Open Access

Over the last decades corporate irresponsibility has gained increasing interest among practitioners and researchers. Corporate irresponsibility is often the result of intentionally irresponsible strategies, decisions, or actions, which negatively affect an identifiable stakeholder or environment. For instance, these range from the violation of the human rights and labor standards to environmental damages. Organizations enacting irresponsible practices rely on different factors upon multiple levels (field, organizational, individual) and its interrelations as well as processes evolving within the organization leading to such behavior. However, reasons for the occurrence of and explanations for corporate irresponsibility so far have been limited, leaving a fragmented understanding of this phenomenon. This dissertation helps to improve the understanding and explanation of corporate irresponsibility by identifying driving patterns of corporate irresponsibility and showing how the interactions across multiple levels add to this phenomenon. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the topic of corporate irresponsibility, the theoretical approaches of this dissertation and an introduction to the chapters. The second chapter offers a review and analysis of the corporate irresponsibility literature. The chapter presents a variance model outlining the concept, antecedents, moderators and outcomes of recent corporate irresponsibility literature as well as the different factors across levels (field, organizational, individual). Chapter 2 offers a critical analysis of what we know by referring to current literature and offers insights on what we don´t know by deriving main implications for future research on corporate irresponsibility. Chapter 3 enlarges the understanding of corporate irresponsibility introducing a process approach to explain how corporate irresponsibility evolves over time and under which conditions. Based on a qualitative meta-analysis findings converge around two distinct process paths of corporate irresponsibility, the opportunistic-proactive, and, the emerging-reactive, subdivided into three phases. Chapter 3 sheds different lights upon the phases of corporate irresponsibility and its underlying mechanisms. The final chapter 4 focuses on different underlying mechanisms driving the final downfall or demise of organizations, organizational failure. Chapter 4 offers an alternative explanation to the competing extremism and inertia mechanisms driving organizational failure in recent studies by suggesting that these explanations are rather complementary. In addition, chapter 4 enlarges the explanation of organizational failure identifying the role of conflict mechanisms and its interplay with rigidity mechanisms. In sum, this dissertation contributes to a better understanding of what causes and increases corporate irresponsibility, and a better explanation of how and why corporate irresponsibility and organizational failure emerges, develops, grows or terminates over time. Hopefully all three articles motivate more research on this important topic to prevent such behavior in advance. 4

Research on motivational and cognitive processes in entrepreneurship has commonly relied on a static approach, investigating entrepreneurs´ motivation and cognition at only one point in time. However, entrepreneurs´ motivation and cognition are dynamic processes that considerably change over time. The goal of this dissertation is thus to adopt a dynamic perspective on motivational and cognitive processes in entrepreneurship. In three different chapters, I examine dynamic changes in the level and impact of three different processes, i.e., creativity, entrepreneurial passion, and opportunity identification. In Chapter 2, I develop a theoretical model on the alternating role of creativity in the course of the entrepreneurial process. The model emphasizes that the effects of two components underlying creativity, i.e., divergent and convergent thinking, considerably change both in magnitude and in direction throughout the entrepreneurial process. In Chapter 3, I establish and empirically test a theoretical model on entrepreneurial passion. The theoretical analysis and empirical results show that the relationships between feelings of entrepreneurial passion, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial success are dynamic and reciprocal rather than static and unidirectional. In Chapter 4, I develop and test a theoretical model on the effect of entrepreneurship training on opportunity identification over time. The theoretical and empirical investigation indicates that entrepreneurship training effects systematically decay over time and that action planning and entrepreneurial action sustain the effects in the long term. Altogether, the research reported in this dissertation provides novel insights into entrepreneurs´ motivation and cognition which more static approaches would have obscured. Moreover, the theoretical and empirical results of each chapter resolve apparent contradictions in past research and integrate hitherto fragmented theoretical perspectives into more inclusive theoretical frameworks. Thereby, this dissertation represents an important step toward a more integrated understanding of motivational and cognitive mechanisms underlying successful entrepreneurship.

