Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2014 (24) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
- Dissertation (24) (entfernen)
Sprache
- Englisch (16)
- Deutsch (7)
- Mehrsprachig (1)
Schlagworte
- Biodiversität (2)
- Nachhaltigkeit (2)
- biodiversity (2)
- sustainability (2)
- Activated Sludge (1)
- Arbeitslosigkeit (1)
- Arbeitsmarkt (1)
- Bondholder Relations (1)
- Consumer Protection (1)
- Corporate Bond (1)
- Corporate Disclosure (1)
- Corporate Entrepreneurship (1)
- Ehrenamtliche Tätigkeit (1)
- Erkenntnistheorie (1)
- Ferntourismus (1)
- Fischerei (1)
- Flood (1)
- Franchising (1)
- Führung (1)
- Führungskraft (1)
- GIS (1)
- Geoinformationssystem (1)
- Gerechtigkeit (1)
- Globalisierung (1)
- Human Resources (1)
- Institutional change (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Kläranlage (1)
- Konfliktlösung (1)
- Kulturelle Kooperation (1)
- Kulturlandschaft (1)
- Landnutzung (1)
- Leadership (1)
- Negotiation (1)
- Organisational Development (1)
- Organisationsentwicklung (1)
- Organisationswandel (1)
- Personalpolitik (1)
- Personalwesen (1)
- Post (1)
- Postal sector (1)
- Reiseverhalten (1)
- Social Dilemma (1)
- Social entrepreneurship (1)
- Soziales Dilemma (1)
- Tourismus (1)
- Transnational civil society (1)
- Umweltbezogenes Management (1)
- Verbraucherschutz (1)
- Verkehrspsychologie (1)
- Versicherung (1)
- Wastewater treatment plant (1)
- challenge (1)
- cultural landscapes (1)
- democratic theory (1)
- environmental management (1)
- fishery (1)
- global tourism (1)
- justice (1)
- land-use change (1)
- tourism future (1)
- travel behavior (1)
- Überschwemmung (1)
Institut
- BWL (6)
- Nachhaltigkeitsmgmt./-ökologie (5)
- Chemie (2)
- VWL (2)
- Institut für Politikwissenschaft (IPW) (1)
- Institut für Ökologie (IE) (1)
- Kulturwissenschaften (1)
- Kulturwissenschaften (alt) (1)
- Politikwissenschaften (1)
- Psychologie (1)
Corruption as “the abuse of entrusted power for private gain” (Transparency International, 2013) is detrimental to economic, social and political development. It intensively violates the fundamental principles of democracy such as equality, fairness, transparency and accountability (Sandholtz and Taagepera, 2005). Europe exhibits a wide spectrum of corrupt activities and is characterized by large differences as to the extent and dynamics of corruption. Thus, it is astonishing that there is still little knowledge about the region-specific factors that determine corruption. Considering corruption as a multilevel phenomenon that takes place at the country level and is often measured by certain aggregated indices, this project examines corruption also at the individual level with data from the World Values Survey. The study includes 37 European countries at the macro level and 20 countries at the micro level (1995-2010). For comparative purposes and in order to uncover specific European determinants of corruption, all statistical calculations are run with an additional sample (“non-European country sample”), including countries world-wide. The results of the panel and multilevel analysis indicate that a country’s rate of inflation, international integration, the degree and duration of democracy, anti-corruption policy, the percentage of women in parliaments, religion, society’s history of corruption strongly influence the extent and dynamics of corruption at the country-level. At the individual level, an individual’s employment status, satisfaction with the financial situation, emancipative values, interpersonal trust and the justification of bribery are significant causes of corruption across and within European countries. A comparison of these results with the findings of the “world sample” clearly demonstrates that there are regional differences.
Die Dissertation hat vor, die in der Vorrede des Ursprungs des deutschen Trauerspiels dargestellte Erkenntnistheorie Walter Benjamins in fünf Schritten zu porträtieren: die Idee als objektive Anordnung der Phänomene und intentionslose Darstellung des Empirischen; die ideale Darstellung als monadologische Auffassung der Totalität; die Konfiguration der Ideen als lebende Form der verstreuten phänomenischen Elemente; die Zeit der Konfiguration als intermittierende Rhythmik der Erscheinung der verminderten Figur der Ewigkeit; das Wiedererkennen einer solchen Figur der Minorität als Zeichen des Echten bzw. des Ursprunges. Das Porträtieren wird demnach als theoretische Methode definiert - das Porträt als Instrument des Wiedererkennens der Erkennbarkeit.
