Open Access

Both sustainability and transdisciplinary research can change academic research, especially with regard to its relevance for, and relationship with, its environments. Transdisciplinary sustainability research (TSR), thus, offers the opportunity to change non-sustainable development paths of sciences themselves. In order to fully exploit this possibility, this PhD project addresses the question of how TSR, in the first place, does conceptualize and, in the second place, could conceptualize knowledge, research, and science. Firstly, this PhD project analyzes, from a discourse studies perspective, the term problem in TSR, against the background of discourses on sustainable development. Secondly, it explores the historicalanalytical and transformative concept of the problematic. The results, firstly, show the consequences of a problem-solving focus for TSR, and secondly, differentiate it from a transformative direction of problematic designing, as a more appropriate view on the dimensions of transformation and their qualities of change that matter for TSR. This PhD project aims to contribute to a self-understanding of, and a philosophical communication about, TSR, as a research form in the sustainability sciences. Keywords: Discourse studies, problem-solving, transdisciplinary sustainability research, transformative potential, dimensions of transformation.

The world currently faces important issues concerning climate change and environmental sustainability, with the wellbeing of billions of people around the world at risk over the next decades. Existing institutions no longer appear to be sufficiently capable to deal with the complexity and uncertainty associated with the wicked problem of sustainability. Achieving the required sustainability transformation will thus require purposeful reform of existing institutional frameworks. However, existing research on the governance of sustainability of sustainability transformations has strongly focused on innovation and the more ‘creative’ aspects of these processes, blinding our view to the fact that they go hand with the failure, decline or dismantling of institutions that are no longer considered functional or desirable. This doctoral dissertation thus seeks to better understand how institutional failure and decline can contribute productively to sustainability transformations and how such dynamics in institutional arrangements can serve to restructure existing institutional systems. A systematic review of the conceptual literature served to provide a concise synthesis of the research on ‘failure’ and ‘decline’ in the institutional literature, providing important first insights into their potentially productive functions. This was followed up by an archetype analysis of the productive functions of failure and decline, drawing on a wide range of literatures. This research identified five archetypical pathways: (1) crises triggering institutional adaptations toward sustainability, (2) systematic learning from failure and breakdown, (3) the purposeful destabilisation of unsustainable institutions, (4) making a virtue of inevitable decline, and (5) active and reflective decision making in the face of decline instead of leaving it to chance. Empirical case studies looking at the German energy transition and efforts to phase out coal in the Powering Past Coal Alliance served to provide more insights on (a) how to effectively harness ‘windows of opportunity’ for change, and (b) the governance mechanisms used by governments to actively remove institutions. Results indicate that the lock-in of existing technologies, regulations and practices can throw up important obstacles for sustainability transformations. The intentional or unintentional destabilisation of the status quo may thus be required to enable healthy renewal within a system. This process required active and reflective management to avoid the irreversible loss of desirable institutional elements. Instruments such as ‘sunset clauses’ and ‘experimental legislation’ may serve as important tools to learn through ‘trial and error’, whilst limiting the possible damage done by failure. Focusing on the subject of scale, this analysis finds that the level at which failure occurs is likely to determine the degree of change that can be achieved. Failures at the policy-level are most likely to merely lead to changes to the tools and instruments used by policy makers. This research thus suggests that failures on the polity- and political level may be required to achieve transformative changes to existing power structures, belief-systems and paradigms. Finally, this research briefly touches on the role of actor and agency in the governance of sustainabilitytransformations through failure and decline. It finds that actors may play an important role in causing a system or one of its elements to fail and in shaping the way events are come to be perceived. Drawing on the findings of this research, this dissertation suggests a number of lessons policy makers and others seeking to revisit existing institutional arrangements may want to take into account. Actors should be prepared to harness the potential associated with failure and decline, preserve those institutional elements considered important, and take care to manage the tension between the need for ‘quick fixes’ to currently pressing problems and solution that maintain and protect the longterm sustainability of a system.