Network analysis methods have long been used in the social sciences. About 25 years ago, these methods gained popularity in various other domains and many real-world phenomena have been modeled using networks. Well-known examples include (online) social networks, economic networks, web graphs, metabolic networks, infrastructure networks, and many more. Technological development made it possible to store and process data on a scale not imaginable decades ago — a development that also includes network data. A particular characteristic of network data is that, unlike standard data, the objects of interest, called nodes, have relationships to (possibly all) other objects in the network. Collecting empirical data is often complicated and cumbersome, hence, the observed data are typically incomplete and might also contain other types of errors. Because of the interdependent structure of network data, these errors have a severe impact on network analysis methods. This cumulative dissertation is about the impact of erroneous network data on centrality measures, which are methods to assess the position of an object, for example a person, with respect to all other objects in a network. Existing studies have shown that even small errors can substantially alter these positions. The impact of errors on centrality measures is typically quantified using a concept called robustness. The articles included in this dissertation contribute to a better understanding of the robustness of centrality measures in several aspects. It is argued why the robustness needs to be estimated and a new method is proposed. This method allows researchers to estimate the robustness of a centrality measure in a specific network and can be used as a basis for decision making. The relationship between network properties and the robustness of centrality measures is analyzed. Experimental and analytical approaches show that centrality measures are often more robust in networks with a larger average degree. The study of the impact of non-random errors on the robustness suggests that centrality measures are often more robust if missing nodes are more likely to belong to the same community compared to missingness completely at random. For the development of imputation procedures based on machine learning techniques, a process for the evaluation of node embedding methods is proposed.

Der Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien als Ausprägung des klimaschutzpolitischen Substitutionsansatzes wird in Deutschland mithilfe verschiedener Gesetze gesteuert. Dabei haben sich in mehr als 30 Jahren umfangreiche Regelungsstrukturen herausgebildet. Besonders ausgeprägt ist dies im Stromsektor zu beobachten. Hier kön-nen ausgehend vom Kartellrecht über den Zwischenschritt des Stromeinspeisungsgesetzes bis zu den verschie-denen Fassungen des Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetzes vielfältige Entwicklungslinien anhand ausgewählter kon-kreter Veränderungen aufgezeigt werden. Sowohl im Hinblick auf Änderungsdynamik wie -tiefe deutlich weni-ger ausgeprägt sind dagegen die Entwicklungslinien im Wärmesektor. Diese nehmen ihren gesetzlichen Ur-sprung erst 2009 mit dem Erneuerbare-Energien-Wärmegesetz, um dann zusammen mit den gebäudebezoge-nen Effizienzregelungen 2020 infolge eines umfassenden rechtlichen Konsolidierungsschritts im Gebäudeener-giegesetz zu münden. Die Ausgestaltungsschritte im deutschen Erneuerbare-Energien-Recht sind auf vielfältige Weise mit den Ent-wicklungen im europäischen Rechtsrahmen zur Steuerung des Ausbaus der erneuerbaren Energien verwoben. Dies betrifft zunächst die Judikatur zu den primärrechtlichen Anforderungen an die Ausgestaltung mitglied-staatlicher Förderinstrumente, gilt aber besonders für die Entwicklungen im Sekundärrecht. Hier hat sich seit 2001 in mehreren Schritten eine immer detailliertere sekundärrechtliche Ordnung entwickelt. Dabei beinhalten die Entwicklungen der Erneuerbare-Energien-Richtlinien nicht nur eindimensional Steuerungs- und Bindungs-wirkungen von der supranationalen in Richtung der mitgliedstaatlichen Ebene. Vielmehr finden sich darin auch Entwicklungen zur Beschränkung der europarechtlichen Einflüsse, namentlich der Vorgaben zur Warenver-kehrsfreiheit und des Beihilferechts, die eine unmittelbare Reaktion der Mitgliedstaaten auf die Entscheidun-gen der europäischen Gerichte und der Europäischen Kommission darstellen. Das Erneuerbare-Energien-Recht ist zudem eingebettet in das übergreifende Umweltenergie- und Klima-schutzrecht. Mit der sowohl auf europäischer als auch deutscher Ebene im Werden