Emotionen sind im Straßenverkehr überproportional vertreten und können negative Auswirkungen auf die Verkehrssicherheit haben. Die am häufigsten untersuchte Emotion in diesem Zusammenhang ist Ärger. Dieser führt zur Einengung der Aufmerksamkeit sowie einer optimistischeren Risikoeinschätzung. Zudem fallen ärgerliche Fahrer durch erhöhte Geschwindigkeiten auf - einer der Hauptursachen von Unfällen. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war es, herauszufinden, durch welche kognitiven Bewertungsdimensionen im Sinne der Appraisaltheorie nach Lazarus (1993) Ärger im Straßenverkehr bestimmt wird. Der Fragestellung wurde sich in drei empirischen Schritten genähert. Zu Beginn wurde eine Onlinebefragung mit dem Ziel durchgeführt, einen allgemeinen Überblick darüber zu geben, welche Emotionen im Straßenverkehr auftreten und welche Rolle Ärger dabei spielt. Als Erfassungsmethode des Emotionsspektrums im Straßenverkehr wurde eine Onlinevariante der Vignettenstudie gewählt. Den Probanden wurden zwölf Textvignetten - Verkehrsszenarien in Textform - vorgelegt, in die sie sich hinein versetzen und angeben sollten, welche Emotionen sie dabei empfanden. Die Verkehrssituationen wurden anhand von vier Appraisaldimensionen (Verantwortlichkeit, Zielrelevanz, Zielkongruenz und Vorsatz) erstellt, um den Verkehrsraum in seiner Breite abzubilden. Es konnte bestätigt werden, dass Ärger sowohl die häufigste als auch stärkste Emotion war. Nachdem die Wichtigkeit der Emotion bestätigt werden konnte, wurde in einem zweiten Schritt untersucht, welche weiteren Bewertungskomponenten im Sinne der Appraisaltheorie bei der Entstehung von Ärger im Straßenverkehr eine Rolle spielen. Dafür wurde als Methode eine Simulatorstudie mit anschließendem, qualitativem Interview gewählt. Das vordergründige Ziel war es, die aus der Literatur bekannten Dimensionen auf ihre Relevanz im Kontext Straßenverkehr zu überprüfen und zu erweitern. Neben der Bestätigung der Dimension Zielrelevanz ergaben sich bei den Interviews zwei weitere Bewertungsdimensionen: die wahrgenommene Kontrolle sowie der Grad des Verständnisses für die Blockierung. Sobald eine Person sich den Grund für eine Blockierung vorstellen konnte war der Ärger weniger intensiv. Die Studie zeigte vor allem, dass die objektiven Kriterien einer Situation (z.B. keine Kontrolle gegeben) nicht zwangsläufig die individuellen Bewertungen dieser widerspiegelten, woraus die These eines multiplen Mediatormodells entwickelt und in einer dritten Studie quantitativ getestet wurde. Die Dimensionen Verständnis und Kontrolle wurden daher in objektive Situationsmerkmale und individuelle Bewertungen unterteilt. Das Mediatormodell konnte insgesamt bestätigt werden. Dabei wurde der Ärger (AV) hauptsächlich durch die individuellen Bewertungen (Mediatoren) bestimmt. Der Effekt der externen Manipulation (UV) der Dimensionen Verständnis und Kontrolle wurde fast vollständig über deren individuelle Abbildung vermittelt. Die objektiven Gegebenheiten einer Situation (z.B. Begründung für Verhalten) können zwar die Bewertung beeinflussen, jedoch nicht die Stärke der Emotion direkt vorhersagen. Besonders die Dimension Verständnis zeigte großen Einfluss auf die Intensität - je höher der Grad des Verständnisses, umso geringer der Ärger. Somit beeinflusst das Geben einer Begründung für eine Blockierung im Straßenverkehr das individuelle Verständnis und minimiert den Ärger signifikant. Daraus ergeben sich direkte Anwendungsmöglichkeiten, um Ärger im Straßenverkehr abzuschwächen und das Risiko eines Unfalls zu minimieren.
