Open Access

Biodiversity is quickly diminishing across the planet, primarily owing to human pressures. Protected areas are an essential tool for conserving biodiversity in response to increasing human pressures. However, their ecological effectiveness is contested and their capacity to resist human pressures differ. This dissertation aimed to assess the ecological effectiveness of different protection levels (from strict to less strictly protected: national park, game reserve, forest reserve, game-controlled area, and unprotected areas) in biodiversity (both mega diverse butterflies and mammals), maintaining habitat connectivity, and reducing anthropogenic threats at the wider landscape in the Katavi-Rukwa Ecosystem of southwestern Tanzania. To achieve this overarching goal, I employed an interdisciplinary approach. First, I analyzed butterfly diversity and community composition patterns across protection levels in the Katavi-Rukwa Ecosystem. I found that species richness and abundance were highest in the game reserves and game-controlled areas, intermediate in the forest reserves, national park and unprotected areas. Species composition differed significantly among protection levels. Landscape heterogeneity, forest cover, and primary productivity influenced species composition. Land-use, burned areas, forest cover, and primary productivity explained the richness of species and functional traits. Game reserves hosted most indicator species. Second, I modelled the spatial distribution of six large mammal target species (buffalo Syncerus caffer, elephant Loxodonta africana, giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis, hartebeest Alcelaphus buselaphus, topi Damaliscus korrigum, and zebra Equus burchellii) across environmental and protection gradients in the Katavi-Rukwa Ecosystem. Based on species-specific density surface models, I found relatively consistent effects of protection level and land-use variables on the spatial distribution of the target mammal species: relative densities were highest in the national park and game reserves, intermediate in forest reserves and game-controlled areas and lowest in un-protected areas. Beyond species-specific environmental predictors for relative densities, our results highlight consistent negative associations between relative densities of the target species and distance to cropland and avoidance of areas in proximity to houses. Third, I examined temporal changes in land-use, population densities and distribution of six large mammal target species across protection levels between 1991 and 2018. During the surveyed period, cropland increased from 3.4 % to 9.6 % on unprotected land and from ≤0.05 % to <1 % on protected land. Wildlife densities of most, but not all target species declined across the entire landscape, yet the onset of the observed wildlife declines occurred several years before the onset of cropland expansion. Across protection levels, wildlife densities occurred at much greater densities in the national park and game reserves and lowest in the forest reserves, game-controlled areas and unprotected areas. Based on logistic regression models, target species preferred the national park over less strictly protection levels and areas distant to cropland. Because these analyses do not support a direct relationship between the timing of land-use change and wildlife population dynamics, other factors may account for the apparent ecosystem-wide decline in wildlife. Fourth, I quantified land-use changes, modelled habitat suitability and connectivity of elephant over time across a large protected area network in southwestern Tanzania. Based on analyses of remotely-sensed data, cropland increased from 7% in 2000 to 13% in 2019, with an average expansion of 634 km2 per year. Based on ensemble models, distance from cropland influenced survey-specific habitat suitability for elephant the most. Despite cropland expansion, the locations of the modelled elephant corridors (n=10) remained similar throughout the survey period. According to ecological knowledge, nine of the modelled corridors were active, whereas one modelled corridor had been inactive since the 1970s. Based on circuit theory, I prioritize three corridors for protected area connectivity. Key indicators of corridor quality varied over time, whereas elephant movement through some corridors appears to have increased over time. Overall, this dissertation underpins differences in ecological effectiveness of protected areas within one ecosystem. It highlights the need to utilize a landscape conservation approach to guide effective conservation across the entire protection gradient. It also suggests the need to enforcing land use plans and having alternative and sustainable forms for generating income from the land without impairing wildlife habitat.