befindlichen umfassenden Klimaschutzordnung lassen sich ebenso wie mit dem sich fortlaufend ändernden Instrumentenmix zahlreiche Wechselwirkungen feststellen. Der mit der neuen Klimaschutz-Governance geschaffene prozedurale Rahmen etabliert ein System von Klimaschutzzielen, Evaluierungs- und Nachsteuerungsvorgaben. Dieser ist aber mit dem Erneuerbare-Energien-Recht und dessen Zielen nur lose verbunden. Detaillierungsgrad und Steuerungs-wirkung der europäischen und der deutschen Klimaschutz-Governance unterscheiden sich dabei deutlich, was auch mit den stärkeren Koordinationsbedürfnissen im eher vertikal orientierten supranationalen Regelungs-verbund begründet ist. Dass die Entwicklung im Erneuerbare-Energien-Recht in absehbarer Zeit zu einem Endpunkt gelangen könnten, ist nicht zu erwarten. Dies wird deutlich, wenn die tatsächlichen Herausforderungen der Transformation und aktuell diskutierte Themenfelder für die weitere Fortschreibung dieses Rechtsbereichs betrachtet werden. Dabei sind die verschiedenen Dimensionen der Integration erneuerbarer Energien zur Vertiefung der System-transformation ebenso von Bedeutung, wie Regelungen zu Akzeptanz und Teilhabe sowie zur Beantwortung der Verteilungsfragen einerseits und eine Reduktion des Komplexitätsumfangs im Recht anderseits.

My dissertation embraces four empirical papers addressing socio-economic issues relevant to policy-makers and society as a whole. These papers cover important aspects of human life including health at birth, life satisfaction, unemployment periods and retirement decisions, and are intended to provide a contribution to the respective research areas. The analyses are carried out applying advanced econometric methods and are based on data sets consisting of survey data as well as administrative records. The joint paper with Alessandro Palma and Daniela Vuri "Prenatal Air Pollution Exposure and Neonatal Health" in Chapter 2 investigates the causal impact of prenatal exposure to air pollution on neonatal health in Italy in the 2000s combining detailed information on mother’s residential location from birth certificates with PM10 concentrations from air pollution monitors. Variation in local weekly rainfall is exploited as an instrumental variable for non-random air pollution exposure. Using quasi-experimental variation in rainfall shocks allows to identify the effect of PM10, ruling out potential bias due to confounder pollutants. The paper estimates the effect of exposure for both the entire pregnancy period and separately for each trimester to test whether the neonatal health effects are driven by pollution exposure during a particular gestation period. This information enhances our understanding of the mechanisms at work and help prevent pregnant mothers from most dangerous exposure periods. Additionally, the effects of prenatal exposure to PM10 are estimated by maternal labor market status and maternal education level to understand how the pollution burden is shared across different population groups. This decomposition allows to identify possible mechanisms through which environmental inequality reinforces the negative impact of early-life exposure to air pollution. This study finds that average PM10 and days with PM10 level above the hazard limit reduce birth weight, gestational age, and measures of overall newborn health. Effects are largest for third trimester exposure and for low-income and less educated mothers. These findings imply that further policy efforts are needed to fully protect fetuses from the adverse effects of air pollution and to mitigate the environmental inequality of health at birth. The joint paper with Christian Pfeifer "Life Satisfaction in Germany After Reunification: Additional Insights on the Pattern of Convergence" in Chapter 3 updates previous findings on the total East-West gap in overall life satisfaction and its trend by using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel for the years 1992 to 2013. Additionally, the effects are separately analyzed for men and women as well as for four birth cohorts. The results indicate that reported life satisfaction is, on average, significantly lower in East than in West German federal states and that part of the raw East-West gap is due to differences in household income and unemployment status. The conditional East-West gap decreased in the first years after the German reunification and remained quite stable and sizable since the mid-nineties. The results further indicate that gender differences are small. Finally, the East-West gap is significantly smaller and shows a