Die Entfernung von Phosphor aus Abwasser bleibt ein Forschungsthema, das in Zukunft nur an Wichtigkeit gewinnen kann. Das wird durch die Umweltauswirkungen der Eutrophierung und den Verlust eines essentiellen Nährstoffes für die Nahrungsmittelproduktion dessen Knappheit immer offensichtlicher wird, immer deutlicher. Auf Kläranlagen werden heute hauptsächlich zwei Techniken verwendet um Phosphor zu entfernen, biologisch aktive Verfahren wie das Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) Verfahren und Fällungstechniken unter Verwendung von Metallsalzen. Bei beiden Methoden gibt es gegenwärtig Schwierigkeiten wie z.B. die Instabilität des EBPR Prozesses wegen des Mangels an Wissen über die Grundlagen des Stoffwechselprozesses. Bei der Verwendung von Fällungsmitteln kommt es zu vielen Nachteilen im Zusammenhang mit der Nachbehandlung des Schlammes, bei der Entsorgung kommt es zu dem Verlust der Schlammmassen und damit auch des Phosphors aus dem Nährstoffkreislauf. Das Ergebnis dieser Forschung ist, dass es möglich ist, die Phosphorspeicherkapazität von Belebtschlamm zu erhöhen wenn dieser spezifische Anforderungen erfüllt. Diese Anforderungen werden wie folgt zusammengefasst: Die Schlammmasse muss in der Lage sein, EBPR Prozesse zu entwickeln, auch muss der Schlamm aus einem Belebungsbecken-System kommen, weil die Schlammflocken unter den Umgebungsbedingungen des Reaktors stabilisiert worden sind. Schließlich muss der Belebtschlamm aus einem Verfahren kommen, bei dem man für die Phosphorentfernung keine Metallsalze verwendet. Die erhöhte Phosphorstoffspeicherkapazität der Belebtschlammmassen in Verbindung mit der Möglichkeit den Phosphor aus dem Belebtschlamm über Rücklösung in die wässrige Phase wieder gewinnen zu können, bietet großes Potential in der Zukunft einen in der Abwasserwirtschaft geschlossenen Phosphorkreislauf zu entwickeln und so den Verlust des wichtigen Nährstoffes nachhaltig zu verhindern.
In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden zwei etablierte soziale Dilemmata (Beitragsund Verteilungsdilemma) auf das Feld der Verhandlungsforschung übertragen. Die Parteien mussten entweder über die Verteilung von geteilten Ressourcen oder über den Beitrag zu geteilten Ressourcen in einem integrativen Verhandlungssetting verhandeln. Zusätzlich wurde die Valenz der verhandelten Ressourcen variiert (positive vs. negative Ressourcen). In insgesamt vier Studien wurde demonstriert, dass die Kombination aus Allokationskontext (Beitrag vs. Verteilung) und Ressourcenvalenz (Profite vs. Lasten) zu distinkten regulatorischen Foki führt, welche wiederum die Qualität der Verhandlungsergebnisse beeinflussen. Darüberhinaus wird der Einfluss der regulatorischen Passung in Verhandlungen um Gegenstände mit unterschiedlichen Ergebnisstrukturen gezeigt, sowie die Relevanz der vorliegenden Forschung für die Forschungsfelder der Allmende-, und Sozialen- Dilemma-Forschung diskutiert.
Human activities have converted natural ecosystems worldwide, mostly for agricultural purposes. This change in land use has been recognized as one of the key drivers causing mass extinction of biodiversity. Yet, there are species which persist particularly in traditional, low-intensity agricultural areas. However, this farmland biodiversity is increasingly threatened by the consequences of land-use intensification and land abandonment. One effect of these two processes is the change in existing landscape structures. This dissertation aimed at quantifying the relationship between biodiversity and landscape structures because a better understanding of current biodiversity patterns and their drivers is needed to navigate biodiversity conservation for a sustainable development. Specifically, this dissertation anticipates the impacts of land-use change on biodiversity in Southern Transylvania, focusing on butterflies and plants as study groups. In a first step, a methodological baseline for subsequent biodiversity studies is developed by exploring an optimal survey strategy, allocating the available resources in a study design that enables high statistical power and covers a wide range of environmental conditions. This study shows that in the highly heterogeneous farmland mosaic of Southern Transylvania, survey effort can be moderately reduced while still showing similar patterns of species richness, species turnover and species composition (Chapter 2). In a second step, biodiversity patterns of plants and butterflies are empirically investigated in response to different landscape structures, particularly towards heterogeneity and woody vegetation cover. These studies provide evidence that all main land-use types in Southern Transylvania, namely arable land, grassland and forests, contribute to an overall landscape pool. Species richness of plants, but not of butterflies, differed significantly between arable land and grassland. Presence of woody vegetation in farmland had a positive effect on plant species richness. Heterogeneity has been found beneficial for butterfly species richness in arable land, but not in grasslands. Species composition of plants was determined by land-use, but butterfly species composition was widely overlapping in arable land and grassland (Chapters 3 & 4). Investigations on the potential spread of invasive plant species in the Transylvanian landscape exhibited that distance to roads and heterogeneity, especially in arable land, were key variables determining the invasibility of the landscape (Chapter 5). By studying movement patterns of butterflies in agricultural landscapes, land-use intensity could be revealed having an impact on butterfly movements. Furthermore, butterflies were found to prefer non-arable patches within farmland (Chapter 6). In a third step, this dissertation conceptually embeds