Open Access

Undertaking local actions, such as implementing public (sustainability) policy, plays a crucial role in achieving sustainable development (SD) at the municipal level. In this regard, indicator-based assessment supports effective implementation by measuring the SD process, based upon evidence-based outcomes that indicators produce. Over the last decade, using subjective indicators, which rely on an individual’s self-perception to measure subjects, has gained its significance in sustainability assessment, in line with the increasing importance of signifying individual’s and community’s well-being (WB) in the context of SD. This study aims to discuss and clarify the scope and functions of subjective sustainable development indicators (SDIs) conceptually and theoretically while examining the usability of such indicators employed in the practice of assessing sustainability policy and action process in a Japanese municipality. Furthermore, the potential usability of using subjective SDIs in monitoring a municipal initiative of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is also explanatorily examined. The present paper consists of a framework paper and three individual studies. In the framework paper, Section 1 introduces the global transition of SD discourse and the role that local authorities and implementing public policy play in achieving SD while outlining how WB positions in the SD context. Section 2 provides a brief overview of the major scope of overall SDIs at the conceptual and theoretical levels. Section 3 defines WB in the study’s own right while exploring the scope of indicators measuring WB. In addition, this study strives to further clarify the peculiar scope of SDIs, measuring WB by synthesising the findings. Section 4 overviews how SD at the municipal level in Japan is practiced while acknowledging the extent to which residents perceive WB and SDGs in policymaking. Section 5 provides a brief yet extensive summary of the three individual studies. Section 6 discusses the findings while presenting implications for further study and practices of subjective SDIs. Furthermore, the three individual studies provide a thorough and in-depth discussion of the study subject. Study 1 illustrates the SD trend at the municipal level in Japan and the growing recognition of using subjective SDIs in public (sustainability) policy assessment in exploring comparative SDI systems to municipality groups. The findings, in turn, raise the need for a further study on subjective SDIs. Study 2 extensively discusses the concept of WB as the overarching subject to be measured while examining varying approaches and scopes of SDIs. It identifies three differentiated WB (i.e., material and social objective WB as well as subjective WB) and distinctive approaches of subjective SDIs (i.e., expert-led and citizen-based approaches) alongside objective SDIs. The findings suggest that these SDIs identified are, conceptually, most capable of measuring associated WB; for instance, citizen-based subjective SDIs can most optimally measure subjective WB. Finally, Study 3 examines the usability of (citizen-based) subjective SDIs in a practice of assessing public policy, aiming at municipal SD, and the potential usability of using such indicators in monitoring a municipal SDG initiative. The findings highlight the determinants and obstacles of using subjective SDIs as well as signifying WB in measuring progress of a municipal SD practice.

Globalization with its increasing emergence of global value chains is one of the main driving forces behind persisting unsustainable production and consumption patterns. The global coffee market provides a fitting example, as it is connected to many sustainability issues like the persisting poverty of coffee farmers, and degrading ecosystems. Many interventions, from state-led regulation to industry-led certification processes, exist, that try to change global value chains to shift societies back on more sustainable trajectories. However, due to the complexity and manifold connections between social and ecological factors, global value chains pose a wicked problem. To this date, it is still under debate if these interventions are an effective means to change global value chains. With climate change and persisting issues of social justice as strong accelerators, calls are increasingly made for a radical transformation of global production and consumption patterns. Many frameworks try to inform research and real-world policies for a transformation of global value chains. In this dissertation, I use the framework of the practical, political and personal sphere proposed by O’Brien and Sygna (2013). The authors highlight that the interactions between these three spheres bare the greatest potential for a transformation towards sustainability. However, in this dissertation, I argue that it is exactly at the nexus between the three spheres of transformation where barriers towards a fundamental shift of systems occur. I, therefore, use three perspectives to bring empirical nuance to the problems that arise on the interplay between the different spheres of transformation. These perspectives are: (1) the scientific perspective: using a systematic review of alternative trade arrangements; (2) the producer perspective: facilitating a participatory network analysis of social-ecological challenges of Ugandan coffee farmers and their adaptive management practices; (3) the consumer perspective: through the use of a German consumer survey and a structural equation model to investigate into the Knowledge-Doing-Gap end-consumers are facing. These three perspectives bring empirical nuance to the interplay between the different spheres as they highlight the real-world barriers that arise within and at the nexus of the three spheres. Through the results from the scientific perspective, I am able to show that most of the research is investigating the certified market and that the effectiveness of labels rarely exceeding the practical sphere. My empirical research on the producer perspective highlights that Ugandan coffee farmers facilitate a variety of on-farm crop management (practical sphere) but their support structures rarely exceed informal exchange with neighboring communities (political sphere). Exchange with governmental actors and global traders is happening but has been assessed as not sufficient to cope with the social-ecological challenges the producers are facing. Through the results of the consumer perspective, I am able to highlight that even though end-consumers have pro-sustainable attitudes (personal sphere) they are facing situational constraints (political sphere) that create a gap between their attitudes and the respective behavior. Using these empirical insights about drivers and barriers for a transformation I propose that frameworks, aiming to inform research and policies, need to include two aspects: (1) the notion of a forced transformation as one of the major influencing factors for a deliberative transformation; and (2) the translational capacity of the frameworks to create meaningful interdisciplinary discourses in different contexts. I, therefore, propose two approaches that should function as a starting point for further development of transformation frameworks (1) a fourth sphere, called the “planetary force” to include the notion of a forced transformation that is already happening in different contexts, highlighted by the producer perspective in this dissertation; and (2) the consequent use of methods that create interdisciplinary exchange and rigorous testing.