trend towards convergence for younger birth cohorts. The joint paper with Christian Pfeifer "Unemployment Benefits Duration and Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Germany" in Chapter 4 explores the effects 2 of a major reform of unemployment benefits in Germany on the labor market outcomes of individuals with some health impairment. The reform induced a substantial reduction in the potential duration of regular unemployment benefits for older workers. This work analyzes the reform in a wider framework of institutional interactions, which allows to distinguish between its intended and unintended effects. The results based on routine data collected by the German Statutory Pension Insurance and a Difference-in-Differences design provide causal evidence for a significant decrease in the number of days in unemployment benefits and increase in the number of days in employment. However, they also suggest a significant increase in the number of days in unemployment assistance, granted upon exhaustion of unemployment benefits. Transitions to unemployment assistance represent an unintended effect, limiting the success of a policy change that aims to increase labor supply via reductions in the generosity of the unemployment insurance system. The single-authored paper "How Older Workers Respond to Raised Early Retirement Age: Evidence from a Kink Design in Germany" in Chapter 5 explores how an increase in the early retirement age affects labor force participation of older workers. The analysis is based on a social security reform in Germany, which raised the early retirement age over several birth cohorts to boost employment of older people and ultimately alleviate the burden on the public pension system. Detailed administrative data from the Federal Employment Agency allow to distinguish between employment and unemployment as well as disability pensions and retirement benefits claims. Using a Regression Kink design in a quasi-experimental framework, I show that the raised early retirement age had positive employment effects and negative effects on retirement benefits claims. The reform did not affect unemployment benefits or disability pensions claims. My results also show that some population groups are more sensitive to a reduction in retirement options and more likely to seek benefits from other government programs. In this respect, I find that workers in manufacturing sector respond to the raised early retirement age by claiming benefits from the disability insurance program designed to compensate for reduced earnings capacity due to severe health problems. The treatment heterogeneity analysis further suggests that high-wage workers are more likely to delay exits from employment, which is in line with incentives but might also indicate an increased inequality within the affected birth cohorts induced by the reform. Finally, women seem to rely on alternative sources of income such as retirement benefits for women, or spouse's or partner's income not observed in the data. All things considered, workers did not adjust to the increased early retirement age by substituting early retirement with other government programs but rather responded to the reform in line with the policy intent. At the same time, the findings point to heterogeneous behavioral responses across different population groups. This implies that raising the early retirement age is an effective policy tool to increase employment only among older people who have the real choice to delay employment exits. Therefore, reforms that raise statutory ages should ensure social support for workers only marginally attached to the labor market or not able to work longer due to potential health problems or other circumstances.

In the face of uncertainty, ecosystems can provide natural insurance to risk averse users of ecosystem services. We employ a conceptual ecological-economic model to analyze the allocation of (endogenous) risk and ecosystem quality by risk averse ecosystem managers who have access to financial insurance, and study the implications for individually and socially optimal ecosystem management, and policy design. We show that while an improved access to financial insurance leads to lower ecosystem quality, the effect on the free-rider problem and on welfare is determined by ecosystem properties. We derive conditions on ecosystem functioning under which, if financial insurance becomes more accessible, (i) the extent of optimal regulation increases or decreases; and (ii) welfare, in the absence of environmental regulation, increases or decreases.