In response to the challenges of the energy transition, the German electricity network is subjected to a process of substantial transformation. Considering the long latency periods and lifetimes of electricity grid infrastructure projects, it is more cost-efficient to combine this need for transformation with the need to adapt the grid to future climate conditions. This study proposes the spatially varying risk of electricity grid outages as a guiding principle to determine optimal levels of security of electricity supply. Therefore, not only projections of future changes in the likelihood of impacts on the grid infrastructure were analyzed, but also the monetary consequences of an interruption. Since the windthrow of trees was identified a major source for atmospherically induced grid outages, a windthrow index was developed, to regionally assess the climatic conditions for windthrow. Further, a concept referred to as Value of Lost Grid was proposed to quantify the impacts related to interruptions of the distribution grid. In combination, the two approaches enabled to identify grid entities, which are of comparably high economic value and subjected to a comparably high likelihood of windthrow under future climate conditions. These are primarily located in the mid-range mountain areas of North-Rhine Westphalia, Baden-Württemberg and Bavaria. In comparison to other areas of less risk, the higher risk in these areas should be reflected in comparably more resilient network structures, such as buried lines instead of overheadlines, or more comprehensive efforts to prevent grid interruptions, such as structural reinforcements of pylons or improved vegetation management along the power lines. In addition, the outcomes provide the basis for a selection of regions which should be subjected to a more regionally focused analysis inquiring spatial differences (with respect to the identified coincidence of high windthrow likelihoods and high economic importance of the grid) among individual power lines or sections of a distribution network.

The image of the solitary scientist is receding. Increasingly, researchers are expected to work in collaborative interdisciplinary teams to tackle more complex and interrelated problems. However, the prospect of collaborating with others, from different disciplines, exerts countervailing forces on researchers. There is the lure of transcending the limitations of one’s own knowledge, methods and conventions, belonging to diverse intellectual communities and tackling, together, ambitious research topics. On the other hand, there is the risk that collaborating across disciplinary boundaries will be taxing, confounding at times, with no guarantee of success. In short, interdisciplinary collaboration is both a desirable and difficult way to conduct research. This thesis is about collaborative interdisciplinary research from the perspective of a formative accompanying researcher. I accompanied an interdisciplinary research team in the field of sustainability over three years for the duration of a collaborative project. Formative accompanying research (FAR) is an approach to ‘research into research’ that learns about, with and for a collaborative interdisciplinary team. I found – through immersion in the literature, my own daily experiences of collaborating, and my observations – that interdisciplinary collaboration is very difficult. It requires a basic understanding and appreciation of other disciplines and methods, as well as the skills to integrate research inquiries and findings across diverse epistemologies. It also requires awareness that collaborative interdisciplinary research is more than an intellectual task of knowledge creation. Other factors matter, such as interpersonal relationships, power differentials, different research tempos and a sense of belonging. And these factors have an impact on processes and outcomes of collaborative knowledge creation. Knowing this implies a willingness to keep learning and to tolerate discomfort so as to cultivate deeper levels of collaborative capacity. I discovered that in these deeper levels lie skills for staying with inevitable tensions, for talking and listening to generate new understanding together, and for applying a researcher’s frank curiosity to oneself too. A formative accompanying researcher, who is part of the team she is researching, has to navigate delicate terrain. In this thesis, I develop a FAR methodology that takes seriously the questions of positionality and relationality, and reflect on the experiences of putting these into practice. A FAR practice involves remaining in dynamic movement between observing and participating, between exercising curiosity and care, and between the researchers’ own sense of impartiality and investment in relation to the issues at hand. There is merit in furthering the methodology and practice of FAR on its own terms. This includes attending to the skills required by a formative accompanying researcher to remain oriented within the concentric circles of research, relationship and loyalty that make up a collaborative team. There is also the question of how FAR, and other forms of research into research, can help to advance collaborative interdisciplinary research. I argue for creating the conditions in research teams that would enable treating collaboration as a capacity to develop, and that would facilitate team members’ receptivity to learning with FAR. Furthermore, I explore dilemmas of intervening as a formative accompanying researcher and of sustaining dynamic positionality over the long-term. In the field of sustainability research, and in multiple other research fields, the future is a collaborative one. This thesis is concerned with how to collaborate so that the experience and the outcomes lend themselves to what Rabinow terms a “flourishing existence”.