socio-economic considerations into the local and international discourse on sustainable rural development: Reflections on a participatory projects on establishing butterfly monitoring in Romania conclude that involving citizens in biodiversity conservation is possible in Romania, but need tailored approaches which consider the unique social and cultural settings (Chapter 7). Current recommendations from scientific literature to increase the agricultural yield, for example in Eastern European landscapes, through ´sustainable intensification´ for global food security are scrutinized for their engagement with sustainability. This dissertation concludes that genuine sustainable solutions need to respect the various aspects of sustainability, including procedural and distributive justice. Furthermore, it is clarified that general recommendations for agricultural intensification, for instance in Romania, may lead to devastating impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem functions (Chapter 8). This dissertation provides evidence that the beneficial characteristics of the Translvanian farmland are linked to the fine spatial scale of the agricultural mosaic, the amount and distribution of semi-natural elements and the scattered woody vegetation throughout the landscape. Hence, the future of biodiversity depends on human interventions in the ancient cultural landscape. Navigating biodiversity conservation in Southern Transylvania thus needs genuine sustainable solutions, which integrate socially acceptable and ecological meaningful landscape management.
The concept of corporate entrepreneurship continues to occupy the minds of scholars and practitioners alike. This is not surprising as corporate entrepreneurship constitutes a major driver of organizational revitalization, learning, and growth within large and medium size organizations. However, despite extensive research on corporate entrepreneurship, there is still confusion about the interplay of its macro- and micro-level constituents. To unveil how the structures, practices, and behaviors, which constitute entrepreneurship in large, diversified firms, interact, I utilize a systemic reasoning and link the notion of corporate entrepreneurship to diverse theoretical positions in the strategic management field including intraorganizational ecology, institutional theory, and configuration theory - links that have been so far neglected in the literature on corporate entrepreneurship. I develop my arguments in three complementary articles. In the first article, I provide a review of the theoretical framework that to a large extent underpins my research: the Bower-Burgelman process model. In the second article, I take a qualitative case study approach to analyze how micro-level practices affect the intraorganizational and external environment in favor of an entrepreneurial initiative. In the third article, I identify four different design types on the basis of a qualitative meta-synthesis, which reflect coherent constellations of managerial interpretive-schemes, structures, and systems that cultivate entrepreneurial behavior. In sum, this dissertation contributes to a new understanding of corporate entrepreneurship as a system of entrepreneurially behaving actors who are constrained and simultaneously enabled by a set of social, cultural, political, and structural context factors.
This paper-based dissertation deals with the concepts of economic heterogeneity and environmental uncertainty from different perspectives, and at multiple levels of abstraction. At its core sits the observation that heterogeneity and uncertainty are deeply entangled, for there would be no uncertainty without heterogeneity of options to act regarding multiple future states of the world. At the same time, heterogeneity - in the form of diversification - has been suggested as a way to reduce uncertainty in portfolio theory (Markowitz 1952). The dissertation evolves around two research foci: (1) methodological implications of heterogeneity of scientific theories in the face of empirical data (Paper 1), and (2) two different forms of uncertainty are considered, environmental risk (Paper 2) and Knightian uncertainty (Paper 3). Paper 1 develops a new framework for model selection for the special case of fitting size distribution models to empirical data. It combines Bayesian and frequentist statistical approaches with the criterion of model microfoundation, which is to select, all other things considered being equal, the model that comes with a suitable micromodel, that explains, from the perspective of the individual constituent, the genesis of the overall size distribution. The approach is subsequently illustrated with size distribution data on commercial cattle farms in Namibia. We find that the double-Pareto lognormal distribution fits the data best. Our approach might have the potential to reconcile one of the oldest debates in current economics, i.e. the one about the best model to describe and explain the distribution of economic key variables such as income, wealth and city sizes in a country. The second paper revisits the Namibian commercial cattle farm data and uses it to put some theories from the agricultural economics literature regarding farm management under environmental risk to an empirical test. We focus on the relations between inter-annual variability in rainfall (environmental risk), risk preferences, farm size and stocking rate. We demonstrate that the Pareto distribution - which separates the distribution into two parts - is a statistically plausible description of the empirical farm size distribution when ´farm size´ is operationalized by herd size, but not by rangeland area. A statistical group comparison based on the two parts of the Pareto distribution shows that