Understanding that entrepreneurship can be better modeled from a systemic point of view is a primordial aspect that determines the important role of universities in entrepreneurial ecosystems. What makes the ecosystem approach a valuable tool for understanding social systems is that, from a holistic perspective, their behavior seems to have emerging characteristics. The impact of this “research object” can only be revealed through interrelated causal chains similar to the behavior of natural ecosystems (Mars et al., 2012). Therefore, the entrepreneurial ecosystem concept provides a unique perspective that complements previous studies on networked economic activity with a clear focus on the systemic elements that support entrepreneurship, and an emphasis on policy that promote the entrepreneurial process. This dissertation presents a dual scientific account of the entrepreneurship phenomenon in universities. The work is divided into two equal parts, each of which is composed of two research papers. The narrative of the first half takes on a macro perspective view, consisting of one theoretical and one empirically-based conceptual case study. This part conceptually depicts a systematic approach to entrepreneurialism in higher education, namely an ecosystems perspective. The second half concentrates on the meso- and micro levels of study from the university’s point of view, comprising of a case study as historical account for the emergence of the entrepreneurial university, and of a metasynthesis of empirical case studies in entrepreneurial universities, which serves as the basis for the development of entrepreneurial university archetypes. This doctoral work contributes to an in-depth understanding of Entrepreneurship in universities regarding its systemic qualities and archetypal characteristics of entrepreneurial universities. It argues for an ecosystem’s perspective on the phenomenon of entrepreneurial activity, highlighting the fundamental role that universities play as the heart of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Furthermore, this research expands on the novel concept of the entrepreneurial university by using extensive case study literature to empirically identify distinct archetypes that better reflect the diverse reality of how universities engage as entrepreneurial actors by way of differentiated entrepreneurial structures, systems, and strategies.

This doctoral thesis deals with the topic of organizational misconduct and covers the three salient research streams in this area by addressing its performance outcomes, antecedents, and preventive measures. Specifically, it is concerned with the question of how different forms of misconduct are reflected in the stock performance of related organizations, thereby, covering the three pillars of corporate sustainability environmental, social, and governance (ESG). Furthermore, it aims to conceptualize how individual cognitive biases may lead to misconduct, therefore, potentially representing an antecedent and how existing management control systems can be enhanced to effectively address specific forms of misconduct, respectively. To these ends, I first review the research stream of stock price reactions to environmental pollution events in terms of the underlying research samples, methodological specifications, and theoretical underpinnings. Based on the findings of the systematic literature review (SLR), I perform three stock-based event studies of the Volkswagen diesel emissions scandal (Dieselgate), workplace sexual harassment (#MeToo accusations), and the 2003 blackout in the US to cove the three ESG dimensions, respectively. In line with the SLR, my event studies reveal substantial stock losses to firms involved in misconduct that are eventually even accompanied by a spillover effect to uninvolved bystanders. Then, I review the extant literature conceptually to develop a framework outlining how moral licensing as an individual cognitive bias might lead to a self-attribution of corporate sustainability, a consecutive accumulation of moral credit, and a later exchange of this credit by engaging in misconduct afterward. Finally, I assess existing workplace sexual harassment management controls, such as awareness training and grievance procedures critically in another conceptual analysis. Based on the shortcomings stemming from management controls’ focus on compliance and negligence of moral duties, I introduce five specific nudges firms should consider to enhance their existing management controls and eventually prevent occurrences of workplace sexual harassment. Based on the six distinct articles within this doctoral thesis, I outline its limitations and point at directions for future research. These mainly address providing further evidence on the long-term performance effects of organizational misconduct, enriching our knowledge on further cognitive biases eventually leading to misconduct, and conceptualizing nudging beyond the use-case of workplace sexual harassment.