Contemporary society is shaped by the idea that time is, above all, a scarce economic resource that must be used efficiently – “time is money” not to be wasted. Increasingly, however, scientific findings suggest that such a way of perceiving of time seems a major cause of the current global climate and sustainability crisis. So far, this research has often focused on mobility, energy consumption, or the structural conditions of the social organisation of time. Considerably less work has been carried out in relation to the role of individual time-related needs regarding unsustainable consumption behaviour, although consumer research has been addressing needs-oriented approaches to sustainable consumption for a long time. Environmental and Sustainability Education (ESE) is considered an essential strategy to achieve the global sustainability goals of Agenda 2030. Internationally, as well as on a national level, ESE is increasingly mainstreamed in educational curricula and practice, including in Germany. Given the relation between time, needs and sustainability, it appears valuable to inquire into this field from the perspective of ESE – where time as a resource for sustainability has received comparatively little attention so far. The core research interest of this cumulative dissertation is therefore the question of how the connection between time, our needs and sustainability can be conveyed through pedagogical approaches. The inquiry used an exploratory, qualitative research design to address this question. In a first step, the concept of sustainability-related time use competence was developed. This then served as a guiding concept for the understanding of time used in this work and as the overall objective for the educational intervention developed and piloted as part of the research. Next, a content analysis of German curricula was conducted with the aim of determining whether and to what extent these address the relation between time and sustainability. The results show curricula contain only a few starting points that encourage a connection between time and sustainability in school lessons. The study further indicates that an understanding of time as a scarce resource to be used efficiently has prevailed in school contexts so far. Accordingly, pedagogical approaches to time often focus heavily on time management. The next step involved developing and piloting a time use competence curriculum in cooperation with three partner schools, using an Action Research Approach. This intervention followed the pedagogical approach of Self-Inquiry Based Learning (SIBL) seeking to sensitise learners to the relation between individual needs and consumer behaviour. During implementation, which lasted one semester, students logged their time, were encouraged to reflect on their personal needs, and subsequently implement individual change projects related to time use. This was embedded in continuous reflective individual and group exercises. The results strengthen the hypothesis that there is a relation between time use and sustainability. Furthermore, the pedagogical approach of SIBL has proven suitable to enable students to reflect on their time use and to raise their awareness of the role of individual needs. Participants reported that changes in time use did indeed increase their personal well-being. This, according to existing evidence from sustainability science, has been found to potentially lead to more sustainable behaviour. At the same time, previous research found that behavioural changes that lead to an increase in well-being do not automatically lead to more sustainable consumption behaviour. Rather, personal attitudes and motivation regarding sustainability are important. This suggests that future ESE interventions aiming at changes in time use should always also contain sufficient opportunities for reflection of values and motives. A third empirical study was carried out, inquiring into students’ time use during the eriod of COVID-19-induced school closures, using a Grounded Theory Approach. Since the pandemic disrupted young peoples’ routines drastically, the research focused on which kinds of learning experiences students made during this time and which insights can be derived for ESE. The results of the semi-structured interviews with 69 participants show first that the narrative of students’ learning loss, which is predominant in the current educational science, policy, and media discussion, falls short. Instead, a variety of learning experiences are revealed, such as learning one’s own learning and everyday rhythms or creatively adapting consumption habits to the new situation of “lockdown”. Overall, a key finding of this work is that students are currently unable to adequately realise their time-related needs. In view of the findings from research on time and sustainability, one recommendation is therefore that everyday school life could give students more space to organise their time according to their needs. This might be done through pedagogical measures in the classroom, but would also require a stronger institutional anchoring, for example, within the framework of the Whole Institution Approach to Sustainability (WIA), to bring about lasting changes. Furthermore, it would be advisable to give the topic of time in connection with sustainability more space in curricula and in teacher training. This gives rise to future research needs, such as the need to explore how time use competence can be included into everyday pedagogical practice, for instance, by adapting the SIBL approach piloted in a school setting here. It would also call for longitudinal research designs, and it would be of interest to research how time use competence might be incorporated into school development processes. Given the ongoing debate about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on schools and education in general, the findings of the research can stimulate both further research and future ESE practice. The experiences during the pandemic have shown that schools and all actors involved including students and teachers, are so far insufficiently prepared to handle crises. Here, the approach to time use competence piloted in this work can offer valuable stimulations for ESE research and practice. This is especially true since it is compatible with existing approaches to key competencies for sustainability by seeking to complement them with a stronger focus on individual, needs-oriented time shaping.

In seinem ersten Kinofilm „Abschied von gestern“ erzählt Alexander Kluge 1966 den Fall »Anita G.«. Ausgehend von diesem Film stellt sich die Frage nach den Rechtsverhältnissen in Kluges Geschichten: vom Sachverhalt zum Fall, vom Gesetz zur Erzählung, von der Ermittlung, die dem Urteil schließlich widersteht. Interessant ist in diesem Zusammenhang auch die universitäre „Vorgeschichte“ des Autors und Filmemachers. Mit dem Jura-Studium in Marburg und Frankfurt schreibt sich Kluge 1950 in die universitären Abläufe ein, denen er als Referendar institutionell folgt: im Amtsgericht Wiesbaden und im Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt, in der Jugendstrafanstalt, im Landgericht und der Kammer für Handelssachen. An diesen Stationen begegnet er Vorfällen und Prozessen, die seinen filmischen und literarischen Arbeiten voran gehen. Denn Kluges Figuren stehen vor dem Gesetz und folgen eher einer Poetik des Falls als seiner Auflösung.