In recent years, especially since 2015, Germany and other European countries have accepted high numbers of refugees. The social and vocational integration of these refugees and of those yet to come represents a challenge. (Social) entrepreneurship is one means to achieve this goal, to fully tap into the potential of refugees and to give them a chance to make a living in host countries. This dissertation examines the potential of vocational integration of refugees through (social) entrepreneurial activities. It includes a detailed literature review and suggests possible direction in the emerging field of refugee (social) entrepreneurship. This dissertation shows that to foster refugee (social) entrepreneurship, the identification and evaluation of specific and potential needs for support is essential. Incubators in particular have a high potential for supporting refugee entrepreneurs, in part it is possible for them to address some of the challenges faced by this target group, which differ from those of locals or migrant entrepreneurs. More specifically, this dissertation aims to answer two research questions: (1) What are relevant (social) entrepreneurial concepts that can contribute to the vocational integration of refugees? (2) What are the distinct contributions of and challenges faced by refugees when it comes to their vocational integration through (social) entrepreneurial activities? Analyzing select practical cases, this dissertation has several important implications for researchers who seek to bridge the gap between academia and society in the context of refugee entrepreneurship and refugee social entrepreneurship research. The findings presented here are also relevant for practitioners, for example those working at business incubators, who aim to facilitate the vocational and social integration of refugees in general and refugees with entrepreneurial aspirations in particular.

This dissertation examines how smallholder farming livelihoods may be more effectively leveraged to address food security. It is based on empirical research in three woredas (districts) in the Jimma Zone of southwestern Ethiopia. Findings in the chapters that follow draw on quantitative and qualitative data. In this research, I focus on local actors to investigate how they can be better supported in their roles as agents who have the ability to improve their livelihoods and achieve food security. This general aim is operationalized through three research questions that are addressed in separate chapters. The research questions are: (i) How do livelihood strategies influence food security?; (ii) What livelihood challenges are common and how do households cope with these?; and (iii) How do social institutions, in which livelihoods are embedded, influence people’s abilities to undertake livelihoods and be food secure? Using quantitative data from a survey of randomly selected households, I applied a number of multivariate statistical analysis to determine types of livelihood strategies and to establish how these strategies are associated with capital assets and food security. Here I view livelihood strategies as a portfolio of livelihood activities that households undertake to make a living. The predominant livelihood in the study area was diversified smallholder farming involving mainly the production of crops. Food crops such as maize, teff, sorghum, and in smaller quantities – barley and wheat, were primarily produced for subsistence. Cash crops namely coffee and khat were primarily produced for the market. Based on our analyses, we found five types of livelihood strategies to be present along a gradient of crop diversity. Food security generally decreased with less crops being part of the livelihood strategy. The livelihood strategies were associated with households’ capital assets. For example, the livelihood strategy with the most number of crops had more access to a wider range of capital assets. They had larger aggregate farm field size, and were more involved in learning with other farmers through informal exchange of information and knowledge. The status of food (in)security of each household during the lean season was measured using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS). A generalized linear model established that the type of livelihood strategy a household undertook significantly influenced their food security. Other significant variables were educational attainment and gender of household head. The findings contribute evidence to the benefits of diversified livelihoods for food security, in this case, the combination of diverse food crops and cash crops. Smallholder farming in southwest Ethiopia is beset with process-related and outcome-related challenges. Here, a process-related challenge pertains to the lack of different types of capital assets that people need to be able to undertake their livelihoods, while an outcome-related challenge pertains to lack of food. The most frequently mentioned process-related challenges were associated with the natural capital either as lack in necessary ecosystem services or high levels of ecosystem disservices. Farming households typically faced the combined challenges of decreasing soil fertility, land scarcity, die-off of oxen due to diseases, and wild animal pests that raided their crops and attacked their livestock. Lack of cash