice. It conceptualizes challenges of international food supply and empirically investigates entrepreneurial solution approaches to address these challenges (Study#2). Two transdisciplinary research projects with small coffee businesses located in Germany, Mexico, and the U.S. were conducted to examine how these approaches could be implemented (Study#3, Study#4, Workshop reports 1+2). Overall, this study shows that challenges in international food supply chains can be conceptualized as negative effects of large geographical and relational distances. It also identifies five entrepreneurial solution approaches specified by twelve sustainability-oriented design principles to address these negative effects. Creating relational proximity between supply chain actors, that is, strong relationships based on knowledge and care, seems to be a key factor to advance sustainability in international food supply.The results also suggest that by building such strong relationships and changing the fundamental principles of international food trade, small intermediary businesses could be important agents in food system transformations.
Als Fallstudie wird im ersten Paper der Einsatz der Szenarioanalyse als ein zentrales Element des Forschungsdesigns im Projekt „Sustainable University“ beleuchtet. Mit einem formalen Ansatz wurden Szenarien zum zukünftigen Umfeld der Hochschullandschaft entwickelt. Dieses Paper zeigt detailliert die notwendigen Denkschritte bei der Szenarioentwicklung auf und hilft zu verstehen, an welchen Punkten Integrationsschritte in Bezug auf Wissensarten und Perspektiven unterstützt und geleistet werden und somit auch (soziale) Lernprozesse gefördert werden können. Ferner werden die konkreten Ergebnisse der Szenarioanalyse vorgestellt und diskutiert. Zur Untersuchung von Lerneffekten wird die Methode der Szenarioanalyse in einen formalen Bildungskontext transferiert. Das zweite Paper leistet einen konzeptionellen Beitrag. Einleitend werden spezifische individuelle Kompetenzen diskutiert, die aus der Perspektive der Bildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung zum Umgang mit dem Klimawandel als komplexes Nachhaltigkeitsproblem und zu einer aktiven Teilnahme an Transformationsprozessen der Gesellschaft wichtig sind. Die Kompetenzen, wie proaktives Denken, der Umgang mit Unsicherheiten und unterschiedlichen Wissensbeständen sowie das vernetze Denken konnten hier beschrieben werden. Anschließend werden zwei Forschungsmethoden, der Syndromansatz und die Szenarioanalyse, für den Kontext der formalen Bildung nutzbar gemacht, und es wird theoretisch abgeleitet, wie in diesen Lernsettings die eingangs identifizierten Kompetenzen gefördert werden können. Die Szenarioanalyse bietet beispielsweise beim Denkschritt der Entwicklung von Zukunftsprojektionen großes Potential für Reflexionsprozesse oder die Integration von Wissen und Perspektiven zur Förderung der Kompetenz des proaktiven Denkens in Alternativen. Die diskursive Bewertung von Konsistenzen während der Szenarioerstellung birgt ähnliches Potential zur Förderung des vernetzten Denkens. Im dritten Paper wird ein Messinstrument für die Kompetenz des vernetzen Denkens (systems thinking) entwickelt. Es leistet einen empirischen Beitrag zur Lehr-Lernforschung, respektive zur Kompetenzmessung im Bereich der BNE. Dieses Instrument erfasst mit Hilfe eines Similarity Judgment Tests (SJT) den Grad der Vernetzung von Konzepten eines bestimmten Kontextes, in dem konkreten Fall von Aspekten des Klimawandels. In einer prä-post-Studie wurden zwei Kontroll und zwei Versuchsgruppen, die an dem zuvor genannten Lernsetting im Rahmen von Seminaren an der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg teilgenommen haben, empirisch begleitet. Auch wenn keine statistisch signifikanten Veränderungen des vernetzten Denkens der Teilnehmenden nachgewiesen werden konnten, bedeutet das nicht, dass die zuvor abgeleiteten Einflüsse der Szenarioanalyse widerlegt sind. Hier sind weitere Studien und die Weiterentwicklung des Messinstruments nötig. Zudem wurde nur ein Teil möglicher Einflüsse auf die Kompetenzentwicklung untersucht. Für die Szenarioanalyse als Lernsetting lässt sich schlussfolgern, dass zum einen der Moderation von Reflexions- und Diskussionsprozessen während unterschiedlicher Phasen eine sehr wichtige Rolle zukommt und sie einen wesentlichen Einfluss auf Lernprozesse hat. Zum anderen ist den Phasen, in denen Lernen stattfinden kann, genügend Zeit einzuräumen, so dass transdisziplinäre oder interdisziplinäre Forschungsprozesse mit der Methode Szenarioanalyse auch das Potential für Lernprozesse entfalten können. So kann mit Hilfe der Szenarioanalyse ein Setting geschaffen werden, in dem individuelle mentale Modelle und Handlungsmuster hinterfragt und Kompetenzen im Umgang mit komplexen Problemen gefördert werden, und somit individuelles und soziales Lernen für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung stattfinden kann.
