Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Dissertation (6)
- Bericht (5)
- Research Paper (4)
- Buch (Monographie) (1)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (1)
- Masterarbeit (1)
- Rezension (1)
Schlagworte
- Deutschland (19) (entfernen)
Institut
- Frühere Fachbereiche (10)
- Fakultät Bildung (1)
- Fakultät Kulturwissenschaften (1)
- Fakultät Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Informatik/Wirtschaftsinformatik (1)
- Institut für Nachhaltigkeitssteuerung (INSUGO) (1)
- Institut für Sozialarbeit und Sozialpädagogik (IFSP) (1)
- Institut für Ökologie (IE) (1)
- Sozialarbeit / Sozialpädagogik (1)
Eine steigende Zahl älterer Menschen lebt in Deutschland im Zustand der Altersarmut oder ist von Altersarmut bedroht. Die Klärung von Dimensionen der Altersarmut in Deutschland steht im Zentrum der Dissertation. Anhand der Gerechtigkeitstheorie von Martha C. Nussbaum, dem Capability Approach, lassen sich globale Dimensionen von (Alters-)Armut ermitteln. Die Altersarmutswirklichkeit in Deutschland wird durch die christliche Sozialethik beschrieben und die globalen Armutsdimensionen werden in den bundesdeutschen Armutskontext gesetzt. Aus den ermittelten Grundlagen zur Altersarmut in Deutschland ergibt sich eine erste ganzheitliche Definition des Begriffs ‚Altersarmut’. Dieser Begriffsentwurf soll einer wissenschaftlichen, interdisziplinären Diskussion ausgesetzt werden. Die Ergebnisse der Forschungsarbeit ermöglichen Handlungsempfehlungen für Gesellschaft, Staat, Soziale Arbeit und die Menschen, die zum Abbau, zur Vermeidung und zur Bewältigung von Altersarmutszuständen beitragen können.
The future of forests is closely linked to climate change and energy transition because the preconditions for forest management are changed through climate and energy policies (Beland Lindahl and Westholm 2012). Forest management has multiple objectives, and different stakeholders have competing interests in forests. A strong dichotomy between environmental and economic interests has characterized forest policy and most conflicts about forests in the past (Winkel and Sotirow 2011). Climate change and energy transition modify this established conflict line because new conflicts related to climate mitigation, climate adaptation, and renewable energies have blurred the clear opposition between environmental and economic interest (Mautz 2010). In the context of the new challenges of climate change and energy transition, the need for effective, efficient and legitimate forest governance is gaining a new importance. Based on 86 qualitative interviews about forest conflicts and forest governance in five qualitative case studies, theoretical approaches focusing on multi-level and multi-scale governance are merged with the field of environmental and natural resource conflict research in this thesis. Forest conflicts and their governance are a multi-level and multi-scale issue. However, not so much is known about how collective and individual state and non-state actors act in complex governance systems and how they perceive governance systems. In order to contribute to the understanding of these knowledge gaps, this thesis tests the applicability of three theoretical perspectives on multiple scales and levels of decision-making (multi-level governance, polycentricity, politics of scale) to fruitfully study forest conflicts. Furthermore, the thesis provides empirical insights about forest conflicts in the face of energy transition and climate change. Based on the theoretical and empirical findings, this thesis provides practical recommendations to policy makers and practitioners on how to improve governance in forestry and the management of other natural resources. For example, this thesis shows the importance of considering different actor constellations in participatory processes at different governance levels, and that not every actor will react the same way to a certain method of decision-making. Furthermore, this thesis illustrates how trust building measures, such as enhanced communication between stakeholders, transparency in decision-making and forest education can reduce the risk of destructive conflict escalation. This thesis also demonstrates that energy transition and the discussion about climate change are sources of new conflicts, can change old conflicts, and add new, additional levels to forest governance. Thus, climate change and energy transition cause further fragmentation of forest governance and make forest governance more multi-level, create additional venue-shopping opportunities, and bring new actors into forest governance, causing new power constellations in the policy field. Forest governance is in a reconfiguration process which can be conceptualized as shift towards multi-level governance. Level choice and the relation of state and non-state actors in decision-making are important aspects of governance, thus the theoretical approach has yielded valuable insights in forest conflicts and the importance of scale construction in conflict discourses can be illustrated. Different levels are associated with different functions, strengths, and weaknesses of stakeholders; the perceptions of appropriate scale choice are often based on frames. The empirical findings have shown that level choice is often a normative and/or cultural decision, often no objective ´best´ decision-making level exists. Some actors consider different competing, overlapping, and nested decision-making levels to be an opportunity for interest realization; others feel helpless and overwhelmed in complex, multi-level systems. Different re-scaling strategies (up-scaling, down-scaling, fit re-scaling) are applied by actors to realize their interests. Non-state actors have an important function in linking processes from different levels. However, multi-level governance and related concepts have their limits for the explanation of forest conflict processes because some important factors cannot be captured with this approach. For example, social-psychological factors and conflict frames are important for the understanding of conflict development and governance and at a local level individual action and the relations between individuals crucially set the preconditions for the governance of conflicts.