was also common and this was associated with an inability to access goods and services that households needed to address other problems. For example, lack of cash prevented households from buying fertilizers or replacing the oxen they lost to diseases. Confronted with multiple and simultaneous challenges, households coped by drawing on more readily accessible capital assets in order to address a lack. This process is here referred to as capital asset substitution. The findings indicate that when households liquidate a physical asset in order to gain cash which they then use to address other challenges, the common outcome is an erosion of their capital asset base. Many households reported having to sell their livestock to buy fertilizers, as required by the government, without seeing an increase in their harvest. The same process of liquidating capital asset to purchase food particularly during the lean season, also led to erosion of capital assets. On the other hand, when households drew on their social capital to address the challenges, they tended to maintain their capital asset base. The local didaro system is one such example in which farming households with adjacent farm fields synchronize their cropping timing and pool their labor together to address the problem of wild animal pests. Human capital, for example, in the form of available labor was also important for coping. Protecting and enhancing natural capital is needed to strengthen the basis of livelihoods in the study area, and maintaining social and human capitals is important to enable farming households to cope with challenges without eroding their capital asset base. Smallholder farming in southwest Ethiopia is embedded in a social context that creates differentiated challenges and opportunities amongst people. Gender is an axis of social differentiation on which many of the differences are based. Since the coming into power of the currently ruling Ethiopian political coalition, important policy reforms have been put in place to empower women. This includes the formal requirement that wives’ names are included in land certificates. Local residents reported notable changes related to gender in the last ten years. To make sense of the changes, we adapted the leverage points concept which identifies places to intervene in a system with different depths and effectiveness for changing the trajectory of a system. Using this concept, we classified the reported changes as belonging to the domains of visible gaps, social structures, and attitudes. Importantly, changes within these domains interacted, suggesting that changes facilitate further changes. The most prominent driver of the changes observed was the government’s emphasis on empowering women and government-organized interventions including gender sensitization trainings. The changes toward more egalitarian relationships at the household level were perceived by local residents to lead to better implementation of livelihoods, and better ability to be food secure. The study offers the insight that while changing deep, underlying drivers (e. g. attitudes) of systemic inequalities is critical, other leverage points such as formal institutional change and closing of certain visible gaps can facilitate deeper changes (e. g. attitudes) through interaction between different leverage points. This can inform gender transformative approaches. While positive gender-related changes have been observed, highly unequal gender norms still persist that lead to women as well as poor men being disadvantaged. Social norms which provide the basis for collective understanding of acceptable attitudes and behaviors are entrenched in people’s ways of being and doing and can therefore significantly lag behind formal institutional changes. For instance, daughters in southwest Ethiopia continued to be excluded from land inheritance because of long-standing patrilineal inheritance practices. This impacted on women’s abilities to engage in smallholder farming in equal footing as men. Norms influenced practices around access and control of capital assets, decision-making, and allocation of activities with important implications for who gets to participate, how, and who gets to benefit. Landless men also faced distinct disadvantages in sharecropping arrangements where people involved often have unequal socioeconomic status. Processes that facilitate critical local reflections are needed to begin to change unequal social norms and transform smallholder farming to becoming more inclusive and egalitarian spheres. To more effectively leverage smallholder farming for a food secure future, this dissertation closes with four key insights namely: (1) Diversified livelihoods combining food and cash crops result in better food security; (2) Enhancing natural and social capital is a requisite for viable smallholder farming; (3) Social and gender equality are strategically important in improving livelihoods and food security; and (4) Institutions particularly social norms are key to achieving gender and social equality. Because the livelihoods-food security nexus depend on people’s agency in their livelihoods, this dissertation concludes that livelihoods should be recast as critical spheres for expanding human agency and that conceptual development as well as formulation of suitable tools of measurement be pursued.

