Refine
Summary
Since the early 2000s, ecosystem services strongly gained significance as a research topic. While the number of papers strongly increased, the concept was further developed which changed the way it was applied. From highlighting the value of ecosystems by viewing them not only from an ecological, but also from an economic perspective in the beginning, it is nowadays, among others, used to map and calculate the monetary value of ecosystem services. Lately, the International Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) further developed the concept into Nature’s contributions to people (NCP) which puts a stronger emphasis on stakeholders and indigenous knowledge.
However, so far none of the conceptual developments managed to integrate the temporal dimension of ecosystem services into this concept, although this should be the basis for a sustainable long-term management of ecosystems and their services.
Therefore, I present three articles in this thesis that deal with temporal aspects of ecosystem services. In two of them I also present a proposal for a framework for the classification of ecosystem services based on their temporal dynamics.
In this dissertation I differentiate between two types of temporal aspects, both of which have in common that change takes place over a certain period of time. The concepts of transformation, transition and regime shift are used to describe changes in social or ecological systems as a whole, for example the transformation towards a more sustainable society. The temporal dynamics that I present, on the other hand, relate to the temporal changes in ecosystem services themselves.
The first article focuses on how the literature on ecosystem services incorporates social and ecological change, illustrated by the concepts of transformation, transition, and regime shift. The second and third articles deal with the temporal dynamics of ecosystem services. While the second article presents a preliminary framework for categorizing the temporal dynamics of ecosystem services, the third article uses this framework to test how the temporal dynamics of ecosystem services are represented in the literature.
Based on the insights from the three articles, I conclude that most of the studies on ecosystem services only focus on one point in time. One reason for this is that most studies are conducted over a maximum of a four-year time span which does not allow to monitor dynamics over longer time spans. In most articles that do account for temporal aspects, the focus is strongly on the side of ecological supply of ecosystem services rather than on the demand-side which leads to the exclusion of stakeholder perceptions and therefore, makes it impossible to connect ecosystem service demand and supply over time. Moreover, the concept of change that is used most often in the literature is that of regime shifts which comes from a purely ecological background and focuses mostly on changes that happened in the past. This neglects the possibility of change towards a positive outcome in the future. In general, there is a strong disciplinary divide in the concepts and terminology used. This leads to a lack of exchange between different scientific disciplines and non-academic stakeholders. Approaches that are needed to solve problems of ecosystem service management are therefore impeded.
To enable future research to better account for temporal aspects and connect supply and demand sides of ecosystem services with each other, I give four recommendations for future research. These are (I) take temporal dynamics into account by conducting long-term research, (II) ensure conceptual clarity, (III) create a solution-oriented agenda and (IV) take the demand side into account by involving stakeholders’ perceptions over time.
By following these recommendations, future research could help to support the sustainable management of ecosystem services as dynamics will be better known and targeted measures can be implemented.