This thesis aims to contribute to a better understanding of the actual implementation of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Following three aims, this work likes to (1) contribute to the measurability of transdisciplinary research processes as well as their societal and academic outputs and impacts, to (2) demarcate transdisciplinary research from other modes of research in sustainability science and to (3) identify and examine the determinants that shape the contribution of transdisciplinary research to societal action for sustainable development and to scientific knowledge production. To serve these aims a mixed methods approach is applied that combines strong quantitative elements with in-depth qualitative analyses that integrate the perspectives of practitioners. This thesis provides a broad set of indicators to describe and assess transdisciplinary research that translate theoretical concepts form transdisciplinarity theory into observable variables. The indicators offer a holistic perspective on transdisciplinary research by representing research mode characteristics, societal as well as scientific outcomes of research projects and their specific context. To theoretically demarcate transdisciplinary research from other forms of research, a narrative literature review first elaborates the differences between "normal science", political use of scientific knowledge and transdisciplinarity in their underlying logics of problem definition, knowledge production and research utilization. Subsequently, these concepts were compared with perspectives and expectations of practitioners in the forest sector on integrative research settings. Moreover, a cluster analysis of data from 59 research projects identified five research modes that empirically demarcate ideal-typical transdisciplinary research from other research modes within sustainability science: (1) purely academic research, (2) practice consultation, (3) selective practitioner involvement, (4) ideal-typical transdisciplinary research and (5) practice-oriented research. Based on this finding, transdisciplinary research can be characterized as an intensive, but balanced involvement of practitioners. It incorporates not only the needs and goals of the practitioners but also their norms and values. Ideal-typical transdisciplinary research goes beyond mere consultatory research approaches and must be distinguished from what is conceptualized as applied research. Regression analysis of 81 research projects and statistical group comparisons of the five research mode clusters show that societal and academic outputs and impacts vary with specific project characteristics and combinations of project characteristics defined as research modes. The findings indicate that more interactive research modes reach more societal impacts. In particular, the involvement of practitioners in early project phases and the targeted dissemination of the research results positively affect societal impacts. This finding also aligns with practitioner expectations on integrative research and research utilization, provided by qualitative analysis. Moreover, the quantitative results show that scientific outputs and impacts decrease with the intensity of interactions, indicating a trade-off between societal and scientific outcomes and impacts. Overall, the empirical results of this thesis support the claimed effectiveness of transdisciplinary research in providing societally relevant, applicable knowledge and encourage further funding of transdisciplinary research by funding agencies.
Design methods for collaborative knowledge production in inter- and transdisciplinary research
(2022)
This dissertation seeks to better understand how design methods facilitate collaborative knowledge production and integration in inter- and transdisciplinary sustainability research. Through five independent papers, this dissertation contributes to addressing the research question on four levels – conceptual-epistemological, empirical, methodological and practical. By exploring the linkages between design research and inter- and transdisciplinary research, a conceptual basis for the targeted use of design methods in collaborative processes of inter- and transdisciplinary research is laid and their spectrum of methods is expanded. This is followed by the development of a transformative epistemology in and for problem-oriented, collaborative forms of research, such as transdisciplinary sustainability research, called problematic designing. Based on a deeper understanding of integration and collaborative knowledge production, as well as its accompanying challenges, empirical research into applying design prototyping as a method in and for situations of collaborative research was conducted. To this end, the findings provide a fundamental basis for the facilitation of inter- and transdisciplinary research processes when dealing with complex problems. With its inherent openness and iterative approach in addressing the unknowns of complex phenomena, design prototyping contributes to the required form of imagination that enables to anticipate possible futures. Furthermore, by including visual-haptic modes of expression, design prototyping reduces the dominance of language and text in scientific negotiation processes and does justice to the diversity of cognitive modes. Finally, the empirical findings of this dissertation emphasise the importance of the visual-haptic dimension for collaborative knowledge production and the communication of knowledge, and provide insights into the visual structuring of human thought processes. The results on material metaphors, collaborative prototyping and material-metaphorical imagery contribute decisively to the basic knowledge of the epistemological quality of design and the importance of the visual and haptic for thought processes in general. The extension and adaptation of existing analysis methods in this dissertation add to the further development of analysis of visual-haptic data. The results are once again reflected in the synthesis of this framework paper as cross-cutting issues.
Food forests present a promising solution to address multiple sustainability challenges adaptable to local contexts. As biodiverse multi-strata agroforestry systems, they can provide several ecological, socio-cultural and economic services. They sequester carbon, limit soil erosion and regulate the micro-climate; they offer the opportunity for education on healthy diets and ecology, and they produce food and can create livelihood opportunities. However, despite their obvious benefits, food forests are still a niche concept. To date, research has focused on their ecological and social services; we lack an understanding of food forests as a comprehensive sustainability solution, including their economic dimension, and knowledge on how to develop them. Addressing these gaps, this qualitative research used a solution- and process-oriented methodology guided by transformational sustainability research. In a comparative case study approach, it created an inventory of 209 food forests, followed by interviews and site visits of 14 sites to understand their characteristics and assess their sustainability (Article 1). More indepth, it analyzed the implementation path of seven food forest for success factors, barriers and coping strategies (Article 2). Based on these insights, two experimental case studies were initiated to develop sustainable food forests with practice partners, one based in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S. and one in Lüneburg, Germany. Two studies analyzed the cases' outputs and processes highlighting success factors and challenges, including the role of a sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystem (Article 3, Phoenix case) and key features of productive partnerships to understand why one case succeeded and the other failed (Article 4). Findings include key features of existing and sustainable food forests as well as success factors on how to develop them; namely acquiring a complementary skill set that includes specialty farming and entrepreneurial know-how, securing sufficient start-up funds and long-term land access as well as overcoming regulatory restrictions. Supporting institutions are especially needed to integrate and professionalize the planning stage and provide know-how on alternative business practices. Key features of productive partnerships include an entrepreneurial attitude, access to support functions, long-term orientation and commitment to food system sustainability.