The German energy system is under transformation. The so-called Energiewende (in English, Energy turn) relies, among other things, on renewable energies for building a more sustainable energy system. Regions (Landkreise) are one relevant level where different administrative bodies make decisions and plans both for the implementation and for the use of renewable energies. However, in order to realize the goals of the Energiewende, developments in the wider society are necessary. This is why, scientific research can and should foster such developments with more research on the social aspects of energy-related topics. The present work contributes to the understanding of transition processes towards a sustainable use of regional renewable energy by focusing on the role of contextual conditions, practical experiences, and temporal dynamics in the implementation and use of renewable energy in German regions. In this way, this work wants to contribute fostering the development of regional energy transition strategies for the realization of the Energiewende. The conceptual background for this piece of transformation research lies in three bodies of literature dealing respectively with transitions of socio-technical systems, transformations of socioecological systems, and time ecology. From a critical engagement with this literature, three main results have emerged. First, an evidence-based, spatially distinct analysis of contextual conditions for the use of renewable energy in all German regions has resulted in the identification of nine types of regions, so-called energy context types. Second, empirical research on practices in regional settings learned from the knowhow of actors from regional administration has shown that political and economic conditions are crucial as well as that process management, exchange, and learning are helpful for renewable energy implementation. Third, conceptual work about a deeper understanding of the temporal dimensions of transformation processes has made it possible to point out a three-step approach to include temporal dynamics into sustainability transformations management - the time-in-transformations-approach. The literature suggests that regions need to be treated individually; but developing an energy transition strategy for each region individually would be extremely resource intensive. Overall, my work outlines a compromise for a more efficient approach towards regional energy transition strategies which still considers the individuality of regions. As a result, I suggest to develop generic regional energy transition strategies that are adapted to each of the nine energy context types of German regions, that include the experiences of practitioners, and that consider temporal dynamics of transformation processes. Transdisciplinary research is a promising approach to meet many of the challenges for the realization of the Energiewende. A transdisciplinary steering board on the national level could create generic regional energy transition strategies that guide the energy transition and give clear goals and orientation for the realization of policies on the lower levels. On the regional level, these strategies would need to be adapted with regard to each region´s situation. Relying on the results of my research, I conclude that this could also be informed through transdisciplinary processes.

The dissertation project focuses on empirically investigating consumers´ attitudes, motiva-tions and purchasing decisions regarding sustainable products. The focus on this micro per-spective, however, does not reflect consumers´ roles within the transformation towards sus-tainable consumption. Therefore, the present framework paper puts the included papers into a greater context and evaluates the findings on a meta-level by applying an enhanced transition management theory. The analysis underlines that consumers´ limited personal capabilities are an underlying reason for unsustainable practices. Therefore, the active engagement not only of consumers, but also of companies is required if the transformation is to be successful. If companies actively support consumers in making sustainable choices, consumers can engage in sustainable consumption with only low cognitive efforts. On this basis, genuine sustainable choices are enabled. The dissertation provides practical implications by highlighting potential measures which will help to promote sustainable products from niches to mainstream. In sum, the dissertation project enhances academic understanding of consumers´ sustainable purchas-ing behavior and reveals the potential of integrating such insights into the management of transformations towards sustainable consumption.

Water is an essential natural resource, yet we are experiencing a global water crisis. This crisis is first and foremost a crisis of governance rather than of actual physical resources. Capacities of single, unitary states are severely challenged by the complex, multi-scalar, and dynamic structure of contemporary problems in water resource management. New modes of governance stress the potential of public participation and scalar restructuring for effective and legitimate environmental decision-making. However, a lack evidence on the actual implementation and instrumental value of novel governance modes stands in stark contrast to the strong beliefs and assumptions that often see these being propagated as ´panaceas´ or ´universal remedies´. With this doctoral dissertation I aim to contribute to a deeper understanding of the implementation and performance of public participation and scalar restructuring in environmental governance, and particularly to engage in systematic research into the contextual factors that shape the performance of such governance innovations. Based on the conceptual approaches of participatory, multi-level governance and scale, I advance a conceptual framework specifying mechanisms and important contextual factors describing the potential of participation and rescaling to impact on the efficacy of environmental decision-making. Applying this framework, I employ a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative, quantitative, set-theoretic, and review methods, with the aim of maximising the validity of results. Drawing on the institutional frame of the European Water Framework Directive (WFD), I first assess the extent and conditions under which participation and rescaling are actually implemented in the European water resource management regime. Subsequent analyses examine whether these governance shifts, where implemented, actually lead to environmentally effective and legitimate political decisions, and foster social outcomes. Results indicate that actual changes in governance structures remain modest, whereas previous institutional structures and experiences prove rather durable. Hence, despite recent shifts distributing authority towards alternative actors and scales, the state has persisted in its role as central authority in the European water resource management regime. To the extent that they were implemented, public participation and rescaling were generally positively related with the environmental effectiveness and legitimacy of political outcomes. The analysis provides a context-sensitive understanding, by unravelling the supposedly linear relationship between governance inputs and outputs to develop a more nuanced picture of the governance process rather as a composition of multiple, interdependent causal mechanisms that, depending on their actual configuration, lead to various outcomes. In this way, particularly the tension between legitimacy and effectiveness of political outcomes is disentangled, with both being seen as the result of distinct but interrelated properties of the governance system and its contextual circumstances. The thesis furthermore provides insights of practical and policy relevance, highlighting the need and potential to take a context-sensitive perspective in policy design and decision-making. The framework paper and the Ph.D. thesis thus together enhance academic understanding of environmental governance and its potential contributions to sustainability transitions.

