Open Access

Audit quality is of crucial importance because it underpins the integrity of financial markets and thus enables complex international transactions. However, despite extensive research on audit quality, the interaction between structures, practices, and behaviors within accounting firms still remains a ´black box´. To open up the ´black box´ I draw on insights from the field of error management which has been highlighted to be central to gain a better understanding of audit quality. In this dissertation, I develop my arguments in three articles that build on each other. In the first paper, I systematically review the literature on the antecedents of audit quality and I suggest future research directions. In the second paper, I take an inductive case study approach to gain an in-depth understanding of error management in accounting firms. The resulting socio-cognitive model of error management informs both the field of error management, as well as the field of audit quality. In the third paper, I examine a crucial component of the socio-cognitive model: the individual. In a two-phase mixed methods study I investigate individual differences in error management and their implications for learning and performance. Taken together, the three articles of this dissertation contribute by providing an innovative approach to our understanding of both error management and audit quality.