Vor dem Hintergrund der 2004 durchgeführten Reform auf dem Handwerksmarkt sollte anhand einer theoretisch-empirischen Analyse überprüft werden, ob Informationsasymmetrien bezüglich der Qualität auf dem Handwerksmarkt in unterschiedlicher Stärke auftreten und dementsprechend auch eine differenzierte Regulierung erfordern sowie inwieweit marktendogene und wirtschaftspolitische Lösungsmöglichkeiten zum Abbau von Informationsasymmetrien auf dem deutschen Handwerksmarkt wirken. Als empirische Datengrundlage wurde dazu eine Haushaltsumfrage durchgeführt, die neben der Ermittlung des Informationsnachfrageverhaltens auch die Beurteilung handwerklicher Qualität durch private Bauherren zum Ziel hatte. Die Befragung zeigt, dass trotz des Meisterbriefes Informationsasymmetrien auf den einzelnen Märkten bestehen, so dass eine über alle Gewerke geltende und den Wettbewerb stark einschränkende Regulierung in Frage gestellt werden muss. Die aus den Ergebnissen der Befragung deutlich gewordene Anwendung marktendogener Reputationsmechanismen zur Lösung von Informationsasymmetrien macht gleichzeitig den Schutz der Konsumenten als Regulierungsbegründung fraglich. Dies wird verstärkt durch die in der Befragung deutlich gewordene hohe Nutzung spezialisierter Dritter, die aufgrund ihrer Fachkenntnis keinen expliziten Verbraucherschutz benötigen sollten. Die Handwerksnovelle 2004 stellt somit insbesondere durch die Auflockerung der Marktzutrittsbeschränkungen aus informationsökonomischer Sicht einen Schritt in die richtige Richtung dar.

Der Begriff Blockchain tritt zum ersten Mal in Verbindung mit der Kryptowährung Bitcoin im 21. Jahrhundert auf. Bitcoin basiert auf einer dezentralen Open Source Software, welche Ende 2008 erstmals vorgestellt und kurz danach gestartet wurde. Das anfänglich beschriebene Protokoll von Bitcoin hat sich mittlerweile zu einem Phänomen entwickelt, dass unter dem Begriff Kryptoökonomie zusammengefasst wird. Es ist ein Phänomen, dass eine Revolution in vielen Bereichen der Wirtschaftssysteme hervorrufen wird.Im Zentrum stehen dabei dezentrale und fälschungssichere Datenbanken, dessen Wertschöpfung auf kryptografischen Algorithmen basieren. Mittlerweile ist Bitcoin nicht mehr die einzige Kryptowährung, denn innerhalb der letzten sieben Jahre hat sich ein großes, vielseitiges Universum von Kryptowährungs- und Kryptotransaktionssystemen entwickelt. Am 11.10.2016 sind auf der Webseite coinmarketcap.com 711 verschiedene Kryptowährungen eingetragen, die einen Wechselkurs besitzen. Es kann davon auszugehen sein, dass noch eine Vielzahl weiterer Kryptowährungen existieren, welche keinen Wechselkurs ausweisen, unter privater Nutzung stehen oder sich noch in Entwicklung befinden. All diese Entwicklungen werden durch die Blockchain vereint. Auch Swan sieht in der Blockchain die größte technologische Innovation von Bitcoin. Sie vergleicht dabei die Blockchain-Technologie mit dem revolutionären Potential des Internets und ordnet Blockchain nach der mobilen und sozialen Vernetzung als fünftes,disruptives Computerparadigma ein. Sie untergliedert die zahlreichen Systeme in Bezug auf die Blockchain in drei Kategorien.