Agricultural production of smallholder farmers in Myanmar is facing soil fertility degradation and in consequence, crop yields decline due to the imbalances of nutrient supply. In most cases, all above ground biomass is removed from the fields after harvesting the crops and during land preparation for the next crop. Higher temperatures also stimulate the higher mineralisation rates and released mineral nutrients are lost from fallow lands before sowing the next crops. Regarding the addition of mineral fertilizers, except for cash crops, farmers are reluctant to apply fertilizers for the crops that are sown for household’s self-sufficiency. In the Dry Zone, irrigated agriculture is available in recent years and farmers could overcome water scarcity through irrigation. With the availability of irrigation water, farmers could prolong the cropping period, nevertheless crop yields are decreasing year by year. In recent decades, research findings are indicating the benefits of biochar application for soil fertility improvement and food security. Smallholder farmers can produce biochar from agricultural by-products such as pigeon pea stems, cotton stems and rice husks by using biochar stoves. Large-scale production is possible by producing both biochar and thermal energy simultaneously, such as getting rice husk biochar and producing thermal energy by burning rice husks. By those means, environmental pollution due to the smokes from stubble burnings and the health hazards from smokes arise from kitchens can also be reduced. Present research was conducted to test the effects of the application of biochars produced from different crop residues together with NPK fertilizers on crop yields and soil properties in the rice-chickpea-cotton cropping system of the Central Dry Zone area of Myanmar during 2012 and 2013 cropping seasons at Shwe Daung Farm, Mandalay Division, Myanmar. Effects of biochar applications in combination with NPK fertilizers were compared with NPK fertilizer (without biochar) application and the control (without biochar and NPK fertilizers). Biochars used in the experiments were produced from three kinds of locally available raw materials (rice husk, rice straw and, pigeon pea stem) at temperature above 550°C by using a kiln made from a 200-Liter diesel barrel. Field experiments were conducted on sandy loam soil in the Central Dry Zone of Myanmar. After harvesting rice in 2012, chickpea was sown without application of both organic and inorganic fertilizers. After harvesting chickpea in 2013, cotton was sown on the same experimental plots. Treatments were rice husk biochar (Rh) 20 Mg ha-1 + NPK fertilizers; rice straw biochar (Rs) 20 Mg ha-1 + NPK fertilizers; pigeon pea stem biochar (Ps) 20 Mg ha-1 + NPK fertilizers; rice husk biochar and farmyard manure mixture (Rh biochar + FYM) 10 Mg ha-1 + NPK fertilizers; NPK fertilizers (without biochar); and the control (without fertilizer and biochar). Biochar weights represented fresh biochar weights. Equal rate of NPK fertilizers were applied in all treatments. However, fertilizer rates were different with respect to the crops. In rice experiment, 100:50:50 kg ha-1 rate of Urea (N): Triple Super Phosphate (P): Muriate of potash (K) was applied. In cotton experiment, 100:30:117 kg ha-1 rate of Urea (N): Triple Super Phosphate (P): Muriate of potash (K) was applied. Crop growth data, yield component data and yield data of each treatment were recorded. Soil samples from topsoil (0-0.2 m) were taken before starting the experiments, after harvesting rice and cotton, respectively, and analysed. A biogeochemical model, denitrification decomposition (DNDC) model, was used to estimate soil organic carbon storage and greenhouse gas emissions during crop growing seasons and to quantify the long-term impact of biochar applications on rice, chickpea and cotton yields.The results from soil analyses indicated that although initial soil pH was at 8.0 and pH values of biochars ranged between 8.0 and 10.0 soil pH after two years of biochar application did not increase. pH values were below 8.0. That value was lower than initial soil pH. That could be due to the effect of the change of cropping system from upland to lowland rice cultivation and the effects of biochar additions to the alkaline sandy loamy soil of the experimental site. Although total exchangeable cation value was not significantly different among the treatments, compositions of major cations were significantly different among the treatments. Exchangeable potassium increased in Rs biochar + NPK applied soils. Exchangeable sodium increased in control, and conventional NPK fertilizer applied soils. Reduction of soil bulk density from 1.8 g cm-3 to 1.6-1.7 g cm-3 occurred in biochar treatments compared to control and conventional