This paper uses data from the German Socio-Economic Panel for the years 2000 to 2005 to study the earnings differential between self- and dependent employed German men. Constructing a counterfactual earnings distribution for the self-employed in dependent employment and using quantile regression decompositions we find that the earnings differential over the distribution cannot be explained by differences in endowments. Furthermore, low-earning self-employed could earn more in dependent employment. Finally, the observed earnings advantage for the self-employed at the top of the earnings distribution is not associated with higher returns to observable variables.
Die Realschulen und ihre Bildungsgänge sind bisher wenig erforscht. Zwar gehören „methodische Mischansätze“ heute selbstverständlich zur Forschungsstrategie, a-ber an dieser Untersuchung ist es neu, dass es sich um eine interdisziplinäre Ana-lyse des Bildungsganges auf mehreren Ebenen handelt, d. h. es wird die theoreti-sche, historische, empirische, strukturelle und curriculare Perspektive dargestellt, da eine begrenzte Sicht zur Beantwortung der Fragen nicht ausreicht. Hintergrund ist die aus multikausalen Gründen in Bewegung geratene Bildungsde-batte: Der Aufbau eines Schulsystems in den neuen Ländern führte zu neuen Or-ganisationsformen, die Bildungsaspiration lässt durch die Expansion neue Richtungen der Schülerströme entstehen, die eine schrumpfende Hauptschule, eine begehrte Realschule und ein attraktives Gymnasium mit sich bringen. Knappe Finanzen lassen die Notwendigkeit von Schülertransporten zugunsten mehrerer Schulangebote vor Ort überdenken, internationale Studien zur Leistungsmessung (TIMSS, PISA) schrecken die deutschen Bildungsforscher durch die schlechten Ergebnisse der deutschen Schülerinnen und Schüler auf. Das Zusammenwachsen der europäi-schen Staaten stellt erhöhte Anforderungen an alle Beteiligten. Indem wesentliche Strukturfragen unseres Schulsystems mit dem Realschulbil-dungsgang untersucht werden, dient diese differenzierte Sichtweise dem wissen-schaftlichen Fortschritt.
This paper traces the profound decline in German unionism over the course of the last three decades. Today just one in five workers is a union member, and it is now moot whether this degree of penetration is consistent with a corporatist model built on encompassing unions. The decline in union membership and density is attributable to external forces that have confronted unions in many countries (such as globalization and compositional changes in the workforce) and to some specifically German considerations (such as the transition process in postcommunist Eastern Germany) and sustained intervals of classic insider behavior on the part of German unions. The ‘correctives’ have included mergers between unions, decentralization, and wages that are more responsive to unemployment. At issue is the success of these innovations. For instance, the trend toward decentralization in collective bargaining hinges in part on the health of that other pillar of the dual system of industrial relations, the works council. But works council coverage has also declined, leading some observers to equate decentralization with deregulation. While this conclusion is likely too radical, German unions are at the cross roads. It is argued here that if they fail to define what they stand for, are unable to increase their presence at the workplace, and continue to lack convincing strategies to deal with contemporary economic and political trends working against them, then their decline may become a rout.
Using unique recently released nationally representative high-quality data at the plant level, this paper presents the first comprehensive evidence on the relationship between productivity and size of the export market for Germany, a leading actor on the world market for manufactured goods. It documents that firms that export to countries inside the euro-zone are more productive than firms that sell their products in Germany only, but less productive than firms that export to countries outside the euro-zone, too. This is in line with the hypothesis that export markets outside the euro-zone have higher entry costs that can only by paid by more productive firms.