Filtern
Sprache
- Englisch (1) (entfernen)
Companies increasingly use social and environmental accounting and reporting (SEAR) to measure, manage, and report their influence on ecological and social issues, i.e., climate change and human rights violations. One reason for the increased use of SEAR is that companies aim to support sustainable aspects in their business decision-making.
Nowadays, there are many different tools, frameworks, and standards for SEAR that companies can use. Beyond the content presented in the tool itself, e.g., social and/or ecological information, these tools differ, among others, by the language used and the type of data collected (e.g., qualitative, quantitative, or monetary data). One the one hand, the range of different approaches for SEAR allows industry- and company-specific monitoring and reporting of sustainable issues. On the other hand, this variety as well as the lack of a common reference framework can lead to uncertainty of corporate decision-makers and stakeholders regarding the use and comparability of these approaches. While numerous previous scholars present advantages and opportunities of the use of SEAR for companies and society, there is a rising number of scholars criticizing the way (social and environmental) accounting and reporting is used today and its impact on a company’s environmental orientation and decision-making. Further, there is only limited literature on the question of which approach to use and how to use and introduce the particular approach for supporting sustainable decision-making within companies.
This dissertation aims to expand previous literature by clarifying the effects of SEAR on corporate decision-making and its influencing factors. Additionally, antecedents for implementation and use of SEAR in regard to supporting sustainability decision-making are discussed. For this purpose, the given dissertation investigates public sustainability reports by companies with different environmental orientation, conducts two survey-based case studies on the effects of different types of SEAR and one qualitative case study on the antecedents of institutionalizing management accounting change through SEAR.
The results lead to seven criteria that practitioners and researchers should recognize for supporting successful SEAR regarding a company’s environmental orientation, the role of employees and leadership as well as the specific SEAR tool itself. Additionally, this dissertation leads to several contributions to the scientific discussion and its influences on corporate environmental orientation and decision-making.