Western organizations increasingly organize work in team-based structures. Members of these teams often differ in various diversity attributes (e. g., gender, age, cultural background). In response, research aims to provide evidence-based recommendations on how to effectively manage diversity in teams. Within diversity research, the diversity faultlines approach has been particularly fruitful. It considers the impact of the alignment of multiple diversity attributes in teams. Strong diversity faultlines are associated with the emergence of relatively homogeneous subgroups in teams and have an overall negative impact on team processes and outcomes. This dissertation investigates factors that mitigate the detrimental consequences of strong diversity faultlines in teams, namely pro-diversity beliefs. It extends faultline literature beyond the conventional focus on processes and outcomes related to team members by emphasizing the leaders´ perspective. The three empirical papers included in this dissertation systematically examine how strong pro-diversity beliefs can help unleashing the positive effects of team diversity despite strong faultlines. The first paper highlights the role of leaders´ pro-diversity beliefs in mitigating the negative impact of diversity faultlines on two team processes: perceived cohesion and social loafing. Moreover, it compares the impact of socio-demographic faultlines (based on gender and age) and experience-based faultlines (based on team tenure and education level). Data was collected in a multisource field sample with 217 team members nested in 44 teams and the corresponding leaders. We found that socio-demographic, but not experience-based faultlines were negatively related to perceived cohesion and positively to perceived loafing. Path analysis further revealed that these relationships were mitigated when leaders held strong pro-diversity beliefs. The second paper extends these findings by additionally taking the impact of members´ pro-diversity beliefs into account. It examines whether the impact of sociodemographic faultlines on performance is contingent on leaders´ and members´ pro-diversity beliefs. Moreover, we assumed that aggregate LMX would mediate this relationship. In a multisource data set obtained from 41 teams with 219 members and the corresponding leaders working for the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs, we found partial support for our hypotheses. As expected, the impact of strong socio-demographic faultlines on diplomats´ performance was least negative when both leaders and members held strong pro-diversity beliefs. However, neither the two-way interactions of faultlines and leaders´ or members´ prodiversity beliefs nor aggregate LMX had a significant impact in our research model. The third paper zooms into processes and outcomes related to team leaders. It investigates how leaders´ pro-diversity beliefs and their perceptions of members´ prodiversity beliefs in teams with strong socio-demographic faultlines impact leaders´ task role assignment, performance expectation, and motivation. To test our hypotheses, we conducted two experimental studies with students, one in Germany (N = 55) and one in the US (N = 134). Findings showed that strong pro-diversity beliefs held and perceived by leaders made them assign task roles that cross-cut rather than aligned with the subgroup structure created by faultlines. Moreover, leaders´ perceptions of members´ pro-diversity beliefs, but not their own beliefs, had a positive impact on their motivation, mediated by their performance expectation. In sum, findings of these three papers extend the literature on diversity faultlines and leadership by systematically demonstrating the mitigating impact of pro-diversity beliefs on faultlines´ detrimental consequences on processes and outcomes related to team leaders and members. Based on various samples, we showed that it is worthwhile to distinguish between pro-diversity beliefs held by leaders, pro-diversity beliefs held by members, and leaders´ perceptions of members´ pro-diversity beliefs. Fostering strong pro-diversity beliefs among leaders and members should thus be a crucial element of effective diversity faultline management in organizations.

In this dissertation the relation between time headway in car following and the subjective experience of a driver was researched. Three experiments were conducted in a driving simulator. Time headways in a range of 0.5 to 4.0 seconds were investigated at 50km/h, 100km/h, and 150km/h under varied visibility conditions and at differing levels of driver control over the car. The main research questions addressed the possible existence of a threshold effect for the subjective experience of time headways and the influence of vehicle speed, forward visibility, and vehicle control on the position of time headway thresholds. Furthermore, the validity of zero-risk driver behavior models was investigated. Results suggest that a threshold exists for the subjective experience of time headways in car following. This implies that the subjective experience of time headways stays constant for a range of time headways above a critical threshold. The subjective experience of a driver is only influenced by time headway once this critical time headway threshold is passed. Speed does not influence preferred time headway distances in self- and assisted-driving, i.e. time headway thresholds are constant for different speeds. However, in completely automated driving preferred time headways are influenced by vehicle speed. For higher speeds preferred time headways decrease. A reduction of forward visibility leads to a shift in preferred time headways towards larger time headways. Results of this dissertation give credence to zero-risk models of driver behavior.