Freiwillig Engagierte als Koproduzent:innen der Teilhabe geflüchteter Familien in frühpädagogischen Angeboten in Niedersachsen. Deutungen von freiwillig Engagierten, Koordinator:innen und geflüchteten Eltern. Während die gleichberechtigte Teilhabe geflüchteter Familien an frühpädagogischen Angeboten erklärtes integrationspolitisches Ziel ist, gibt es Hinweise darauf, dass diese besonderen Herausforderungen unterliegt und dass freiwillig Engagierte dabei häufig involviert sind. Dabei ist wenig über die Dynamiken bekannt, wie freiwillig Engagierte geflüchtete Familien im Bereich der frühkindlichen Bildung, Betreuung und Erziehung begleiten, insbesondere aus Perspektive von geflüchteten Eltern und ihren Begleiter:innen. Vor diesem Hintergrund hat die vorliegende kumulative Dissertation das Ziel, durch die sinnverstehende Herausarbeitung von Deutungen der Begleiter:innen und geflüchteten Eltern zu einem besseren Verständnis der durch freiwilliges Engagement begleiteten Teilhabe geflüchteter Familien an frühpädagogischen Angeboten beizutragen. Die Dissertation begreift freiwillig Engagierte als ‚Koproduzent:innen‘ von integrationspolitischen Zielen. Auf Grundlage von 34 Interviews mit Engagierten, Koordinator:innen und geflüchteten Eltern, welche in neun Kommunen in Niedersachsen geführt wurden, wurden in drei Artikeln die folgenden Schwerpunkte bearbeitet: Deutungen der Zusammenarbeit zwischen zivilgesellschaftlichen und staatlichen Akteur:innen durch die Begleiter:innen durch Anbindung an das Konzept Koproduktion (Artikel 1), Deutungen von Problemen und Lösungen durch die Begleiter:innen anknüpfend an die Konzepte Vulnerabilität und Agency (Artikel 2) sowie Deutungen der Eltern als Zielgruppe, mit Blick auf deren Aufbau von Vertrauen gegenüber frühpädagogischen Angeboten (Artikel 3). Die Dissertation trägt zu den folgenden wissenschaftlichen Debatten bei: zu Dynamiken der Umsetzung von Policies, wenn zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement dabei eine zentrale Funktion einnimmt, sowie zur Umsetzung integrationspolitischer Ziele im konkreten Bereich der Nutzung frühpädagogischer Angebote durch geflüchtete Familien. Es zeigt sich, dass freiwillig Engagierte zwar staatliche Akteur:innen ergänzen und damit maßgeblich zur Umsetzung integrationspolitischer Ziele beitragen. Gleichzeitig deutet dies aber auf strukturelle Hürden hin und wirft die Frage auf, inwieweit das freiwillige Engagement hier die Verantwortung für staatliche Aufgaben übernimmt. Dabei treten in der Zusammenarbeit zwischen zivilgesellschaftlichen und staatlichen Akteur:innen häufig Konflikte auf, welche auf divergierende Deutungen des Begriffs ‚Integration‘ und eine fehlende Ausdefinition konkreter sich aus den integrationspolitischen Zielen ableitender Bedarfe beruhen.

Können die kulturellen Praktiken und wertschöpfenden Handlungen innerhalb von Musikkulturen mit dem Begriff der Produktivität erfasst werden? Dieser Frage geht diese Dissertation am Beispiel der Technokultur nach. Sie zeigt auf, wie Menschen in solchen Vergemeinschaftungsformen für sich und andere Werte schaffen. In Abgrenzung zu wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Formulierungen wird hier von Werte-Schöpfung gesprochen. Zugrundeliegend ist ein kulturwissenschaftliches Verständnis von Produktivität, welches den Fokus auf unterschiedliche Arten der Produktion und Werte-Schöpfung legt. Es wurden Akteur*innen, ihr Handeln und ihre musikalischen, kulturellen, sozialen, sinnstiftenden sowie ökonomischen Produktionen innerhalb der Technokultur auf unterschiedlichen Ebenen analysiert. Dies umfasst Produzierende und Partizipierende, Gemeinschaften, Szenen, Städte, Festivals und Ökonomie. Das methodische Vorgehen basiert auf (Szene-)Ethnographie als Verfahren der Datengenerierung, was Interviews mit Experten (DJs, Produzenten, Labelmacher, Angestellte von Musikwirtschaftsbetrieben, Veranstalter) und Partizipierenden sowie teilnehmende Beobachtungen (Clubs, Festivals, Berlin, Köln, Lärz und Ruhrgebiet) umfasst. Zusätzlich wurden Technotracks musikhermeneutisch analysiert, um die Vielfalt der Affordanzen an Technomusik aufzuzeigen. Zur Datenauswertung wurde auf das Grounded Theory-Verfahren der Situationsanalyse (Clarke 2012) zurückgegriffen. Leitend für die Analyse sind die Konzepte der „Sonic Bodies“ und des „Soundings“ von Julian Henriques (2011), des Musickings (Small 1998) sowie der Begriff des „Sonischen“. Im Zentrum der Arbeit steht das Handeln von Menschen mit Klang und Musik in musikalischen Soziokulturen und der wechselseitige Einfluss mit der umgebenden Stadt und Gesellschaft. Die Dissertation zeigt auf, wie die Sonic Bodies der Technokultur persönliche, soziale, kulturelle und ökonomische Werte für sich schöpfen, auf dieser Grundlage ihr Handeln austarieren und sich mit anderen Produzierenden und Partizipierenden zu temporären oder beständigen Werte-Schöpfungsnetzwerken zusammenschließen. Die Möglichkeiten der Werte-Schöpfung sind durch mehrere Konfigurationen gerahmt. Darunter fallen sozialstrukturelle, subjektive und subkulturelle bzw. kulturindustrielle Faktoren, die das Handeln und die Werte-Schöpfung der Sonic Bodies prägen. Diese umfassen u. a. Faktoren sozialer Ungleichheit, individuelle Faktoren und Faktoren, die der Feldstruktur der Technokultur entspringen.