large farms are on average exposed to significantly lower environmental risk. Regarding risk preferences, we do not find any significant differences in mean risk attitude between the two branches. Our analysis confirms the central role of the stocking rate as farm management parameter, and shows that environmental risk and the farmer´s gender are key variables in explaining stocking rates in our data. Paper 3 develops a non-expected-utility approach to decision making under Knightian uncertainty which circumvents some of the conceptual problems of existing approaches. We understand Knightian uncertainty as income lotteries with known payoffs but unknown probabilities in each outcome. Based on seven axioms, we show that there uniquely (up to linear-affine transformations) exists an additive and extensive function from the set of Knightian lotteries to the real numbers that represents uncertainty preferences on the subset of lotteries with fixed positive sum of payoffs over all possible states of the world. We define the concept of uncertainty aversion such that it allows for interpersonal comparison of uncertainty attitudes. Furthermore, we propose Renyi´s (1961) generalized entropy as a one-parameter preference function, where the parameter measures the degree of uncertainty aversion. We illustrate it with a simple decision problem and compare it to other decision rules under uncertainty (maximin, maximax, Laplacian expected utility, minimum regret, Hurwicz).
During recent decades, the arenas of political decision-making have increasingly shifted from national governments to intergovernmental and transnational political forums. At the same time, the number and relevance of non-state actors in international politics is steadily growing. These trends have led political scientists to study and theorize about new forms of democracy beyond the national political arenas (Archibugi 2004, Bexell et al. 2010, Nasström 2010). However, democracy beyond the nation state is difficult to conceptualize with the idea of an institutionalized democracy within the borders of nation-states. Instead, many political scientists emphasize the role of civil society actors as a cure for the democratic deficit in inter-national politics (Steffek & Nanz 2008). Yet, normative and empirical problems arise over the extent of access, selection and role of civil society actors in international organizations (Tallberg et al. 2013). Furthermore, the normative relevance of transnational civil society actors makes it necessary to study their own democratic legitimacy. While international organizations are mostly institutionalized and hierarchical governing bodies, the ever growing diffuse conglomerate of non-state actors is characterized by fluid structures, blurry boundaries and a multi-level setting of interaction (Keck & Sikkink 1998). Thus, in studying democratic practice in transnational civil society networks, we must ask: How institutionalized do political practices have to be and how flexible can they be, to still be considered democratic? Normative theorists reconceptualized democracy in the light of this changing context (Bohman 2007). Recent concepts of participatory, deliberative and representative democracy attempt to reconfigure existing democratic institutions through procedural elements (Fung & Wright 2003, Dryzek 2006) or innovative forms of representation (Phillips 1998, Mansbridge 2003, Castiglione & Warren 2006). This emerging theoretical framework is well suited to analyze the extent, to which democratic practices exist within transnational civil society networks. By applying the concept of practice (Giddens 1984, Schatzki et al. 2005) as a bridging tool between the empirical reality of fluid, temporary and open transnational civil society networks on the one hand and the institution-oriented democratic theory on the other hand, this study explores the extent to which democratic practice develops in a field that lacks traditional institutions to guarantee citizen participation. As innovative transnational actors, civil society networks can bring up new forms of democratic practice (see Polletta 2006) that can potentially inspire the debate about transnational democracy as such. This study, with its innovate approach, hopes to invigorate the debate about transnational democracy and transnational civil society, which has stalled to some degree in recent years. The study is divided into three parts; first, a conceptual part that clarifies the question of how democracy as practice can be theoretically conceptualized in transnational civil society net-works, which is followed by an empirical exploration of political practices in the transnational civil society networks. In this second part, the main question is how participation, representation and deliberation practice develops in transnational civil society networks. Two cases of transnational civil society networks, the Clean Clothes Campaign and Friends of the Earth, are analyzed to provide insights into the democratic practice within transnational civil society. In the final part, the empirical findings are evaluated in the light of the outlined concepts of democratic theory in order to explore how democratic these political practices actually are. The study identifies implicit and in-process practices of democratic norms in transnational civil society networks. Political practice in transnational civil society networks can become demo-cratic through empowerment measures and trustful relationships. However, deliberate demo-cratic practice can be impeded by disembodied digital communication and complex decision-making. The study explores how new forms of democratic practice emerge in the interaction between political actors and the structural environments of actors and networks.