NPK fertilizer application treatments. Positive changes of total carbon and total nitrogen of soils were found in biochar treatments compared to control and conventional NPK fertilizer application. Application of pigeon pea stem biochar + NPK fertilizers showed the highest crop growth and the highest yield in rice. The highest chickpea yield was obtained from the plot that applied rice husk biochar + NPK fertilizers. Cotton crop growth and yield was the highest in rice husk biochar and farmyard manure mixture + NPK fertilizer application. The lowest crop growth and yield was obtained from the control in cotton. The results of this study suggested that biochars from different biomass materials had different effects on soil properties and crop yields under different growing conditions and cultivated crops. Although the applied biochars had a high pH, soil pH did not increase after biochar applications. The growth and yield of tested crops were higher than that of the control and conventional NPK fertilizer application. Rice husk biochar and farmyard manure mixture + NPK fertilizer application can be assumed as a suitable soil amendment application under upland crop cultivation. Pigeon pea stems biochar + NPK fertilizers should be applied in rice cultivation. Rice husk biochar + NPK fertilizers and rice husk biochar-farmyard manure mixture + NPK fertilizers showed as the appropriate biochar soil amendments for the study area compared to rice straw biochar + NPK fertilizers and pigeon pea stem biochar + NPK fertilizers. Application of these biochars increased total exchangeable cations, reduced bulk density, increased organic carbon, regulated soil pH and, can easily be accessed by smallholder farmers by promising crop yields for sustainable agricultural production. Rice straw biochar + NPK fertilizers and pigeon pea stem biochar + NPK fertilizers also showed positive influences on soil fertility and crop growth. However, extensive application of those biochars might require large-scale productions and distributions. To obtain the detail information regarding the impact of biochar application on the agro-ecosystem and surrounding atmosphere, further research activities may need to carry out under different agricultural production conditions. When model fitness was tested, it was found that DNDC model was fit for the simulation of crop yields and soil organic carbon under the conditions of the experimental site. Simulation of soil organic carbon dynamics and crop yields for 30 years and 50 years after the addition of biochars in combination with NPK fertilizers showed that such applications could maintain the crop yields at the same level up to 50 years. That could maintain soil organic carbon at a level higher than conventional NPK fertilizer application. Regarding the simulation of GHGs emissions, the model simulated nitrous oxide emission close to actual emissions of agricultural soils of Myanmar. Simulated CH4 emissions from control and conventional NPK fertilizer application variant were consistent with the well-known emissions of Myanmar rice fields. To confirm the accuracy of simulated CH4 emissions from biochar applied soils, it may need field investigations and validations of model results. Simulated effects of rice husk-, rice straw- and pigeon pea stem fresh biomass applications and that of rice husk-, rice straw- and pigeon pea stem biochar applications on rice, chickpea, cotton yields and soil organic carbon (SOC) were compared. Objective of this simulation was to compare the effects of fresh biomass-applications and the application of biochars produced from the same biomass on crop yields and SOC by using DNDC model. The results showed that simulated rice yields of rice husk biochar and rice straw biochar applications were 33% and 31%, respectively, higher than that of pigeon pea green manure applications. However, simulated rice yield from pigeon pea stem biochar application was 4% higher than that of iv pigeon pea stem green manure application. Simulated chickpea yield from pigeon pea green manure treatment was the highest among all of biochar and biomass applications. Simulated cotton yields obtained from fresh biomass applications were lower than that of biochar applications. In estimating the future yields, all crop yields from rice husk and rice straw biomass applications were lower than that of rice husk and rice straw biochar applications in the initial year of simulation. However, in the following years, the yields remained at the same level up to the end of simulated years. In pigeon pea stem green manure application, crop yields were higher than the other treatments since the initial year up to the end of simulated years. Simulated SOC was lower in fresh biomass applications compared to biochar applications.