Der Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien als Ausprägung des klimaschutzpolitischen Substitutionsansatzes wird in Deutschland mithilfe verschiedener Gesetze gesteuert. Dabei haben sich in mehr als 30 Jahren umfangreiche Regelungsstrukturen herausgebildet. Besonders ausgeprägt ist dies im Stromsektor zu beobachten. Hier kön-nen ausgehend vom Kartellrecht über den Zwischenschritt des Stromeinspeisungsgesetzes bis zu den verschie-denen Fassungen des Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetzes vielfältige Entwicklungslinien anhand ausgewählter kon-kreter Veränderungen aufgezeigt werden. Sowohl im Hinblick auf Änderungsdynamik wie -tiefe deutlich weni-ger ausgeprägt sind dagegen die Entwicklungslinien im Wärmesektor. Diese nehmen ihren gesetzlichen Ur-sprung erst 2009 mit dem Erneuerbare-Energien-Wärmegesetz, um dann zusammen mit den gebäudebezoge-nen Effizienzregelungen 2020 infolge eines umfassenden rechtlichen Konsolidierungsschritts im Gebäudeener-giegesetz zu münden. Die Ausgestaltungsschritte im deutschen Erneuerbare-Energien-Recht sind auf vielfältige Weise mit den Ent-wicklungen im europäischen Rechtsrahmen zur Steuerung des Ausbaus der erneuerbaren Energien verwoben. Dies betrifft zunächst die Judikatur zu den primärrechtlichen Anforderungen an die Ausgestaltung mitglied-staatlicher Förderinstrumente, gilt aber besonders für die Entwicklungen im Sekundärrecht. Hier hat sich seit 2001 in mehreren Schritten eine immer detailliertere sekundärrechtliche Ordnung entwickelt. Dabei beinhalten die Entwicklungen der Erneuerbare-Energien-Richtlinien nicht nur eindimensional Steuerungs- und Bindungs-wirkungen von der supranationalen in Richtung der mitgliedstaatlichen Ebene. Vielmehr finden sich darin auch Entwicklungen zur Beschränkung der europarechtlichen Einflüsse, namentlich der Vorgaben zur Warenver-kehrsfreiheit und des Beihilferechts, die eine unmittelbare Reaktion der Mitgliedstaaten auf die Entscheidun-gen der europäischen Gerichte und der Europäischen Kommission darstellen. Das Erneuerbare-Energien-Recht ist zudem eingebettet in das übergreifende Umweltenergie- und Klima-schutzrecht. Mit der sowohl auf europäischer als auch deutscher Ebene im Werden befindlichen umfassenden Klimaschutzordnung lassen sich ebenso wie mit dem sich fortlaufend ändernden Instrumentenmix zahlreiche Wechselwirkungen feststellen. Der mit der neuen Klimaschutz-Governance geschaffene prozedurale Rahmen etabliert ein System von Klimaschutzzielen, Evaluierungs- und Nachsteuerungsvorgaben. Dieser ist aber mit dem Erneuerbare-Energien-Recht und dessen Zielen nur lose verbunden. Detaillierungsgrad und Steuerungs-wirkung der europäischen und der deutschen Klimaschutz-Governance unterscheiden sich dabei deutlich, was auch mit den stärkeren Koordinationsbedürfnissen im eher vertikal orientierten supranationalen Regelungs-verbund begründet ist. Dass die Entwicklung im Erneuerbare-Energien-Recht in absehbarer Zeit zu einem Endpunkt gelangen könnten, ist nicht zu erwarten. Dies wird deutlich, wenn die tatsächlichen Herausforderungen der Transformation und aktuell diskutierte Themenfelder für die weitere Fortschreibung dieses Rechtsbereichs betrachtet werden. Dabei sind die verschiedenen Dimensionen der Integration erneuerbarer Energien zur Vertiefung der System-transformation ebenso von Bedeutung, wie Regelungen zu Akzeptanz und Teilhabe sowie zur Beantwortung der Verteilungsfragen einerseits und eine Reduktion des Komplexitätsumfangs im Recht anderseits.