Filtern
Sprache
- Englisch (7) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- insurance (4)
- Versicherung (3)
- ecosystem services (3)
- Ökosystem (3)
- Biodiversität (2)
- Haftpflichtrisiko (2)
- Umweltökonomie (2)
- agro-biodiversity (2)
- ecosystem management (2)
- risk-aversion (2)
- Agrarplanung (1)
- Agrarökosystem (1)
- Biologische Landwirtschaft (1)
- Biologischer Landbau (1)
- Emission (1)
- Interdisziplinarität (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Risikoausschluss (1)
- Transdisziplinarität (1)
- Umweltpolitik (1)
- Unsicherheit (1)
- Wertpapieremission (1)
- Wissenschaftsphilosophie (1)
- agri-environmental policy (1)
- agro-ecosystem management (1)
- biodiversity (1)
- dynamic economy-environment interaction (1)
- ecological economics (1)
- ecological-economic systems (1)
- ecosystem quality (1)
- endogenous environmental risk (1)
- free-riding (1)
- interdisciplinarity (1)
- multi-pollutant emissions (1)
- non-monotonic control (1)
- optimal scale (1)
- philosophy of science (1)
- public good (1)
- stock pollution (1)
- sustainability (1)
- transdisciplinarity (1)
- uncertainty (1)
- viability (1)
- Öffentliches Gut (1)
- Ökologie (1)
- Ökonomie <Begriff> (1)
Institut
We analyze the optimal dynamic scale and structure of a two-sectoreconomy, where each sector produces one consumption good and one specific pollutant. Both pollutants accumulate at di_erent rates to stocks which damage the natural environment. This acts as a dynamic driving force for the economy. Our analysis shows that along the optimal time-path (i) the overall scale of economic activity may be less than maximal; (ii) the time scale of economic dynamics (change of scale and structure) is mainly determined by the lifetime of pollutants, their harmfulness and the discount rate; and (iii) the optimal control of economic scale and structure may be non-monotonic. These results raise important questions about the optimal design of environmental policies.
In the face of uncertainty, ecosystems can provide natural insurance to risk averse users of ecosystem services. We employ a conceptual ecological-economic model to analyze the allocation of (endogenous) risk and ecosystem quality by risk averse ecosystem managers who have access to financial insurance, and study the implications for individually and socially optimal ecosystem management, and policy design. We show that while an improved access to financial insurance leads to lower ecosystem quality, the effect on the free-rider problem and on welfare is determined by ecosystem properties. We derive conditions on ecosystem functioning under which, if financial insurance becomes more accessible, (i) the extent of optimal regulation increases or decreases; and (ii) welfare, in the absence of environmental regulation, increases or decreases.
Abstract. The ecological literature suggests that biodiversity reduces the variance of ecosystem services. Thus, conservative biodiversity management has an insurance value to risk-averse users of ecosystem services. We analyze a conceptual ecological-economic model in which such management measures generate a private benefit and, via ecosystem processes at higher hierarchical levels, a positive externality on other ecosystem users. We find that ecosystem management and environmental policy depend on the extent of uncertainty and risk-aversion as follows: (i) Individual effort to improve ecosystem quality unambiguously increases. The free-rider problem may decrease or increase, depending on the characteristics of the ecosystem and its management; in particular, (ii) the size of the externality may decrease or increase, depending on how individual and aggregate management effort influence biodiversity; and (iii) the welfare loss due to free-riding may decrease or increase, depending on how biodiversity influences ecosystem service provision.