Die Wichtigkeit, eine soziale Perspektive auf die Mensch-Natur-Beziehung einzunehmen, wird seit langer Zeit erkannt. Die Erforschung sozial-ökologischer Systeme sucht durch den Ausgleich der sozialen und ökologischen Ansichten ein holistisches Verständnis der Mensch-Natur-Beziehung zu erreichen. Hier strebte ich an, ein soziales Verständnis des Sächsischen Gebiets im Herzen Rumäniens zu entwickeln, indem ich erforschte, wie Einheimische die Mensch-Natur-Beziehung betrachten. Zu diesem Zweck verwendete ich die Konzepte der sozial-ökologischen Systeme (SES), der ökosystemischen Leistungen (ES) und der Kulturlandschaften, um die Wahrnehmung der Einheimischen durch empirische Fallstudien zu erfassen. Über eine ausgiebige Recherche bestehender Fachliteratur erstellte ich zuerst eine Übersicht über eine bestimmte Form der Mensch-Natur-Beziehung, in der weder verbrauchbare noch nutzenbringende Werte vorhanden sind (´kulturelle Ökosystemdienstleistungen´). Zweitens, um die Wechselwirkung von dem sozialen zum ökologischen System abzugrenzen und zur Sprache zu bringen, untersuchte ich, wie unterschiedlich die Einheimischen die Landschaften und ihre Funktionen in Südsiebenbürgen wahrnehmen. Diese mit den Landschaften verbundenen Präferenzen verortete ich dann konzeptionell, indem ich die potenzielle Landnutzung und deren Auswirkungen im Hinblick auf das Management verdeutlichte. Drittens, um die Mensch-Natur-Beziehung vom ökologischen zum sozialen System zu erfassen, studierte ich die Nutzung der Ökosystemdienstleistungen durch disaggregierte Personengruppen. Genauer untersuchte ich, welche Faktoren über die ökosystemischen Verfahren und Funktionen hinaus die von der Natur durch den Menschen abgeleiteten Vorteile aus Sicht der potenziellen Nutznießer beeinflussten. Ich entwarf ein Konzept über die vermittelnde Rolle einer Auswahl an zusammenhängenden Faktoren, die der aktuellen Verbreitung der ES in Verbindung mit der Beziehung zwischen den ES und den Vorteilen für den Menschen zugrunde liegen. Viertens, um ein Beispiel der wechselseitigen Mensch-Natur-Beziehung zu erforschen, betrachtete ich einen Sonderfall des Nebeneinanderbestehens von Menschen und Fleischfressern sowie die Mechanismen, welche dieses Miteinander beeinflussen. Auch wenn ich in dieser Dissertation ein umfangreiches und tiefgründiges Verständnis der menschlichen Dimension der untersuchten Systeme ansammelte, wählte ich vier Querthemen, um die Mensch-Natur-Beziehung in Südsiebenbürgen zu erläutern. Diese vier Themen mögen als Grundsäulen eines Verständnisses aus der sozialen Sicht, aber auch als mögliche Ziele für die Forschung oder Politiken dienen. Das erste Thema bezieht sich auf die Werte der Einheimischen, die der Schlüssel des Verständnisses der endemischen Mensch-Natur-Beziehung sind und in künftigen sozial-ökologischen Bewertungen oder politischen Eingriffen nicht zu übersehen sind. Das zweite Thema versteht die Kulturlandschaft in Südsiebenbürgen sowohl als einen physischen als auch einen virtuellen Raum der sozial-ökologischen Wechselwirkung, welcher dem Menschen Naturerfahrungen und sozial-ökologisches Wissens ermöglicht. Das dritte Thema, die Mannigfaltigkeit des sozialen Systems hinsichtlich ihrer Anforderungen an die Landschaft sowie deren Nutznießer der Ökosystemdienstleistungen erweitert die Betrachtungsweise der Mensch-Natur-Beziehungen, kann jedoch zugleich künftig eine Konflikt- oder Entkopplungsquelle sein, wenn sie unangemessen verwaltet wird. Zuletzt spielen die Kleinbauern eine wesentliche Rolle in der Aufrechterhaltung der Mensch-Natur-Beziehung dank ihrer Interaktion mit dem Land und den daraus hervorgegangenen Überzeugungen, aber ihre Werte und ihr Lebensstil sind bedroht.